Total
96 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2017-10295 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 34 Debian Linux, Active Iq Unified Manager, Cloud Backup and 31 more | 2025-04-20 | 4.0 Medium |
Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Networking). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u161, 7u151, 8u144 and 9; Java SE Embedded: 8u144; JRockit: R28.3.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit. While the vulnerability is in Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Java SE, Java SE Embedded, JRockit accessible data. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited through sandboxed Java Web Start applications and sandboxed Java applets. It can also be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 4.0 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N). | ||||
CVE-2015-1445 | 1 Fli4l | 1 Fli4l | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
HTTP header injection in the httpd package in fli4l before 3.10.1 and 4.0 before 2015-01-30. | ||||
CVE-2017-1262 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted URL to cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web cache poisoning, cross-site scripting, and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 124737. | ||||
CVE-2017-12309 | 1 Cisco | 1 Email Security Appliance Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
A vulnerability in the Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a HTTP response splitting attack. The vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input values. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious HTTP headers, controlling the response body, or splitting the response into multiple responses. An exploit could allow the attacker to perform cross-site scripting attacks, cross-user defacement, web cache poisoning, and similar exploits. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf16705. | ||||
CVE-2017-7443 | 2 Apt-cacher-ng Project, Apt-cacher Project | 2 Apt-cacher-ng, Apt-cacher | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
apt-cacher before 1.7.15 and apt-cacher-ng before 3.4 allow HTTP response splitting via encoded newline characters, related to lack of blocking for the %0[ad] regular expression. | ||||
CVE-2016-8024 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Virusscan Enterprise | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Improper neutralization of CRLF sequences in HTTP headers vulnerability in Intel Security VirusScan Enterprise Linux (VSEL) 2.0.3 (and earlier) allows remote unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information via the server HTTP response spoofing. | ||||
CVE-2016-4993 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Wildfly Application Server | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in the Undertow web server in WildFly 10.0.0, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x before 7.0.2, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | ||||
CVE-2012-5486 | 3 Plone, Redhat, Zope | 3 Plone, Rhel Cluster, Zope | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
ZPublisher.HTTPRequest._scrubHeader in Zope 2 before 2.13.19, as used in Plone before 4.3 beta 1, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers via a linefeed (LF) character. | ||||
CVE-2014-9650 | 2 Broadcom, Redhat | 2 Rabbitmq Server, Openstack | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in the management plugin in RabbitMQ 2.1.0 through 3.4.x before 3.4.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via the download parameter to api/definitions. | ||||
CVE-2014-8150 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Haxx and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Libcurl and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in libcurl 6.0 through 7.x before 7.40.0, when using an HTTP proxy, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in a URL. | ||||
CVE-2015-0881 | 1 Squid-cache | 1 Squid | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in Squid before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted header in a response. | ||||
CVE-2016-5699 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Python, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Software Collections | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in the HTTPConnection.putheader function in urllib2 and urllib in CPython (aka Python) before 2.7.10 and 3.x before 3.4.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers via CRLF sequences in a URL. | ||||
CVE-2015-8852 | 2 Debian, Varnish Cache Project | 2 Debian Linux, Varnish Cache | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
Varnish 3.x before 3.0.7, when used in certain stacked installations, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a header line terminated by a \r (carriage return) character in conjunction with multiple Content-Length headers in an HTTP request. | ||||
CVE-2016-6839 | 1 Huawei | 1 Fusionaccess | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in Huawei FusionAccess before V100R006C00 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | ||||
CVE-2016-2216 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
The HTTP header parsing code in Node.js 0.10.x before 0.10.42, 0.11.6 through 0.11.16, 0.12.x before 0.12.10, 4.x before 4.3.0, and 5.x before 5.6.0 allows remote attackers to bypass an HTTP response-splitting protection mechanism via UTF-8 encoded Unicode characters in the HTTP header, as demonstrated by %c4%8d%c4%8a. | ||||
CVE-2016-5325 | 3 Nodejs, Redhat, Suse | 4 Node.js, Openshift, Rhel Software Collections and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in the ServerResponse#writeHead function in Node.js 0.10.x before 0.10.47, 0.12.x before 0.12.16, 4.x before 4.6.0, and 6.x before 6.7.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via the reason argument. | ||||
CVE-2015-0733 | 1 Cisco | 1 Headend Digital Broadband Delivery System | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in the HTTP Header Handler in Digital Broadband Delivery System in Cisco Headend System Release allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers, and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks or cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCur25580. | ||||
CVE-2015-8935 | 2 Php, Redhat | 2 Php, Rhel Software Collections | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
The sapi_header_op function in main/SAPI.c in PHP before 5.4.38, 5.5.x before 5.5.22, and 5.6.x before 5.6.6 supports deprecated line folding without considering browser compatibility, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks against Internet Explorer by leveraging (1) %0A%20 or (2) %0D%0A%20 mishandling in the header function. | ||||
CVE-2007-5595 | 1 Drupal | 1 Drupal | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in the drupal_goto function in includes/common.inc Drupal 4.7.x before 4.7.8 and 5.x before 5.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | ||||
CVE-2022-37436 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Http Server, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services | 2025-04-04 | 5.3 Medium |
Prior to Apache HTTP Server 2.4.55, a malicious backend can cause the response headers to be truncated early, resulting in some headers being incorporated into the response body. If the later headers have any security purpose, they will not be interpreted by the client. |