Search Results (25903 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-42384 2 Nsquared, Wordpress 2 Simply Schedule Appointments, Wordpress 2026-06-16 7.5 High
Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Simply Schedule Appointments < 1.6.11.2 versions.
CVE-2025-24204 1 Apple 1 Macos 2026-06-16 9.8 Critical
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4. An app may be able to access protected user data.
CVE-2025-43538 1 Apple 2 Macos, Macos Sonoma 2026-06-16 3.3 Low
A logging issue was addressed with improved data redaction. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.7.3 and iPadOS 18.7.3, iOS 26.2 and iPadOS 26.2, macOS Sonoma 14.8.3, macOS Tahoe 26.2, visionOS 26.2, watchOS 26.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.
CVE-2026-42667 2 Bookly, Wordpress 2 Bookly, Wordpress 2026-06-16 7.5 High
Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Bookly <= 27.4 versions.
CVE-2026-48965 2 Watchful, Wordpress 2 Xcloner, Wordpress 2026-06-16 6.5 Medium
Subscriber Sensitive Data Exposure in XCloner <= 4.8.6 versions.
CVE-2026-42768 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2026-06-16 3.7 Low
Issue summary: The CMS_decrypt and PKCS7_decrypt functions are vulnerable to Bleichenbacher-style attack when an attacker is able to provide the CMS or S/MIME messages and observe the error code and/or decryption output. Impact summary: The Bleichenbacher-style attack allows an attacker to use the victim's vulnerable application as a way to decrypt or sign messages with the victim's private RSA key. The attack is possible in 2 variants. 1. The decryption API (CMS_decrypt(), PKCS7_decrypt()) is used without providing the recipient certificate. In this case OpenSSL iterates over every KeyTransRecipientInfo (KTRI) without stopping at the first success. An attacker who authors a message with two KTRI entries — the first one wrapping a real CEK under the victim's public key, the second with an arbitrary probe ciphertext — obtains opportunity to iterate the 2nd KTRI to get a valid PKCS#1 v1.5 padding if the error code of the application is available. That is a Bleichenbacher oracle (Bleichenbacher, CRYPTO '98): an adaptive-chosen-ciphertext side channel from which the attacker decrypts any RSA ciphertext to the victim's key or forges any PKCS#1 v1.5 signature under it. 2. When the decryption API (CMS_decrypt(), PKCS7_decrypt()) is provided with the recipient certificate, and the recipient is not found, a random key is substituted. An attacker who authors a message and is able to compare both error code and the result of the decryption, can mount a Bleichenbacher oracle. We are not aware of any applications that provide a remote attacker an opportunity to mount an attack described in these scenarios. We consider the existence of such application very unlikely, and for this reason this CVE has been evaluated as Low severity. To avoid these attacks, when RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 Key Transport is in use, the invoked EVP_PKEY_decrypt() will use the implicit rejection mechanism described in draft-irtf-cfrg-rsa-guidance. In previous OpenSSL releases the implicit rejection was explicitly disabled. The implicit rejection mechanism always returns a plaintext value, the symmetric key. This result is deterministic for the ciphertext and the private key. The length of the decryption result can happen to match the length of the key of the symmetric cipher that was used for the content encryption. When a certificate is not provided, the last RecipientInfo producing a key that looks valid will be used. It may cause getting garbage content on decryption. As a proper way to deal with this a recipient certificate has to be provided to identify the particular RecipientInfo for decryption. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, and 3.4 are not affected by this issue, as CMS and S/MIME processing happens outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-40789 2026-06-16 7.5 High
Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Amelia <= 2.2 versions.
CVE-2026-49082 2026-06-16 7.4 High
Subscriber Sensitive Data Exposure in Chatway Live Chat &#8211; AI Chatbot, Customer Support, FAQ &amp; Helpdesk Customer Service &amp; Chat Buttons <= 1.4.8 versions.
CVE-2026-52692 2026-06-16 7.5 High
Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Affiliates Manager <= 2.9.50 versions.
CVE-2026-52695 2026-06-16 7.5 High
Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in ABC Crypto Checkout <= 1.8.2 versions.
CVE-2026-12191 1 Comma Ai 1 Openpilot 2026-06-15 7.8 High
A vulnerability was found in Comma AI Openpilot 0.11. This issue affects the function pickle.load/pickle.loads of the file selfdrive/modeld/modeld.py of the component Pickle Module. The manipulation results in deserialization. The attack is only possible with local access. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2026-50628 1 Apache 1 Cxf 2026-06-15 9.8 Critical
A logic error in OAuthRequestFilter rejects legitimate requests originating from the bound IP address, while blindly allowing requests from any other IP address. Enabling this security feature inadvertently creates an inverse security check. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7, which fixes this issue.
CVE-2026-39480 2026-06-15 7.5 High
Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Backup Migration <= 2.1.1 versions.
CVE-2026-47181 1 Penguinmod 1 Penguinmod-backendapi 2026-06-15 N/A
PenguinMod-BackendApi is the backend api for penguinmod. Prior to version 1.0.0, a NoSQL injection vulnerability in the password reset endpoint allows any authenticated user to change the password of an account, leading to full account takeover. An attacker only needs a registered account and a valid password reset token for their own account. This issue has been patched in version 1.0.0.
CVE-2026-47263 1 Discourse 1 Discourse 2026-06-15 4.3 Medium
Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. From versions 2026.1.0-latest to before 2026.1.4, 2026.3.0-latest to before 2026.3.1, and 2026.4.0-latest to before 2026.4.1, the MessageBus.publish call for /web_hook_events/<id> in Jobs::RedeliverWebHookEvents did not pass group_ids, leaving the channel readable by any authenticated user (or anonymous user on instances where login_required is disabled). Webhook IDs are sequential integers and trivially enumerable. This issue has been patched in versions 2026.1.4, 2026.3.1, 2026.4.1, and 2026.5.0-latest.1.
CVE-2026-42972 1 Microsoft 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more 2026-06-15 5.5 Medium
Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Windows Hyper-V allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
CVE-2025-33051 1 Microsoft 5 Exchange Server, Exchange Server 2016, Exchange Server 2019 and 2 more 2026-06-15 7.5 High
Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
CVE-2025-25005 1 Microsoft 5 Exchange Server, Exchange Server 2016, Exchange Server 2019 and 2 more 2026-06-15 6.5 Medium
Improper input validation in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.
CVE-2025-59248 1 Microsoft 7 Exchange, Exchange Server, Exchange Server 2016 and 4 more 2026-06-15 7.5 High
Improper input validation in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
CVE-2025-64666 1 Microsoft 5 Exchange Server, Exchange Server 2016, Exchange Server 2019 and 2 more 2026-06-15 7.5 High
Improper input validation in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.