| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Lobe Chat is a chatbot framework that supports speech synthesis, multimodal, and extensible Function Call plugin system. Prior to 0.150.6, lobe-chat had an unauthorized Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the /api/proxy endpoint. An attacker can construct malicious requests to cause Server-Side Request Forgery without logging in, attack intranet services, and leak sensitive information. |
| Suite CRM version 7.14.2 allows making arbitrary HTTP requests through
the vulnerable server. This is possible because the application is vulnerable
to SSRF. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm: Fix wait_fence submitqueue leak
We weren't dropping the submitqueue reference in all paths. In
particular, when the fence has already been signalled. Split out
a helper to simplify handling this in the various different return
paths. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the embedded web server in various Lexmark devices. This vulnerability can be leveraged by an attacker to force the device to send an arbitrary HTTP request to a third-party server. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to internal network access / potential data disclosure from a device. |
| Hidden Functionality vulnerability in NEC Corporation Aterm WG1800HP4, WG1200HS3, WG1900HP2, WG1200HP3, WG1800HP3, WG1200HS2, WG1900HP, WG1200HP2, W1200EX(-MS), WG1200HS, WG1200HP, WF300HP2, W300P, WF800HP, WR8165N, WG2200HP, WF1200HP2, WG1800HP2, WF1200HP, WG600HP, WG300HP, WF300HP, WG1800HP, WG1400HP, WR8175N, WR9300N, WR8750N, WR8160N, WR9500N, WR8600N, WR8370N, WR8170N, WR8700N, WR8300N, WR8150N, WR4100N, WR4500N, WR8100N, WR8500N, CR2500P, WR8400N, WR8200N, WR1200H, WR7870S, WR6670S, WR7850S, WR6650S, WR6600H, WR7800H, WM3400RN, WM3450RN, WM3500R, WM3600R, WM3800R, WR8166N, MR01LN MR02LN, WG1810HP(JE) and WG1810HP(MF) all versions allows a attacker to execute an arbitrary OS command with the root privilege via the internet |
| The Snow Monkey theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 29.1.5 via the request() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in silence Silencesoft RSS Reader allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Silencesoft RSS Reader: from n/a through 0.6. |
| SSRF in Ivanti Connect Secure before 22.7R2.9 or 22.8R2, Ivanti Policy Secure before 22.7R1.6, Ivanti ZTA Gateway before 2.8R2.3-723 and Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access before 22.8R1.4 (Fix deployed on 02-Aug-2025) allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin privileges to enumerate internal services. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Skimlinks Skimlinks Affiliate Marketing Tool allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Skimlinks Affiliate Marketing Tool: from n/a through 1.3. |
| InstantCMS is a free and open source content management system. A blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in InstantCMS up to and including 2.17.3 allows authenticated remote attackers to make nay HTTP/HTTPS request via the package parameter. It is possible to make any HTTP/HTTPS request to any website in installer functionality. Due to such vulnerability it is possible to for example scan local network, call local services and its functions, conduct a DoS attack, and/or disclose a server's real IP if it's behind a reverse proxy. It is also possible to exhaust server resources by sending plethora of such requests. As of time of publication, no patched releases are available. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Binsaifullah Beaf allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Beaf: from n/a through 1.6.2. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in activewebsight SEO Backlink Monitor allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects SEO Backlink Monitor: from n/a through 1.6.0. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Alex Content Mask allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Content Mask: from n/a through 1.8.5.2. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in publitio Publitio allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Publitio: from n/a through 2.2.1. |
| The Keras Model.load_model method can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True.
One can create a specially crafted .h5/.hdf5 model archive that, when loaded via Model.load_model, will trigger arbitrary code to be executed.
This is achieved by crafting a special .h5 archive file that uses the Lambda layer feature of keras which allows arbitrary Python code in the form of pickled code. The vulnerability comes from the fact that the safe_mode=True option is not honored when reading .h5 archives.
