| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the _RemoveRequest function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL DELETE command allowing for reading the whole database and deleting entries in a non critical table. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality and some loss of integrity. |
| A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the dsgvo_contracts view due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. |
| A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the accountstatus view devices parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL UPDATE command allowing for reading the whole database and changing values in a non critical table. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality and some loss of integrity. |
| A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the accountstatus view userid parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL UPDATE command allowing for reading the whole database and changing values in a non critical table. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality and some loss of integrity. |
| A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the DevSerialReset function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL UPDATE command allowing for reading the whole database and changing values in a non critical table. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality and some loss of integrity. |
| A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the DevSerialReset function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the sync_data24 task due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the _mb24confi_getDevice function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the mb24alarm.php files _mb24confi_getTagAlarm function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. |
| A flaw was found in p11-kit. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by calling the C_DeriveKey function on a remote token with specific IBM kyber or IBM btc derive mechanism parameters set to NULL. This could lead to the RPC-client attempting to return an uninitialized value, potentially resulting in a NULL dereference or undefined behavior. This issue may cause an application level denial of service or other unpredictable system states. |
| A flaw was found in glib. This vulnerability allows a heap buffer overflow and denial-of-service (DoS) via an integer overflow in GLib's GIO (GLib Input/Output) escape_byte_string() function when processing malicious file or remote filesystem attribute values. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the _mb24api_getUserAccount function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. |
| A flaw was found in GLib (Gnome Lib). This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to cause heap corruption, leading to a denial of service or potential code execution via a buffer-underflow in the GVariant parser when processing maliciously crafted input strings. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the dataapi.php files _mb24confi_getTagAlarm function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. |
| The MetaMagic SEO Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metamagic_update_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's SEO settings, including enabling or disabling the plugin and toggling description and keyword meta tag output via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The WP Promoter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getLiveValues functions tagid parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the userinfo endpoint due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities allow attackers to exploit a user's authenticated session to forge cross-site requests, inducing the execution of unintended operations such as tampering with configuration data. |
| An insecure password scheme refers to vulnerabilities arising from improper selection of encryption algorithms, inadequate key management, or flawed code implementation, which may lead to data leakage or tampering, such as hard-coded keys or the use of weak encryption algorithms. |
