| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Stoque Zeev.it 4.24. This affects an unknown part of the file /Login?inpLostSession=1 of the component Login Page. The manipulation of the argument inpRedirectURL leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna when using DuckDB as the database. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted SQL queries that leverage DuckDB's default features, such as `read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, and `read_blob`, to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, internal systems, and potentially further attacks. |
| The Backstage Scaffolder plugin Houses types and utilities for building scaffolder-related modules. A vulnerability is identified in Backstage Scaffolder template functionality where Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) can be exploited to perform Git config injection. The vulnerability allows an attacker to capture privileged git tokens used by the Backstage Scaffolder plugin. With these tokens, unauthorized access to sensitive resources in git can be achieved. The impact is considered medium severity as the Backstage Threat Model recommends restricting access to adding and editing templates in the Backstage Catalog plugin. The issue has been resolved in versions `v0.4.12`, `v0.5.1` and `v0.6.1` of the `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` package. Users are encouraged to upgrade to this version to mitigate the vulnerability. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may ensure that templates do not change git config. |
| An issue in Ladder v.0.0.1 thru v.0.0.21 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request to the API. |
| The Google Doc Embedder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery via the 'gview' shortcode in versions up to, and including, 2.6.4. This can allow authenticated attackers with contributor-level permissions or above to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the endpoint http://{your-server}/url-to-pdf of Stirling-PDF 0.35.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information via a crafted request. |
| SAP NetWeaver Administrator(System Overview) allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate accessible HTTP endpoints in the internal network by specially crafting HTTP requests. On successful exploitation this can result in Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which could have a low impact on integrity and confidentiality of data. It has no impact on availability of the application. |
| In certain conditions, SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP allows an authenticated attacker to craft a Remote Function Call (RFC) request to restricted destinations, which can be used to expose credentials for a remote service. These credentials can then be further exploited to completely compromise the remote service, potentially resulting in a significant impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application. |
| Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux may be vulnerable to Spring Environment property modification.
An application should be considered vulnerable when all the following are true:
* The application is using Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux (Spring Cloud Gateway Server WebMVC is not vulnerable).
* Spring Boot actuator is a dependency.
* The Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux actuator web endpoint is enabled via management.endpoints.web.exposure.include=gateway.
* The actuator endpoints are available to attackers.
* The actuator endpoints are unsecured. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Laborator Oxygen oxygen allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Oxygen: from n/a through <= 6.0.8. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SaxEventRecorder by QOS.CH logback version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and 1.4.0 to 1.5.12 on the Java platform, allows an attacker to
forge requests by compromising logback configuration files in XML.
The attacks involves the modification of DOCTYPE declaration in XML configuration files. |
| The Orbit Fox: Duplicate Page, Menu Icons, SVG Support, Cookie Notice, Custom Fonts & More WordPress plugin before 3.0.2 does not limit URLs which may be used for the stock photo import feature, allowing the user to specify arbitrary URLs. This leads to a server-side request forgery as the user may force the server to access any URL of their choosing. |
| O'View MapServer developed by PilotGaea Technologies has a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to exploit this vulnerability to probe internal network. |
| The urllib.parse.urlsplit() and urlparse() functions improperly validated bracketed hosts (`[]`), allowing hosts that weren't IPv6 or IPvFuture. This behavior was not conformant to RFC 3986 and potentially enabled SSRF if a URL is processed by more than one URL parser. |
| There is an SSRF vulnerability in the Fluid Topics platform that affects versions prior to 4.3, where the server can be forced to make arbitrary requests to internal and external resources by an authenticated user. |
| The Ninja Forms Webhooks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.7 via the form webhook functionality. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| A flaw was found in` JwtValidator.resolvePublicKey` in JBoss EAP, where the validator checks jku and sends a HTTP request. During this process, no whitelisting or other filtering behavior is performed on the destination URL address, which may result in a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. |
| The Stream plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.2 due to insufficient validation on the webhook feature. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| The WPGet API – Connect to any external REST API plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.10. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| A
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause unauthenticated remote
code execution when the server is accessed via the network with knowledge of hidden URLs and manipulation
of host request header. |
