Search Results (108884 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-4531 1 Esterox 1 Business Card 2025-05-01 7.1 High
The Business Card WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions such as editing cards via CSRF attacks
CVE-2024-37032 1 Ollama 1 Ollama 2025-05-01 8.8 High
Ollama before 0.1.34 does not validate the format of the digest (sha256 with 64 hex digits) when getting the model path, and thus mishandles the TestGetBlobsPath test cases such as fewer than 64 hex digits, more than 64 hex digits, or an initial ../ substring.
CVE-2022-39037 1 Flowring 1 Agentflow 2025-05-01 7.5 High
Agentflow BPM file download function has a path traversal vulnerability. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to bypass authentication and download arbitrary system files.
CVE-2022-38387 2 Ibm, Linux 2 Cloud Pak For Security, Linux Kernel 2025-05-01 7.1 High
IBM Cloud Pak for Security (CP4S) 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.2.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request. IBM X-Force ID: 233786.
CVE-2022-41211 1 Sap 2 3d Visual Enterprise Author, 3d Visual Enterprise Viewer 2025-05-01 7 High
Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens manipulated file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Author and SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Viewer, Arbitrary Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces:Re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory. The accessed memory must be filled with code to execute the attack. Therefore, repeated success is unlikely.Stack-based buffer overflow. Since the memory overwritten is random, based on access rights of the memory, repeated success is not assured.
CVE-2022-38385 2 Ibm, Linux 2 Cloud Pak For Security, Linux Kernel 2025-05-01 7.1 High
IBM Cloud Pak for Security (CP4S) 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.2.0 could allow an authenticated user to obtain highly sensitive information or perform unauthorized actions due to improper input validation. IBM X-Force ID: 233777.
CVE-2020-8887 1 Telestream 2 Medius, Sentry 2025-05-01 7.5 High
Telestream Tektronix Medius before 10.7.5 and Sentry before 10.7.5 have a SQL injection vulnerability allowing an unauthenticated attacker to dump database contents via the page parameter in a page=login request to index.php (aka the server login page).
CVE-2023-33676 2 Oretnom23, Sourcecodester 2 Lost And Found Information System, Lost And Found Information System 2025-05-01 8.4 High
Sourcecodester Lost and Found Information System's Version 1.0 is vulnerable to unauthenticated SQL Injection at "?page=items/view&id=*" which can be escalated to the remote command execution.
CVE-2024-28754 1 Raspap 1 Raspap 2025-05-01 7.5 High
RaspAP (aka raspap-webgui) through 3.0.9 allows remote attackers to cause a persistent denial of service (bricking) via a crafted request.
CVE-2024-1068 1 Ajexperience 1 404 Solution 2025-05-01 7.2 High
The 404 Solution WordPress plugin before 2.35.8 does not properly sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL statement, leading to a SQL injection exploitable by high privilege users such as admins.
CVE-2024-38275 1 Moodle 1 Moodle 2025-04-30 7.5 High
The cURL wrapper in Moodle retained the original request headers when following redirects, so HTTP authorization header information could be unintentionally sent in requests to redirect URLs.
CVE-2024-21892 3 Linux, Nodejs, Redhat 4 Linux Kernel, Node.js, Enterprise Linux and 1 more 2025-04-30 7.8 High
On Linux, Node.js ignores certain environment variables if those may have been set by an unprivileged user while the process is running with elevated privileges with the only exception of CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE. Due to a bug in the implementation of this exception, Node.js incorrectly applies this exception even when certain other capabilities have been set. This allows unprivileged users to inject code that inherits the process's elevated privileges.
CVE-2024-21891 2 Nodejs, Redhat 3 Node.js, Nodejs, Enterprise Linux 2025-04-30 8.8 High
Node.js depends on multiple built-in utility functions to normalize paths provided to node:fs functions, which can be overwitten with user-defined implementations leading to filesystem permission model bypass through path traversal attack. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20 and Node.js 21. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js.
CVE-2022-32223 2 Microsoft, Nodejs 2 Windows, Node.js 2025-04-30 7.3 High
Node.js is vulnerable to Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Hijacking under certain conditions on Windows platforms.This vulnerability can be exploited if the victim has the following dependencies on a Windows machine:* OpenSSL has been installed and “C:\Program Files\Common Files\SSL\openssl.cnf” exists.Whenever the above conditions are present, `node.exe` will search for `providers.dll` in the current user directory.After that, `node.exe` will try to search for `providers.dll` by the DLL Search Order in Windows.It is possible for an attacker to place the malicious file `providers.dll` under a variety of paths and exploit this vulnerability.
CVE-2022-32212 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Nodejs and 2 more 7 Debian Linux, Fedora, Node.js and 4 more 2025-04-30 8.1 High
A OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in Node.js versions <14.20.0, <16.20.0, <18.5.0 due to an insufficient IsAllowedHost check that can easily be bypassed because IsIPAddress does not properly check if an IP address is invalid before making DBS requests allowing rebinding attacks.
CVE-2022-21824 5 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more 16 Debian Linux, Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 13 more 2025-04-30 8.2 High
Due to the formatting logic of the "console.table()" function it was not safe to allow user controlled input to be passed to the "properties" parameter while simultaneously passing a plain object with at least one property as the first parameter, which could be "__proto__". The prototype pollution has very limited control, in that it only allows an empty string to be assigned to numerical keys of the object prototype.Node.js >= 12.22.9, >= 14.18.3, >= 16.13.2, and >= 17.3.1 use a null protoype for the object these properties are being assigned to.
CVE-2021-44531 3 Nodejs, Oracle, Redhat 13 Node.js, Graalvm, Mysql Cluster and 10 more 2025-04-30 7.4 High
Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.
CVE-2021-22940 6 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 3 more 10 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 7 more 2025-04-30 7.5 High
Node.js before 16.6.1, 14.17.5, and 12.22.5 is vulnerable to a use after free attack where an attacker might be able to exploit the memory corruption, to change process behavior.
CVE-2021-22921 3 Microsoft, Nodejs, Siemens 3 Windows, Node.js, Sinec Infrastructure Network Services 2025-04-30 7.8 High
Node.js before 16.4.1, 14.17.2, and 12.22.2 is vulnerable to local privilege escalation attacks under certain conditions on Windows platforms. More specifically, improper configuration of permissions in the installation directory allows an attacker to perform two different escalation attacks: PATH and DLL hijacking.
CVE-2021-22884 6 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Nodejs and 3 more 16 Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager, E-series Performance Analyzer and 13 more 2025-04-30 7.5 High
Node.js before 10.24.0, 12.21.0, 14.16.0, and 15.10.0 is vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks as the whitelist includes “localhost6”. When “localhost6” is not present in /etc/hosts, it is just an ordinary domain that is resolved via DNS, i.e., over network. If the attacker controls the victim's DNS server or can spoof its responses, the DNS rebinding protection can be bypassed by using the “localhost6” domain. As long as the attacker uses the “localhost6” domain, they can still apply the attack described in CVE-2018-7160.