| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability was found in SingMR HouseRent 1.0. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/main/java/com/house/wym/controller/AdminController.java. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| In Eclipse ThreadX before 6.4.3, when memory protection is enabled, syscall parameters verification wasn't enough, allowing an attacker to obtain an arbitrary memory read/write. |
| A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in SingMR HouseRent 1.0. This affects the function singleUpload/upload of the file src/main/java/com/house/wym/controller/AddHouseController.java. The manipulation of the argument file leads to unrestricted upload. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| An improper check or handling of exceptional conditions vulnerability [CWE-703] in FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3 and before 7.2.7, FortiProxy version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3 and before 7.2.9, FortiPAM before 1.2.0 and FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3 and version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3 fgfm daemon may allow an unauthenticated attacker to repeatedly reset the fgfm connection via crafted SSL encrypted TCP requests. |
| An insufficient session expiration vulnerability [CWE-613] and an incorrect authorization vulnerability [CWE-863] in FortiIsolator 2.4.0 through 2.4.4, 2.3 all versions, 2.2.0, 2.1 all versions, 2.0 all versions authentication mechanism may allow remote unauthenticated attacker to deauthenticate logged in admins via crafted cookie and remote authenticated read-only attacker to gain write privilege via crafted cookie. |
| A insertion of sensitive information into sent data in Fortinet FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiVoice 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, 6.4.0 through 6.4.9, 6.0.7 through 6.0.12, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.9, FortiOS 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.17, 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, FortiWeb 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 6.4.0 through 6.4.3, FortiRecorder 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, FortiNDR 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, 7.1.0 through 7.1.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 1.5.0 through 1.5.3, FortiPAM 1.3.0 through 1.3.1, 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiTester 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.3.0 through 7.3.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.1.0 through 7.1.1, 7.0.0, 4.2.0 through 4.2.1, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.0 through 7.0.21, 2.0.0 through 2.0.14, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6, 1.0.0 through 1.0.7, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.1 through 7.4.3 allows attacker to disclose sensitive information via specially crafted packets. |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiSOAR 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, 7.4 all versions, 7.3 all versions may allow an attacker who has already obtained a non-login low privileged shell access (via another hypothetical vulnerability) to perform a local privilege escalation via crafted commands. |
| A heap-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.0 through 7.0.16, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.17, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2, 7.4.1 through 7.4.5, 7.2.1 through 7.2.8, 7.0.1 through 7.0.13, 6.4.1 through 6.4.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.5, 7.2.1 through 7.2.8, 7.0.1 through 7.0.13, 6.4.1 through 6.4.7, FortiProxy 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, 7.0.0 through 7.0.19, 2.0.0 through 2.0.14, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6, 1.0.0 through 1.0.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.13, 6.0.0 through 6.0.12, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.13, 6.0.0 through 6.0.12 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted requests. |
| A heap-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiSRA 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, FortiPAM 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, 1.3.0 through 1.3.1, 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.2 through 7.0.16, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.1 through 7.2.5 allows attackers to escalate their privilege via specially crafted http requests. |
| An Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability [CWE-613] in FortiOS SSL VPN 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.0 through 7.0.16, 6.4 all versions may allow a remote attacker (e.g. a former admin whose account was removed and whose session was terminated) in possession of the SAML record of a user session to access or re-open that session via re-use of SAML record. |
| An Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability [CWE-297] in FortiProxy version 7.6.1 and below, version 7.4.8 and below, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions and FortiOS version 7.6.2 and below, version 7.4.8 and below, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions ZTNA proxy may allow an unauthenticated attacker in a man-in-the middle position to intercept and tamper with connections to the ZTNA proxy |
| When an iRule using an ILX::call command is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| An Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability [CWE-94] in FortiClientMac 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.1 through 7.2.8 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's host via tricking the user into visiting a malicious website. |
| On the BIG-IP system, undisclosed endpoints that contain static non-sensitive information are accessible to an unauthenticated remote attacker through the Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user.
Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| When the BIG-IP system is configured as both a Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) service provider (SP) and Identity Provider (IdP), with single logout (SLO) enabled on an access policy, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in memory resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| When BIG-IP Advanced WAF is configured on a virtual server with Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection or when an NGINX server is configured with App Protect Bot Defense, undisclosed requests can disrupt new client requests. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| When a BIG-IP AFM denial-of-service (DoS) protection profile is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| When Diffie-Hellman (DH) group Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Brainpool curves are configured in an SSL profile's Cipher Rule or Cipher Group, and that profile is applied to a virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| Under undisclosed traffic conditions along with conditions beyond the attacker's control, hardware systems with a High-Speed Bridge (HSB) may experience a lockup of the HSB.
Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
