| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CRU Ditto Forensic FieldStation with firmware before 2013Oct15a allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify the disk erase technique settings via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Pulse CMS Basic 1.2.2 and 1.2.3, and possibly Pulse Pro before 1.3.2, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) upload image files, (2) delete image files, or (3) create blocks. |
| Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a "combination of browser plugins and redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0447. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Control Virtual Machine Management before 6.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Seagate BlackArmor NAS 220 devices with firmware sg2000-2000.1331 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add user accounts via a crafted request to admin/access_control_user_add.php; (2) modify or (3) delete user accounts; (4) perform a factory reset; (5) perform a device reboot; or (6) add, (7) modify, or (8) delete shares and volumes. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Blue Coat ProxyAV appliance before 3.2.6.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change a password, (2) modify a policy, or (3) restart the device. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cgi-bin/users.cgi in Brickcom FB-100Ap, WCB-100Ap, MD-100Ap, WFB-100Ap, OB-100Ae, OSD-040E, and possibly other camera models with firmware 3.1.0.8 and earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Greenbone Security Assistant (GSA) before 2.0+rc3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that send email via an OMP request to OpenVAS Manager. NOTE: this issue can be leveraged to bypass authentication requirements for exploiting CVE-2011-0018. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the IndiaNIC Testimonial plugin 2.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a testimonial via an iNIC_testimonial_save action; (2) add a listing template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_listing_template action; (3) add a widget template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_widget action; insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (4) project_name, (5) project_url, (6) client_name, (7) client_city, (8) client_state, (9) description, (10) tags, (11) video_url, or (12) is_featured, (13) title, (14) widget_title, (15) no_of_testimonials, (16) filter_by_country, (17) filter_by_tags, or (18) widget_template parameter to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Node Limit Number module before 6.x-1.2 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users with the administer node limitnumber permission for requests that delete limits. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SENCHA SNS before 1.0.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in saveAccountSubTab.imss in Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Suite 7.1-Build_Win32_1394 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create admin accounts via a saveAuth action. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the admin/editor console in Apache Roller before 5.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admins or editors by leveraging the HTTP POST functionality. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in X7 Chat 2.0.5.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add a user to an arbitrary group via the users page in an adminpanel action to index.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ownCloud before 3.0.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via vectors involving contacts. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ProjectForge before 5.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via vectors related to (1) web/admin/, (2) web/core/, (3) web/dialog/, (4) web/fibu/, (5) web/mobile/, (6) web/task/, or (7) web/wicket/. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management interface in FreeIPA before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make configuration changes. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VaM Shop 1.6, 1.6.1, and probably earlier versions allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change user status via admin/customers.php or (2) change user permissions via admin/accounting.php. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in commonsettings.php in AlstraSoft Site Uptime Enterprise, possibly 5.4, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators. |
| The CSRF protection mechanism in Django through 1.2.7 and 1.3.x through 1.3.1 does not properly handle web-server configurations supporting arbitrary HTTP Host headers, which allows remote attackers to trigger unauthenticated forged requests via vectors involving a DNS CNAME record and a web page containing JavaScript code. |