| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Buffer overflow in tnslsnr of Oracle 8i Database Server 8.1.5 for Linux allows local users to execute arbitrary code as the oracle user via a long command line argument. |
| Buffer overflow in ORACLE.EXE for Oracle Database Server 9i, 8i, 8.1.7, and 8.0.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long username that is provided during login, as exploitable through client applications that perform their own authentication, as demonstrated using LOADPSP. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle HTTP Server component of Oracle Database Server 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5, and Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# OHS01. |
| Multiple buffer overflows in Oracle 9i Database release 2, Release 1, 8i, 8.1.7, and 8.0.6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long conversion string argument to the TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ function, (2) a long time zone argument to the TZ_OFFSET function, or (3) a long DIRECTORY parameter to the BFILENAME function. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database Server 9i up to 10.1.0.4.2 have unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) DB04 in Change Data Capture; (2) DB06 in Data Guard Logical Standby; (3) DB10 in Locale; (4) DB12 in Materialized Views; (5) DB13 in Objects Extension; (6) DB15 in Oracle Label Security; (7) DB27 in Security, possibly due to a buffer overflow in sys.pbsde.init; and (8) DB28 and (9) DB29 in Workspace Manager. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.7, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.1 have unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) DB17 in the Oracle Text component and (2) DB18 in the Program Interface Network component. NOTE: details are unavailable from Oracle, but they have not publicly disputed a claim by a reliable independent researcher that states that DB17 involves SQL injection in the (a) VALIDATE_STATEMENT and BUILD_DML functions in CTXSYS.DRILOAD; (b) CLEAN_DML function in CTXSYS.DRIDML; (c) GET_ROWID function in CTXSYS.CTX_DOC; (d) BROWSE_WORDS function in CTXSYS.CTX_QUERY; and (e) ODCIINDEXTRUNCATE, ODCIINDEXDROP, and ODCIINDEXDELETE functions in CATINDEXMETHODS. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Security component of Oracle Database server 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.6, and 10.1.0.4 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB21. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Net Foundation Layer component of Oracle Database server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.6, and 10.1.0.4 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB08. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) Wallet component of Oracle Database server 10.2.0.1 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB27. NOTE: Oracle has not disputed a reliable researcher report that TDA stores the master key without encryption, which allows local users to obtain the key via the SGA. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5, Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, and Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i) has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DBC01 in the Protocol Support component. |
| Unknown multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle9i Database Server 9.0.1.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.3, and 9.2.0.4 allow local users with the ability to invoke SQL to cause a denial of service or obtain sensitive information. |
| Multiple unknown vulnerabilities in Oracle 9i Lite Mobile Server 5.0.0.0.0 through 5.0.2.9.0 allow remote authenticated users to gain privileges. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 have unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) DB21 for Statistics and (2) DB22 for Upgrade & Downgrade. NOTE: as of 20060719, Oracle has not disputed a claim by a reliable researcher that DB21 is for a local SQL injection vulnerability in SYS.DBMS_STATS, and that DB22 is for SQL injection in SYS.DBMS_UPGRADE. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Advanced Queuing component of Oracle Database server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.6, 10.1.0.3 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB01. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Oracle 9i and 10g allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long token in the text of a wrapped procedure. |
| The (1) dbsnmp and (2) nmo programs in Oracle 8i, Oracle 9i, and Oracle IAS 9.0.2.0.1, on Unix systems, use a default path to find and execute library files while operating at raised privileges, which allows certain Oracle user accounts to gain root privileges via a modified libclntsh.so.9.0. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the Oracle Text component of Oracle Database 10g, and possibly earlier versions, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unknown vectors. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that this issue has been addressed by Oracle. It is possible that this is the same issue as Oracle Vuln# DB15 from the January 2006 CPU, in which case this would be subsumed by CVE-2006-0260. |
| Buffer overflows in the ApacheBench benchmark support program (ab.c) in Apache before 1.3.27, and Apache 2.x before 2.0.43, allow a malicious web server to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long response. |
| Buffer overflow in extproc in Oracle 10g allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via environment variables in the library name, which are expanded after the length check is performed. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Change Data Capture component of Oracle Database server 9.2.0.7, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.1 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB02. NOTE: details are unavailable from Oracle, but they have not publicly disputed a claim by a reliable independent researcher that states that the problem is SQL injection in the CDC_ALLOCATE_LOCK function of the DBMS_CDC_UTILITY package. |