Note that the .h5/.hdf5 format is a legacy format supported by Keras 3 for backwards compatibility. |
| Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. In version 3.0.5, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in the /api/v1/fetch-links endpoint of the Flowise application. This vulnerability allows an attacker to use the Flowise server as a proxy to access internal network web services and explore their link structures. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.6. |
| A vulnerability was found in MuYuCMS up to 2.7. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /index/index.html of the component Add Fiend Link Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument Link URL results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SmartDataSoft DriCub allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects DriCub: from n/a through 2.9. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Pratik Ghela MakeStories (for Google Web Stories) allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects MakeStories (for Google Web Stories): from n/a through 3.0.4. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/vc4: don't check if plane->state->fb == state->fb
Currently, when using non-blocking commits, we can see the following
kernel warning:
[ 110.908514] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 110.908529] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
[ 110.908620] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1866 at lib/refcount.c:87 refcount_dec_not_one+0xb8/0xc0
[ 110.908664] Modules linked in: rfcomm snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq snd_seq_device cmac algif_hash aes_arm64 aes_generic algif_skcipher af_alg bnep hid_logitech_hidpp vc4 brcmfmac hci_uart btbcm brcmutil bluetooth snd_soc_hdmi_codec cfg80211 cec drm_display_helper drm_dma_helper drm_kms_helper snd_soc_core snd_compress snd_pcm_dmaengine fb_sys_fops sysimgblt syscopyarea sysfillrect raspberrypi_hwmon ecdh_generic ecc rfkill libaes i2c_bcm2835 binfmt_misc joydev snd_bcm2835(C) bcm2835_codec(C) bcm2835_isp(C) v4l2_mem2mem videobuf2_dma_contig snd_pcm bcm2835_v4l2(C) raspberrypi_gpiomem bcm2835_mmal_vchiq(C) videobuf2_v4l2 snd_timer videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_common snd videodev vc_sm_cma(C) mc hid_logitech_dj uio_pdrv_genirq uio i2c_dev drm fuse dm_mod drm_panel_orientation_quirks backlight ip_tables x_tables ipv6
[ 110.909086] CPU: 0 PID: 1866 Comm: kodi.bin Tainted: G C 6.1.66-v8+ #32
[ 110.909104] Hardware name: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Rev 1.2 (DT)
[ 110.909114] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 110.909132] pc : refcount_dec_not_one+0xb8/0xc0
[ 110.909152] lr : refcount_dec_not_one+0xb4/0xc0
[ 110.909170] sp : ffffffc00913b9c0
[ 110.909177] x29: ffffffc00913b9c0 x28: 000000556969bbb0 x27: 000000556990df60
[ 110.909205] x26: 0000000000000002 x25: 0000000000000004 x24: ffffff8004448480
[ 110.909230] x23: ffffff800570b500 x22: ffffff802e03a7bc x21: ffffffecfca68c78
[ 110.909257] x20: ffffff8002b42000 x19: ffffff802e03a600 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 110.909283] x17: 0000000000000011 x16: ffffffffffffffff x15: 0000000000000004
[ 110.909308] x14: 0000000000000fff x13: ffffffed577e47e0 x12: 0000000000000003
[ 110.909333] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000027 x9 : c912d0d083728c00
[ 110.909359] x8 : c912d0d083728c00 x7 : 65646e75203a745f x6 : 746e756f63666572
[ 110.909384] x5 : ffffffed579f62ee x4 : ffffffed579eb01e x3 : 0000000000000000
[ 110.909409] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffffffc00913b750 x0 : 0000000000000001
[ 110.909434] Call trace:
[ 110.909441] refcount_dec_not_one+0xb8/0xc0
[ 110.909461] vc4_bo_dec_usecnt+0x4c/0x1b0 [vc4]
[ 110.909903] vc4_cleanup_fb+0x44/0x50 [vc4]
[ 110.910315] drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes+0x88/0xa4 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 110.910669] vc4_atomic_commit_tail+0x390/0x9dc [vc4]
[ 110.911079] commit_tail+0xb0/0x164 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 110.911397] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1d0/0x1f0 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 110.911716] drm_atomic_commit+0xb0/0xdc [drm]
[ 110.912569] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x348/0x4b8 [drm]
[ 110.913330] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xec/0x15c [drm]
[ 110.914091] drm_ioctl+0x24c/0x3b0 [drm]
[ 110.914850] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x9c/0xd4
[ 110.914873] invoke_syscall+0x4c/0x114
[ 110.914897] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x118
[ 110.914917] do_el0_svc+0x38/0xd0
[ 110.914936] el0_svc+0x30/0x8c
[ 110.914958] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0
[ 110.914979] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
[ 110.914996] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
This happens because, although `prepare_fb` and `cleanup_fb` are
perfectly balanced, we cannot guarantee consistency in the check
plane->state->fb == state->fb. This means that sometimes we can increase
the refcount in `prepare_fb` and don't decrease it in `cleanup_fb`. The
opposite can also be true.
In fact, the struct drm_plane .state shouldn't be accessed directly
but instead, the `drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state()` helper function should
be used. So, we could stick to this check, but using
`drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state()`. But actually, this check is not re
---truncated--- |
