| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
|
IBM Db2U 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 237210.
|
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Vladimir Anokhin's Shortcodes Ultimate plugin <= 5.12.0 on WordPress. |
| The WAVLINK Quantum D4G (WN531G3) running firmware version M31G3.V5030.200325 does not utilize anti-CSRF tokens, which, when combined with other issues (such as CVE-2022-35518), can lead to remote, unauthenticated command execution. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo PXM30-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM30.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W100-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W100-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W200-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W200-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41). A Cross-Site Request Forgery exists in the “Import Files“ functionality of the “Operation” web application due to the missing validation of anti-CSRF tokens or other origin checks. A remote unauthenticated attacker can upload and enable permanent arbitrary JavaScript code into the device just by convincing a victim to visit a specifically crafted webpage while logged-in to the device web application. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo PXM30-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM30.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W100-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W100-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W200-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W200-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41). A Cross-Site Request Forgery exists in endpoints of the “Operation” web application that interpret and execute Axon language queries, due to the missing validation of anti-CSRF tokens or other origin checks. By convincing a victim to click on a malicious link or visit a specifically crafted webpage while logged-in to the device web application, a remote unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary Axon queries against the device. |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in SourceCodester Simple Cold Storage Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /csms/?page=contact_us of the component Contact Us. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-211194 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. |
| A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Cold Storage Management System 1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument change password leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-211189 was assigned to this vulnerability. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.5. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.3. |
| The Simple File List WordPress plugin before 4.4.12 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin create new page and change it's content via a CSRF attack. |
| The Woo Billingo Plus WordPress plugin before 4.4.5.4, Integration for Billingo & Gravity Forms WordPress plugin before 1.0.4, Integration for Szamlazz.hu & Gravity Forms WordPress plugin before 1.2.7 are lacking CSRF checks in various AJAX actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in Shop Managers and above perform unwanted actions, such as deactivate the plugin's license |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository froxlor/froxlor prior to 0.10.38. |
| Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Samsung Kies prior to version 2.6.4.22074 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction. |
| Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Smart Switch PC prior to version 4.3.22083 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction. |
| Cross-site request forgery attacks can be carried out against the Eyes of Network web application, due to an absence of adequate protections. An attacker can, for instance, delete the admin user by directing an authenticated user to the URL https://<target-address>/module/admin_user/index.php?DataTables_Table_0_length=10&user_selected%5B%5D=1&user_mgt_list=delete_user&action=submit by means of a crafted link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Mantenimiento web plugin <= 0.13 on WordPress. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Metagauss Download Theme plugin <= 1.0.9 versions. |
| In ftcms 2.1, there is a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the PHP page, which causes the attacker to forge a link to trick him to click on a malicious link or visit a page containing attack code, and send a request to the server (corresponding to the identity authentication information) as the victim without the victim's knowledge. |
| An issue was discovered in the webmail component in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. When using preauth, CSRF tokens are not checked on some POST endpoints. Thus, when an authenticated user views an attacker-controlled page, a request will be sent to the application that appears to be intended. The CSRF token is omitted from the request, but the request still succeeds. |
| In Progress WS_FTP Server prior to version 8.7.3, forms within the administrative interface did not include a nonce to mitigate the risk of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. |
