| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The console in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allows remote attackers to read stack traces by triggering (1) an error or (2) an exception. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.2 allow remote attackers to inject links and trigger unintended navigation or actions via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.2.4 and Sterling File Gateway allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| XMLscanner.java in Apache Xerces2 Java Parser before 2.12.0, as used in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in IBM Java 5.0 before 5.0 SR16-FP3, 6 before 6 SR14, 6.0.1 before 6.0.1 SR6, and 7 before 7 SR5 as well as Oracle Java SE 7u40 and earlier, Java SE 6u60 and earlier, Java SE 5.0u51 and earlier, JRockit R28.2.8 and earlier, JRockit R27.7.6 and earlier, Java SE Embedded 7u40 and earlier, and possibly other products allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via vectors related to XML attribute names. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 do not properly restrict file types and extensions, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted filename. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 do not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameters. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2983. |
| An unspecified third-party component in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 uses short session ID values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack sessions, and consequently obtain sensitive information, via a brute-force attack. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-2987, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, and CVE-2013-0567. |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allows remote authenticated users to read or modify files via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via vectors involving the RNVisibility page and unspecified screens, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0560. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.2 do not invalidate a session upon a logout action, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging an unattended workstation. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 5.1 and 5.2 and Sterling File Gateway 2.1 and 2.2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information about application implementation via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0463, CVE-2013-2985, CVE-2013-3020, CVE-2013-0568, CVE-2013-0475, and CVE-2013-0567. |