| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ActFax Server version 5.01. The server's RAW protocol interface fails to safely process user-supplied data in @F506 fax header fields due to insecure usage of strcpy. Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted @F506 fields, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires network access to TCP port 4559 and does not require authentication. |
| A vulnerability was detected in Axosoft Scrum and Bug Tracking 22.1.1.11545. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Add Work Item Page. The manipulation of the argument Title results in csv injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| There is a potential OOB Write vulnerability in the gen_prov_start function in pb_adv.c. The full length of the received data is copied into the link.rx.buf receiver buffer without any validation on the data size. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1BE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/DC (6ES7211-1AE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1HE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1BE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1BG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1BG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1217C DC/DC/DC (6ES7217-1AG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2212-1AE40-1XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2214-1AG40-1XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AF40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HF40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AF40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7). Affected devices do not process correctly certain special crafted packets sent to port 102/tcp, which could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service in the device. |
| OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Starting in version 5.2.0 and prior to version 5.4.0, the `lastIndexOf(bytes,byte,uint256)` function of the `Bytes.sol` library may access uninitialized memory when the following two conditions hold: 1) the provided buffer length is empty (i.e. `buffer.length == 0`) and position is not `2**256 - 1` (i.e. `pos != type(uint256).max`). The `pos` argument could be used to access arbitrary data outside of the buffer bounds. This could lead to the operation running out of gas, or returning an invalid index (outside of the empty buffer). Processing this invalid result for accessing the `buffer` would cause a revert under normal conditions. When triggered, the function reads memory at offset `buffer + 0x20 + pos`. If memory at that location (outside the `buffer`) matches the search pattern, the function would return an out of bound index instead of the expected `type(uint256).max`. This creates unexpected behavior where callers receive a valid-looking index pointing outside buffer bounds. Subsequent memory accesses that don't check bounds and use the returned index must carefully review the potential impact depending on their setup. Code relying on this function returning `type(uint256).max` for empty buffers or using the returned index without bounds checking could exhibit undefined behavior. Users should upgrade to version 5.4.0 to receive a patch. |
| A low privileged remote attacker can corrupt the webserver users storage on the device by setting a sequence of unsupported characters which leads to deletion of all previously configured users and the creation of the default Administrator with a known default password. |
| The websocket handler is vulnerable to a denial of service condition. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted websocket message to trigger the issue without affecting the core functionality. |
| The webserver is vulnerable to a denial of service condition. An unauthenticated remote attacker can craft a special GET request with an over-long content-length to trigger the issue without affecting the core functionality. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfs: fix out of bounds memory read error in symlink repair
xfs/286 produced this report on my test fleet:
==================================================================
BUG: KFENCE: out-of-bounds read in memcpy_orig+0x54/0x110
Out-of-bounds read at 0xffff88843fe9e038 (184B right of kfence-#184):
memcpy_orig+0x54/0x110
xrep_symlink_salvage_inline+0xb3/0xf0 [xfs]
xrep_symlink_salvage+0x100/0x110 [xfs]
xrep_symlink+0x2e/0x80 [xfs]
xrep_attempt+0x61/0x1f0 [xfs]
xfs_scrub_metadata+0x34f/0x5c0 [xfs]
xfs_ioc_scrubv_metadata+0x387/0x560 [xfs]
xfs_file_ioctl+0xe23/0x10e0 [xfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x76/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x1e0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
kfence-#184: 0xffff88843fe9df80-0xffff88843fe9dfea, size=107, cache=kmalloc-128
allocated by task 3470 on cpu 1 at 263329.131592s (192823.508886s ago):
xfs_init_local_fork+0x79/0xe0 [xfs]
xfs_iformat_local+0xa4/0x170 [xfs]
xfs_iformat_data_fork+0x148/0x180 [xfs]
xfs_inode_from_disk+0x2cd/0x480 [xfs]
xfs_iget+0x450/0xd60 [xfs]
xfs_bulkstat_one_int+0x6b/0x510 [xfs]
xfs_bulkstat_iwalk+0x1e/0x30 [xfs]
xfs_iwalk_ag_recs+0xdf/0x150 [xfs]
xfs_iwalk_run_callbacks+0xb9/0x190 [xfs]
xfs_iwalk_ag+0x1dc/0x2f0 [xfs]
xfs_iwalk_args.constprop.0+0x6a/0x120 [xfs]
xfs_iwalk+0xa4/0xd0 [xfs]
xfs_bulkstat+0xfa/0x170 [xfs]
xfs_ioc_fsbulkstat.isra.0+0x13a/0x230 [xfs]
xfs_file_ioctl+0xbf2/0x10e0 [xfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x76/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x1e0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1300113 Comm: xfs_scrub Not tainted 6.18.0-rc4-djwx #rc4 PREEMPT(lazy) 3d744dd94e92690f00a04398d2bd8631dcef1954
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.0-4.module+el8.8.0+21164+ed375313 04/01/2014
==================================================================
On further analysis, I realized that the second parameter to min() is
not correct. xfs_ifork::if_bytes is the size of the xfs_ifork::if_data
buffer. if_bytes can be smaller than the data fork size because:
(a) the forkoff code tries to keep the data area as large as possible
(b) for symbolic links, if_bytes is the ondisk file size + 1
(c) forkoff is always a multiple of 8.
Case in point: for a single-byte symlink target, forkoff will be
8 but the buffer will only be 2 bytes long.
In other words, the logic here is wrong and we walk off the end of the
incore buffer. Fix that. |
| An insufficient DRAM address validation in PMFW may allow a privileged attacker to perform a DMA read from an invalid DRAM address to SRAM, potentially resulting in loss of data integrity. |
| Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input vulnerability in ABB FLXEON.This issue affects FLXEON: through 9.3.5. |
| The SAP Approuter Node.js package version v16.7.1 and before is vulnerable to Authentication bypass. When trading an authorization code an attacker can steal the session of the victim by injecting malicious payload causing High impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application |
| ChaosPro 2.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the configuration file path handling that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by overwriting the Structured Exception Handler. Attackers can craft a malicious configuration file with carefully constructed payload to overwrite memory and gain remote code execution on vulnerable Windows XP systems. |
| Out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in Sharp Corporation and Toshiba Tec Corporation multiple MFPs (multifunction printers), which may lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. |
| The web interface of the affected devices process some crafted HTTP requests improperly, leading to a device crash. More precisely, a crafted parameter to billcodedef_sub_sel.html is not processed properly and device-crash happens. As for the details of affected product names, model numbers, and versions, refer to the information provided by the respective vendors listed under [References]. |
| An improper parsing vulnerability was reported in the FileZ client that could allow a crafted file in the FileZ directory to read arbitrary files on the device due to URL preloading. |
| Remote Desktop Audit 2.3.0.157 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code during the Add Computers Wizard file import process. Attackers can craft a malicious payload file to trigger a structured exception handler (SEH) bypass and execute shellcode when importing computer lists. |
| An unauthorised attacker within bluetooth range may use an improper validation during the BLE connection request to deadlock the affected devices. |
| NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows contains a vulnerability in the user mode layer, where an unprivileged regular user can cause an out-of-bounds read. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering. |
| NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows contains a vulnerability in the user mode layer, where an unprivileged regular user can cause an out-of-bounds read. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering. |
