| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Worksuite SaaS versions prior to 6.0.14 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Asset Management module that allows authenticated administrators to inject arbitrary JavaScript by entering malicious payloads into the Location and Description fields when creating a new asset. Attackers can store crafted HTML script tags in the application database that execute automatically in the browsers of any user who views the affected asset, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, and unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper processing of DRDA and DDM resynchronization requests. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform file manipulation due to path traversal. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to delete arbitrary files due to path traversal. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local authenticated attacker to change the ownership of arbitrary files due to improper validation of an attacker-controlled file path. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an out-of-bounds read. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to the use of uninitialized memory during ASN.1 length processing. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and potentially obtain sensitive information due to a stack-based buffer overflow. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a stack-based buffer overflow. |
| IBM i Access Client Solutions 1.1.2.0 through 1.1.9.13 is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution on Windows when installed for all users due to publicly writeable directory. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 Local is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. |
| Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Microsoft PowerShell allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Improper control of generation of code ('Code Injection') in the settings feature in Devolutions PowerShell Universal 2026.2.3 and earlier allows an authenticated user with settings management permission to execute arbitrary PowerShell code via a crafted setting value that is not properly escaped when written to the settings configuration file. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Saurus CMS Community Edition contains an unauthenticated open redirect vulnerability in the logout handling code in classes/port.inc.php, where the url parameter supplied via GET or POST is passed directly to the Location header without domain allowlist, scheme validation, or relative path enforcement. Attackers can craft a malicious logout URL containing an arbitrary external domain or javascript: URI scheme to redirect authenticated users to attacker-controlled phishing pages after session destruction, enabling credential theft and OAuth redirect abuse. |
| SiYuan before v3.7.4 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the /api/filetree/authFilePublishAccess endpoint, which is registered with CheckAuth only and is reachable anonymously. The endpoint never sets a failure code, so its outcome is signalled entirely by the response message and by the presence of a Set-Cookie header, and these signals differ across access tiers. By submitting requests with an empty password for a candidate document identifier, an anonymous attacker can distinguish whether a document is public/nonexistent, password-protected, or exists at the hidden or forbidden tier, thereby confirming the existence of documents they are not permitted to access. Because hidden and forbidden entries store an empty password, such requests also cause the server to issue a publish-auth cookie for forbidden documents. |
