Search Results (109281 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2021-26875 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26874 1 Microsoft 9 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 6 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Overlay Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26873 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more 2026-08-19 7 High
Windows User Profile Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26872 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26871 1 Microsoft 6 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 3 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26870 1 Microsoft 9 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 6 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26868 1 Microsoft 15 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 12 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26866 1 Microsoft 11 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 8 more 2026-08-19 7.1 High
Windows Update Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26865 1 Microsoft 10 Windows 10, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 7 more 2026-08-19 8.8 High
Windows Container Execution Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26864 1 Microsoft 10 Windows 10, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 7 more 2026-08-19 8.4 High
Windows Virtual Registry Provider Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26863 1 Microsoft 9 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 6 more 2026-08-19 7 High
Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26862 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more 2026-08-19 7 High
Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26861 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26860 1 Microsoft 9 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 6 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows App-V Overlay Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26859 1 Microsoft 1 Power Bi Report Server 2026-08-19 7.7 High
Microsoft Power BI Information Disclosure Vulnerability
CVE-2021-24110 1 Microsoft 2 Hevc Video Extensions, High Efficiency Video Coding 2026-08-19 7.8 High
HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2021-24090 1 Microsoft 8 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 5 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Error Reporting Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-1640 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-24089 1 Microsoft 2 Hevc Video Extensions, High Efficiency Video Coding 2026-08-19 7.8 High
HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2026-68147 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-19 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices() When a blk_crypto_key starts being used or is evicted, fs/crypto/ calls fscrypt_get_devices() to get the filesystem's list of block devices, then iterates over them and calls blk_crypto_config_supported(), blk_crypto_start_using_key(), or blk_crypto_evict_key() on each one. Currently, the block device pointers are placed in a dynamically allocated array. This dynamic allocation is problematic because: - It can fail, especially at the fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() call site when it's invoked for inode eviction under direct reclaim. - fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() doesn't handle the failure. It just zeroizes and frees the blk_crypto_key without calling blk_crypto_evict_key(). That causes a use-after-free. For now, let's fix this in the straightforward and easily-backportable way by switching to an on-stack array. Currently the fscrypt multi-device functionality is used only by f2fs, which has a hardcoded limit of 8 block devices. An on-stack array works fine for that. (Of course, this solution won't scale up to large number of block devices. For that we'd need a different solution, like moving the block device iteration into the filesystem. Or in the case of btrfs, which will only support blk-crypto-fallback, we should make it just call blk-crypto-fallback directly, so the block devices won't be needed.)