| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in PL/SQL procedures that run with definer rights in Oracle 9i and 10g allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands and gain privileges via (1) DBMS_EXPORT_EXTENSION, (2) WK_ACL.GET_ACL, (3) WK_ACL.STORE_ACL, (4) WK_ADM.COMPLETE_ACL_SNAPSHOT, (5) WK_ACL.DELETE_ACLS_WITH_STATEMENT, or (6) DRILOAD.VALIDATE_STMT. |
| Oracle 9i Application Server (Oracle9iAS) 9.0.2 allows remote attackers to poison the web cache, bypass web application firewall protection, and conduct XSS attacks via an HTTP request with both a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header and a Content-Length header, which causes Application Server to incorrectly handle and forward the body of the request in a way that causes the receiving server to process it as a separate HTTP request, aka "HTTP Request Smuggling." |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Application Server 9.0 up to 10.1.2.0 have unknown impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) AS02 in Containers for J2EE, (2) AS07 in Internet Directory, (3) AS09 in Report Server, and (4) AS11 in Web Cache. |
| The PORTAL schema in Oracle Application Server (OracleAS) Discussion Forum Portlet allows remote attackers to obtain the source code for arbitrary JSP and other files via a df_next_page parameter with a trailing null byte (%00). |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5, Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, and Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i) has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DBC01 in the Protocol Support component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle HTTP Server component of Oracle Database Server 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5, and Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# OHS01. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Oracle Reports Developer component of Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.1 and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10 have unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) REP01 and (2) REP02. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Application Server 6.0.8.26(PS17) and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10 have unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) REP05 and (2) REP06 in the Oracle Reports Developer component. NOTE: Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that REP05 is the same as CVE-2005-2378 and REP06 is the same as CVE-2005-2371, both of which involve directory traversal. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle PL/SQL (PLSQL), as used in Database Server DS 9.2.0.7 and 10.1.0.5, Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, 10.1.2.0.2, 10.1.2.1.0, and 10.1.3.0.0, E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10, and Collaboration Suite 10.1.1, 10.1.2.0, 10.1.2.1, and 9.0.4.2, allows attackers to bypass the PLSQLExclusion list and access excluded packages and procedures, aka Vuln# PLSQL01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Thesaurus Management System component in Oracle E-Business Suite and OPA 4.5.2 Applications has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Vuln# OPA01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.2.3 and 9.0.3.1 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS02. |
| Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). |
| Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'. |
| The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). |
