Export limit exceeded: 16316 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2710 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-30522 | 1 Stefanno Lissa | 1 Newsletter | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in Stefano Lissa & The Newsletter Team Newsletter allows Functionality Bypass.This issue affects Newsletter: from n/a through 8.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8616 | 1 Opentext | 1 Advanced Authentication | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A weakness identified in OpenText Advanced Authentication where a Malicious browser plugin can record and replay the user authentication process to bypass Authentication. This issue affects Advanced Authentication on or before 6.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7383 | 1 Redhat | 2 Advanced Virtualization, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in libnbd. The client did not always correctly verify the NBD server's certificate when using TLS to connect to an NBD server. This issue allows a man-in-the-middle attack on NBD traffic. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48915 | 1 Astroxnetwork | 1 Agent Dart | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Agent Dart is an agent library built for Internet Computer for Dart and Flutter apps. Prior to version 1.0.0-dev.29, certificate verification in `lib/agent/certificate.dart` does not occur properly. During the delegation verification in the `_checkDelegation` function, the canister_ranges aren't verified. The impact of not checking the canister_ranges is that a subnet can sign canister responses in behalf of another subnet. The certificate’s timestamp, i.e /time path, is also not verified, meaning that the certificate effectively has no expiration time. Version 1.0.0-dev.29 implements appropriate certificate verification. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10548 | 1 Clevercontrol | 1 Clevercontrol | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| The CleverControl employee monitoring software (v11.5.1041.6) fails to validate TLS server certificates during the installation process. The installer downloads and executes external components using curl.exe --insecure, enabling a man-in-the-middle attacker to deliver malicious files that are executed with SYSTEM privileges. This can lead to full remote code execution with administrative rights. No patch is available as the vendor has been unresponsive. It is assumed that previous versions are also affected, but this is not confirmed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6026 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Universal Device Client | 2026-04-15 | 3.1 Low |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo Universal Device Client (UDC) that could allow a user capable of intercepting network traffic to obtain application metadata, including device information, geolocation, and telemetry data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6030 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Use of fixed learning codes, one code to lock the car and the other code to unlock it, in the Key Fob Transmitter in Cyclone Matrix TRF Smart Keyless Entry System, which allows a replay attack. Research was completed on the 2024 KIA Soluto. Attack confirmed on other KIA Models in Ecuador. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60868 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| The Alt Redirect 1.6.3 addon for Statamic fails to consistently strip query string parameters when the "Query String Strip" feature is enabled. Case variations, encoded keys, and duplicates are not removed, allowing attackers to bypass sanitization. This may lead to cache poisoning, parameter pollution, or denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41724 | 2026-04-15 | 8.7 High | ||
| Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295) in the Gallagher Command Centre SALTO integration allowed an attacker to spoof the SALTO server. This issue affects all versions of Gallagher Command Centre prior to 9.20.1043. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65083 | 1 Tinexta Infocert | 1 Gosign Desktop | 2026-04-15 | 3.2 Low |
| GoSign Desktop through 2.4.1 disables TLS certificate validation when configured to use a proxy server. This can be problematic if the GoSign Desktop user selects an arbitrary proxy server without consideration of whether outbound HTTPS connections from the proxy server to Internet servers succeed even for untrusted or invalid server certificates. In this scenario (which is outside of the product's design objectives), integrity protection could be bypassed. In typical cases of a proxy server for outbound HTTPS traffic from an enterprise, those connections would not succeed. (Admittedly, the usual expectation is that a client application is configured to trust an enterprise CA and does not set SSL_VERIFY_NONE.) Also, it is of course unsafe to place ~/.gosign in the home directory of an untrusted user and then have other users execute downloaded files. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8935 | 1 Schneider-electric | 3 Modicon M340 Bmxp341000, Modicon Mc80 Bmkc8020301, Modicon Momentum Unity M1e Processor | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability exists that could cause a denial of service and loss of confidentiality and integrity of controllers when conducting a Man-In-The-Middle attack between the controller and the engineering workstation while a valid user is establishing a communication session. This vulnerability is inherent to Diffie Hellman algorithm which does not protect against Man-In-The-Middle attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62375 | 1 Go-witness | 1 Go-witness | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| go-witness and witness are Go modules for generating attestations. In go-witness versions 0.8.6 and earlier and witness versions 0.9.2 and earlier the AWS attestor improperly verifies AWS EC2 instance identity documents. Verification can incorrectly succeed when a signature is not present or is empty, and when RSA signature verification fails. The attestor also embeds a single legacy global AWS public certificate and does not account for newer region specific certificates issued in 2024, making detection of forged documents difficult without additional trusted region data. An attacker able to supply or intercept instance identity document data (such as through Instance Metadata Service impersonation) can cause a forged identity document to be accepted, leading to incorrect trust decisions based on the attestation. This is fixed in go-witness 0.9.1 and witness 0.10.1. As a workaround, manually verify the included identity document, signature, and public key with standard tools (for example openssl) following AWS’s verification guidance, or disable use of the AWS attestor until upgraded. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22030 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher that can be exploited in narrow circumstances through a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. An attacker would need to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30144 | 1 Nearform | 1 Fast-jwt | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. Prior to 5.0.6, the fast-jwt library does not properly validate the iss claim based on the RFC 7519. The iss (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid iss value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an iss claim structured as ['https://attacker-domain/', 'https://valid-iss']. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid. Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like get-jwks that do not independently validate the iss claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the iss array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks. This issue is fixed in 5.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21543 | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High | ||
| Versions of the package djoser before 2.3.0 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass when the authenticate() function fails. This is because the system falls back to querying the database directly, granting access to users with valid credentials, and eventually bypassing custom authentication checks such as two-factor authentication, LDAP validations, or requirements from configured AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21542 | 1 Spotify | 1 Luigi | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| Versions of the package luigi before 3.6.0 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Write via Archive Extraction (Zip Slip) due to improper destination file path validation in the _extract_packages_archive function. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5445 | 2026-04-15 | 3.8 Low | ||
| Ecosystem Agent version 4 < 4.1.5.2597 and Ecosystem Agent version 5 < 5.1.4.2473 did not properly validate SSL/TLS certificates, which could allow a malicious actor to perform a Man-in-the-Middle and intercept traffic between the agent and N-able servers from a privileged network position. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13061 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Electronic Official Document Management System from 2100 Technology has an Authentication Bypass vulnerability. Although the product enforces an IP whitelist for the API used to query user tokens, unauthenticated remote attackers can still deceive the server to obtain tokens of arbitrary users, which can then be used to log into the system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12839 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The login mechanism via device authentication of CGFIDO from Changing Information Technology has an Authentication Bypass vulnerability. If a user visits a forged website, the agent program deployed on their device will send an authentication signature to the website. An unauthenticated remote attacker who obtains this signature can use it to log into the system with any device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9785 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| PaperCut Print Deploy is an optional component that integrates with PaperCut NG/MF which simplifies printer deployment and management. When the component is deployed to an environment, the customer has an option to configure the system to use a self-signed certificate. If the customer does not fully configure the system to leverage the trust database on the clients, it opens up the communication between clients and the server to man-in-the-middle attacks. It was discovered that certain parts of the documentation related to the configuration of SSL in Print Deploy were lacking, which could potentially contribute to a misconfiguration of the Print Deploy client installation. PaperCut strongly recommends to use valid certificates to secure installations and to follow the updated documentation to ensure the correct SSL configuration. Those who use private CAs and/or self-signed certificates should make sure to copy their Certification Authority certificate, or their self signed certificate if using only one, to the trust store of their operating system and to the Java key store | ||||