| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| PrinterLogic Web Stack versions 19.1.1.13 SP9 and below deserializes attacker controlled leading to pre-auth remote code execution. |
| The org.h2.util.JdbcUtils.getConnection method of the H2 database takes as parameters the class name of the driver and URL of the database. An attacker may pass a JNDI driver name and a URL leading to a LDAP or RMI servers, causing remote code execution. This can be exploited through various attack vectors, most notably through the H2 Console which leads to unauthenticated remote code execution. |
| An attacker-controlled pointer free in Busybox's hush applet leads to denial of service and possible code execution when processing a crafted shell command, due to the shell mishandling the &&& string. This may be used for remote code execution under rare conditions of filtered command input. |
| The WordPress Popular Posts WordPress plugin is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to insufficient input file type validation found in the ~/src/Image.php file which makes it possible for attackers with contributor level access and above to upload malicious files that can be used to obtain remote code execution, in versions up to and including 5.3.2. |
| An issue was discovered in the Dask distributed package before 2021.10.0 for Python. Single machine Dask clusters started with dask.distributed.LocalCluster or dask.distributed.Client (which defaults to using LocalCluster) would mistakenly configure their respective Dask workers to listen on external interfaces (typically with a randomly selected high port) rather than only on localhost. A Dask cluster created using this method (when running on a machine that has an applicable port exposed) could be used by a sophisticated attacker to achieve remote code execution. |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Seowon 130-SLC router all versions as of 2021-09-15 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via the queriesCnt parameter. |
| Zoho ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus before 4421 is vulnerable to file-upload remote code execution. |
| An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. The Form functionality allows remote code execution because deserialization is mishandled. |
| Zoho ManageEngine ADManager Plus before 7115 is vulnerable to a filter bypass that leads to file-upload remote code execution. |
| The in-memory certificate cache in strongSwan before 5.9.4 has a remote integer overflow upon receiving many requests with different certificates to fill the cache and later trigger the replacement of cache entries. The code attempts to select a less-often-used cache entry by means of a random number generator, but this is not done correctly. Remote code execution might be a slight possibility. |
| The gmp plugin in strongSwan before 5.9.4 has a remote integer overflow via a crafted certificate with an RSASSA-PSS signature. For example, this can be triggered by an unrelated self-signed CA certificate sent by an initiator. Remote code execution cannot occur. |
| In the SCEP Server of RouterOS in certain Mikrotik products, an attacker can trigger a heap-based buffer overflow that leads to remote code execution. The attacker must know the scep_server_name value. This affects RouterOS 6.46.8, 6.47.9, and 6.47.10. |
| Zoho ManageEngine Patch Connect Plus before 90099 is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution. |
