Total
1372 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-27166 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.4 High |
| Coredump binaries in Toshiba printers have incorrect permissions. A local attacker can steal confidential information. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27155 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.7 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. The programs can be replaced by malicious programs by any local or remote attacker. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27153 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27152 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27151 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. The programs can be replaced by malicious programs by any local or remote attacker. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27150 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27149 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27148 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.4 High |
| The Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27144 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Toshiba printers provide several ways to upload files using the web interface without authentication. An attacker can overwrite any insecure files. And the Toshiba printers are vulnerable to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. An attacker can remotely compromise any Toshiba printer. The programs can be replaced by malicious programs by any local or remote attacker. This vulnerability can be executed in combination with other vulnerabilities and difficult to execute alone. So, the CVSS score for this vulnerability alone is lower than the score listed in the "Base Score" of this vulnerability. For detail on related other vulnerabilities, please ask to the below contact point. https://www.toshibatec.com/contacts/products/ As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23295 | 1 Apple | 1 Visionos | 2025-02-13 | 6.2 Medium |
| A permissions issue was addressed to help ensure Personas are always protected This issue is fixed in visionOS 1.1. An unauthenticated user may be able to use an unprotected Persona. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23201 | 1 Apple | 5 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 2 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.2 Medium |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Monterey 12.7.4, watchOS 10.3, tvOS 17.3, macOS Ventura 13.6.5, iOS 17.3 and iPadOS 17.3, macOS Sonoma 14.3. An app may be able to cause a denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43702 | 1 Arm | 6 Arm Compiler, Arm Compiler For Embedded Fusa, Arm Compiler For Functional Safety and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.8 High |
| When the directory containing the installer does not have sufficiently restrictive file permissions, an attacker can modify (or replace) the installer to execute malicious code. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43701 | 1 Arm | 11 Arm Compiler, Arm Compiler For Embedded Fusa, Arm Compiler For Functional Safety and 8 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.8 High |
| When the installation directory does not have sufficiently restrictive file permissions, an attacker can modify files in the installation directory to cause execution of malicious code. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38497 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Rust-lang | 5 Fedora, Devtools, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.8 High |
| Cargo downloads the Rust project’s dependencies and compiles the project. Cargo prior to version 0.72.2, bundled with Rust prior to version 1.71.1, did not respect the umask when extracting crate archives on UNIX-like systems. If the user downloaded a crate containing files writeable by any local user, another local user could exploit this to change the source code compiled and executed by the current user. To prevent existing cached extractions from being exploitable, the Cargo binary version 0.72.2 included in Rust 1.71.1 or later will purge caches generated by older Cargo versions automatically. As a workaround, configure one's system to prevent other local users from accessing the Cargo directory, usually located in `~/.cargo`. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34352 | 1 Apple | 5 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 2 more | 2025-02-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| A permissions issue was addressed with improved redaction of sensitive information. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.4, tvOS 16.5, iOS 16.5 and iPadOS 16.5, watchOS 9.5. An attacker may be able to leak user account emails. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32404 | 1 Apple | 4 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 5.5 Medium |
| This issue was addressed with improved entitlements. This issue is fixed in iOS 16.5 and iPadOS 16.5, watchOS 9.5, macOS Ventura 13.4. An app may be able to bypass Privacy preferences. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23583 | 3 Debian, Intel, Netapp | 443 Debian Linux, Core I3-1005g1, Core I3-1005g1 Firmware and 440 more | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| Sequence of processor instructions leads to unexpected behavior for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege and/or information disclosure and/or denial of service via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0181 | 6 Citrix, Linux, Microsoft and 3 more | 6 Hypervisor, Linux Kernel, Windows and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.1 High |
| NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in a kernel mode layer handler, where memory permissions are not correctly checked, which may lead to denial of service and data tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3981 | 3 Fedoraproject, Gnu, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Grub2, Enterprise Linux | 2025-02-13 | 3.3 Low |
| A flaw in grub2 was found where its configuration file, known as grub.cfg, is being created with the wrong permission set allowing non privileged users to read its content. This represents a low severity confidentiality issue, as those users can eventually read any encrypted passwords present in grub.cfg. This flaw affects grub2 2.06 and previous versions. This issue has been fixed in grub upstream but no version with the fix is currently released. | ||||
| CVE-2020-13922 | 1 Apache | 1 Dolphinscheduler | 2025-02-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Versions of Apache DolphinScheduler prior to 1.3.2 allowed an ordinary user under any tenant to override another users password through the API interface. | ||||