| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Payroll product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Payroll. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Payroll. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| In JetBrains GoLand before 2026.2 arbitrary code execution was possible before granting project trust in the Go Modules integration |
| Improper control of generation of code ('Code Injection') in the schedule feature in Devolutions PowerShell Universal 2026.2.2 and earlier allows an authenticated user with schedule creation permission to execute arbitrary PowerShell code via crafted schedule parameter names concatenated into a script invocation. |
| An issue in dnsmgr v.2.15 and before allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the ping function of the CheckUils.php file |
| Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a simple template language. In versions prior to 2.4.3, banks parses Tool JSON objects from the rendered body of {% completion %} blocks and later resolves their import_path field through importlib.import_module(...) + getattr(...) to obtain the callable that handles a tool call. There is no allowlist or sanitization on import_path, so any importable Python attribute (e.g. os.system, subprocess.getoutput) can be selected. When the LLM emits a tool_calls entry whose function.name matches the attacker-supplied tool name, the resolved callable is invoked with kwargs decoded from tool_call.function.arguments, yielding arbitrary code execution in the banks-hosting process. This is distinct from GHSA-gphh-9q3h-jgpp / CVE-2026-44209. That advisory was fixed in 2.4.2 by switching src/banks/env.py from Environment to SandboxedEnvironment. The fix does not touch src/banks/extensions/completion.py, and the unsafe import + getattr chain still executes on 2.4.2. The malicious Tool JSON is plain text in the rendered template body — it requires no Jinja attribute access, so the sandbox is irrelevant. This issue has been fixed in version 2.4.3. |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in FileSystem in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| Inappropriate implementation in AdFilter in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Camaleon CMS versions 2.1.1 through 2.9.1 contains an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows users with custom_fields manage permission to execute arbitrary Ruby code by supplying a malicious expression through the select_eval custom field type. Attackers can store an attacker-controlled Ruby expression in the field options command parameter, which is evaluated via instance_eval within an ERB view whenever a post edit page is rendered, achieving server-side code execution with web server process privileges. |
| sentence-transformers contains a security control bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by exploiting a logic flaw in the import_module_class helper within sentence_transformers/util/misc.py, where the guard condition includes an 'or os.path.exists(model_name_or_path)' clause that satisfies the trust gate whenever the supplied path exists on the local filesystem, regardless of the trust_remote_code=False argument. Attackers who can control or influence the contents of a model directory on disk can place malicious Python files such as modeling_*.py referenced via modules.json, causing the code to execute at import time when an application loads the model with SentenceTransformer(path, trust_remote_code=False), bypassing the documented security contract and achieving code execution within the loading process. |
| Savon is a Ruby SOAP client. From 0.9.8 until 2.17.2, Savon::Model .all_operations interpolates attacker-controlled WSDL operation names into Ruby source passed to module_eval, allowing Ruby code execution in the application process. This issue is fixed in version 2.17.2. |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Innotim Software, Telecommunications and Consulting Trade Ltd. Co. Logsign SIEM allows Code Injection.
This issue affects Logsign SIEM: before 6.4.108. |
| SGLang contains an RCE vulnerability when the optional dumper subsystem is enabled, allowing for a sandbox escape when DUMPER_SERVER_PORT is set, enabling code execution on inference requests. |
| Inappropriate implementation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to inject scripts or HTML into a privileged page via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| The ElementsKit Elementor Addons WordPress plugin before 3.10.01 does not prevent a custom-widget definition saved by a user with administrative capabilities from being written verbatim into a generated PHP file that the ElementsKit Elementor Addons WordPress plugin before 3.10.01 subsequently executes, allowing arbitrary PHP code to run on the server; on a multisite network this lets a non-super subsite Administrator, who is otherwise denied code/file editing, reach host-level code execution beyond the privileges the network grants them. |
| ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA), in the default configuration
of affected versions, exposes its data and configuration endpoint
without any authentication and permissive CORS on every response. An
unauthenticated attacker with network access can read live process
values and server configuration. |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to bypass same origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| An issue in Generic OEM UZ801_v2.1 4G LTE Router V3.4.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the /ajax web management API endpoint in MifiService.apk |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code. |
