| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database Server 10.2.0.1, Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.1, Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i), and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10 have unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) WF02 and (2) WF03 in the Oracle Workflow Cartridge component. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the (1) MDSYS.SDO_GEOM_TRIG_INS1 and (2) MDSYS.SDO_LRS_TRIG_INS default triggers in Oracle 9i and 10g allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the new.table_name or new.column_name parameters. |
| Buffer overflow in the Advanced Replication component in Oracle Database Server 10.1.0.4 allows database users to execute arbitrary code via the VERIFY_LOG procedure of the DBMS_SNAPSHOT_UTL package, aka Vuln# DB03. |
| Multiple unknown vulnerabilities in Oracle 9i Lite Mobile Server 5.0.0.0.0 through 5.0.2.9.0 allow remote authenticated users to gain privileges. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the SYS.DBMS_METADATA_UTIL package in Oracle Database 10g, and possibly earlier versions, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unknown vectors. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that this issue has been addressed by Oracle. It is possible that this is the same issue as Oracle Vuln# DB05 from the January 2006 CPU, in which case this would be subsumed by CVE-2006-0260. However, there are some inconsistencies that make this unclear, and there is also a possibility that this is related to DB06, which is subsumed by CVE-2006-0259. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the Data Pump Metadata API in Oracle Database 10g and possibly earlier might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unknown vectors. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that this issue has been addressed by Oracle. It is possible that this is the same issue as Oracle Vuln# DB06 from the January 2006 CPU, in which case this would be subsumed by CVE-2006-0259 or, if it is DB05, subsumed by CVE-2006-0260. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 have unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) DB01 for Change Data Capture (CDC) component and (2) DB03 for Data Pump Metadata API. NOTE: as of 20060719, Oracle has not disputed a claim by a reliable researcher that DB01 is related to multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in SYS.DBMS_CDC_IMPDP using the (a) IMPORT_CHANGE_SET, (b) IMPORT_CHANGE_TABLE, (c) IMPORT_CHANGE_COLUMN, (d) IMPORT_SUBSCRIBER, (e) IMPORT_SUBSCRIBED_TABLE, (f) IMPORT_SUBSCRIBED_COLUMN, (g) VALIDATE_IMPORT, (h) VALIDATE_CHANGE_SET, (i) VALIDATE_CHANGE_TABLE, and (j) VALIDATE_SUBSCRIPTION procedures, and that DB03 is for SQL injection in the MAIN procedure for SYS.KUPW$WORKER. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 have unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) DB21 for Statistics and (2) DB22 for Upgrade & Downgrade. NOTE: as of 20060719, Oracle has not disputed a claim by a reliable researcher that DB21 is for a local SQL injection vulnerability in SYS.DBMS_STATS, and that DB22 is for SQL injection in SYS.DBMS_UPGRADE. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Dictionary component in Oracle Database 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, and 9.2.0.6 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# DB05. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, and 9.2.0.7 has unknown impact and attack vectors in the Oracle Spatial component, aka Vuln# DB13. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.7, 10.1.0.5, and other versions have unknown impact and attack vectors in the (1) Advanced Replication component, as identified by Vuln# DB01, and (2) Oracle Spatial component, as identified by Vuln# DB10. NOTE: details are unavailable from Oracle, but as of 20060421, they have not publicly disputed a claim by a reliable independent researcher that states that DB01 is an unknown issue in the DBMS_REPUTIL package, and DB10 is SQL injection in the INSERT_CATALOG, UPDATE_CATALOG, and DELETE_CATALOG functions of the SDO_CATALOG package. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4 and 9.0.1.5 has unknown impact and attack vectors in the Dictionary component, aka Vuln# DB04. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Net component of Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.4, and Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# JN01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 9.2.0.6 has unknown impact and attack vectors in the Advanced Replication component, aka Vuln# DB02. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Advanced Queuing component of Oracle Database server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.6, 10.1.0.3 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB01. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Oracle 9i and 10g allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long token in the text of a wrapped procedure. |
| Multiple buffer overflows in Oracle 9i Database release 2, Release 1, 8i, 8.1.7, and 8.0.6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long conversion string argument to the TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ function, (2) a long time zone argument to the TZ_OFFSET function, or (3) a long DIRECTORY parameter to the BFILENAME function. |
| Buffer overflow in ORACLE.EXE for Oracle Database Server 9i, 8i, 8.1.7, and 8.0.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long username that is provided during login, as exploitable through client applications that perform their own authentication, as demonstrated using LOADPSP. |
| Buffer overflows in the ApacheBench benchmark support program (ab.c) in Apache before 1.3.27, and Apache 2.x before 2.0.43, allow a malicious web server to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long response. |
| Multiple buffer overflows in the XML Database (XDB) functionality for Oracle 9i Database Release 2 allow local users to cause a denial of service or hijack user sessions. |
