| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Tanium addressed an information disclosure vulnerability in Threat Response. |
| Tanium addressed an information disclosure vulnerability in Threat Response. |
| Tanium addressed an information disclosure vulnerability in Threat Response. |
| Tanium addressed an information disclosure vulnerability in Threat Response. |
| A SQL injection issue in a database stored function in TrueConf Server 5.2.0.10225 (fixed in 5.2.6.10025) allows a low-privileged database user to execute arbitrary SQL commands as the database administrator, resulting in execution of arbitrary code. |
| A race condition vulnerability exists in the SAP Commerce cloud. Because of this when an attacker adds products to a cart, it may result in a cart entry being created with erroneous product value which could be checked out. This leads to high impact on data integrity, with no impact on data confidentiality or availability of the application. |
| Due to a Deserialization vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver (JMS service), an attacker authenticated as an administrator with local access could submit specially crafted content to the server. If processed by the application, this content could trigger unintended behavior during internal logic execution, potentially causing a denial of service. Successful exploitation results in a high impact on availability, while confidentiality and integrity remain unaffected. |
| Tanium addressed an information disclosure vulnerability in Threat Response. |
| Due to a CRLF Injection vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java, an authenticated attacker with administrative access could submit specially crafted content to the application. If processed by the application, this content enables injection of untrusted entries into generated configuration, allowing manipulation of application-controlled settings. Successful exploitation leads to a low impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability remain unaffected. |
| SAP Fiori App Manage Service Entry Sheets does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This has low impact on integrity, confidentiality and availability are not impacted. |
| An erroneous authorization check in SAP Business Workflow leads to privilege escalation. An authenticated administrative user can bypass role restrictions by leveraging permissions from a less sensitive function to execute unauthorized, high-privilege actions. This has a high impact on data integrity, with low impact on confidentiality and no impact on availability of the application. |
| Tanium addressed an improper output sanitization vulnerability in Tanium Appliance. |
| In SAP Business One, sensitive information is written to the application�s memory dump files without obfuscation. Gaining access to this information could potentially lead to unauthorized operations within the B1 environment, including modification of company data. This issue results in a high impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on availability. |
| Tanium addressed an unauthorized code execution vulnerability in Tanium Appliance. |
| Kanboard is project management software focused on Kanban methodology. Prior to 1.2.50, the getSwimlane API method lacks project-level authorization, allowing authenticated users to access swimlane data from projects they cannot access. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.50. |
| CASL Ability, versions 2.4.0 through 6.7.4, contains a prototype pollution vulnerability. |
| Missing protection mechanism for alternate hardware interface in the Intel(R) Quick Assist Technology for some Intel(R) Platforms within Ring 0: Kernel may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| Uncontrolled search path for some AI Playground before version 2.6.1 beta within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| Insecure inherited permissions for some Intel(R) Graphics Software before version 25.30.1702.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| Out-of-bounds write in the firmware for the Intel(R) AMT and Intel(R) Standard Manageability within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Network adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (low) impacts. |
