| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Windows Secure Boot stores Microsoft certificates in the UEFI KEK and DB. These original certificates are approaching expiration, and devices containing affected certificate versions must update them to maintain Secure Boot functionality and avoid compromising security by losing security fixes related to Windows boot manager or Secure Boot.
The operating system’s certificate update protection mechanism relies on firmware components that might contain defects, which can cause certificate trust updates to fail or behave unpredictably. This leads to potential disruption of the Secure Boot trust chain and requires careful validation and deployment to restore intended security guarantees.
Certificate Authority (CA)
Location
Purpose
Expiration Date
Microsoft Corporation KEK CA 2011
KEK
Signs updates to the DB and DBX
06/24/2026
Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011
DB
Signs 3rd party boot loaders, Option ROMs, etc.
06/27/2026
Microsoft Windows Production PCA 2011
DB
Signs the Windows Boot Manager
10/19/2026
For more information see this CVE and Windows Secure Boot certificate expiration and CA updates. |
| Use of uninitialized resource in Dynamic Root of Trust for Measurement (DRTM) allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| Not used |
| An issue was discovered in OpenStack Nova before 30.2.2, 31 before 31.2.1, and 32 before 32.1.1. By writing a malicious QCOW header to a root or ephemeral disk and then triggering a resize, a user may convince Nova's Flat image backend to call qemu-img without a format restriction, resulting in an unsafe image resize operation that could destroy data on the host system. Only compute nodes using the Flat image backend (usually configured with use_cow_images=False) are affected. |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, version(s) prior to 19.22, contain(s) an Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| Sensitive data disclosure and manipulation due to improper authentication. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux, Windows) before build 39938, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Linux, Windows) before build 41800. |
| Sensitive data disclosure and manipulation due to improper authentication. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux, Windows) before build 39938, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Linux, Windows) before build 41800. |
| Sensitive data disclosure and manipulation due to missing authentication. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 39870, Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 39938, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 41800. |
| Sensitive data disclosure and manipulation due to missing authorization. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 16 (Linux, Windows) before build 39938, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Linux, Windows) before build 41800. |
| In Apache Airflow versions before 3.1.6, the proxies and proxy fields within a Connection may include proxy URLs containing embedded authentication information. These fields were not treated as sensitive by default and therefore were not automatically masked in log output. As a result, when such connections are rendered or printed to logs, proxy credentials embedded in these fields could be exposed.
Users are recommended to upgrade to 3.1.6 or later, which fixes this issue |
| GFI MailEssentials AI versions prior to 22.4 contain a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the IP DNS Blocklist configuration page. An authenticated user can supply HTML/JavaScript in the ctl00$ContentPlaceHolder1$pv1$TXB_IPs parameter to /MailEssentials/pages/MailSecurity/ipdnsblocklist.aspx, which is stored and later rendered in the management interface, allowing script execution in the context of a logged-in user. |
| apko allows users to build and publish OCI container images built from apk packages. From version 0.14.8 to before 1.1.1, an attacker who controls or compromises an APK repository used by apko could cause resource exhaustion on the build host. The ExpandApk function in pkg/apk/expandapk/expandapk.go expands .apk streams without enforcing decompression limits, allowing a malicious repository to serve a small, highly-compressed .apk that inflates into a large tar stream, consuming excessive disk space and CPU time, causing build failures or denial of service. This issue has been patched in version 1.1.1. |
| apko allows users to build and publish OCI container images built from apk packages. From version 0.14.8 to before 1.1.0, expandapk.Split drains the first gzip stream of an APK archive via io.Copy(io.Discard, gzi) without explicit bounds. With an attacker-controlled input stream, this can force large gzip inflation work and lead to resource exhaustion (availability impact). The Split function reads the first tar header, then drains the remainder of the gzip stream by reading from the gzip reader directly without any maximum uncompressed byte limit or inflate-ratio cap. A caller that parses attacker-controlled APK streams may be forced to spend excessive CPU time inflating gzip data, leading to timeouts or process slowdown. This issue has been patched in version 1.1.0. |
