Filtered by vendor Jenkins
Subscriptions
Total
1677 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2025-31726 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Stack Hammer | 2025-04-18 | 5.5 Medium |
Jenkins Stack Hammer Plugin 1.0.6 and earlier stores Stack Hammer API keys unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the Jenkins controller file system. | ||||
CVE-2025-31723 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Simple Queue | 2025-04-17 | 4.3 Medium |
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Simple Queue Plugin 1.4.6 and earlier allows attackers to change and reset the build queue order. | ||||
CVE-2025-31724 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Cadence Vmanager | 2025-04-17 | 4.3 Medium |
Jenkins Cadence vManager Plugin 4.0.0-282.v5096a_c2db_275 and earlier stores Verisium Manager vAPI keys unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the Jenkins controller file system. | ||||
CVE-2025-31725 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Monitor-remote-job | 2025-04-17 | 5.5 Medium |
Jenkins monitor-remote-job Plugin 1.0 stores passwords unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the Jenkins controller file system. | ||||
CVE-2025-31727 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Asakusasatellite | 2025-04-17 | 5.5 Medium |
Jenkins AsakusaSatellite Plugin 0.1.1 and earlier stores AsakusaSatellite API keys unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Item/Extended Read permission or access to the Jenkins controller file system. | ||||
CVE-2025-31728 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Asakusasatellite | 2025-04-17 | 5.5 Medium |
Jenkins AsakusaSatellite Plugin 0.1.1 and earlier does not mask AsakusaSatellite API keys displayed on the job configuration form, increasing the potential for attackers to observe and capture them. | ||||
CVE-2016-3722 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Jenkins before 2.3 and LTS before 1.651.2 allow remote authenticated users with multiple accounts to cause a denial of service (unable to login) by editing the "full name." | ||||
CVE-2016-3723 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Jenkins before 2.3 and LTS before 1.651.2 allow remote authenticated users with read access to obtain sensitive plugin installation information by leveraging missing permissions checks in unspecified XML/JSON API endpoints. | ||||
CVE-2016-3724 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Jenkins before 2.3 and LTS before 1.651.2 allow remote authenticated users with extended read access to obtain sensitive password information by reading a job configuration. | ||||
CVE-2016-0791 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 do not use a constant-time algorithm to verify CSRF tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via a brute-force approach. | ||||
CVE-2016-0789 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in the CLI command documentation in Jenkins before 1.650 and LTS before 1.642.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | ||||
CVE-2015-7536 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors related to workspaces and archived artifacts. | ||||
CVE-2015-7538 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 allow remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism via unspecified vectors. | ||||
CVE-2015-7539 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
The Plugins Manager in Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 does not verify checksums for plugin files referenced in update site data, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted plugin. | ||||
CVE-2015-5320 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 do not properly verify the shared secret used in JNLP slave connections, which allows remote attackers to connect as slaves and obtain sensitive information or possibly gain administrative access by leveraging knowledge of the name of a slave. | ||||
CVE-2015-5322 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Directory traversal vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to list directory contents and read arbitrary files in the Jenkins servlet resources via directory traversal sequences in a request to jnlpJars/. | ||||
CVE-2015-5325 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 allow attackers to bypass intended slave-to-master access restrictions by leveraging a JNLP slave. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-3665. | ||||
CVE-2015-1810 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
The HudsonPrivateSecurityRealm class in Jenkins before 1.600 and LTS before 1.596.1 does not restrict access to reserved names when using the "Jenkins' own user database" setting, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by creating a reserved name. | ||||
CVE-2015-1813 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.606 and LTS before 1.596.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-1812. | ||||
CVE-2014-3665 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Jenkins before 1.587 and LTS before 1.580.1 do not properly ensure trust separation between a master and slaves, which might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on the master by leveraging access to the slave. |