Filtered by vendor Openssl
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openssl
Subscriptions
Total
264 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-3512 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in crypto/srp/srp_lib.c in the SRP implementation in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via an invalid SRP (1) g, (2) A, or (3) B parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2180 | 3 Openssl, Oracle, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Linux, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The TS_OBJ_print_bio function in crypto/ts/ts_lib.c in the X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP) implementation in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted time-stamp file that is mishandled by the "openssl ts" command. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0207 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The dtls1_listen function in d1_lib.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly isolate the state information of independent data streams, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted DTLS traffic, as demonstrated by DTLS 1.0 traffic to a DTLS 1.2 server. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0285 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The ssl3_client_hello function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not ensure that the PRNG is seeded before proceeding with a handshake, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by sniffing the network and then conducting a brute-force attack. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3193 | 3 Canonical, Nodejs, Openssl | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Node.js, Openssl | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| The Montgomery squaring implementation in crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-mont5.pl in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e on the x86_64 platform, as used by the BN_mod_exp function, mishandles carry propagation and produces incorrect output, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive private-key information via an attack against use of a (1) Diffie-Hellman (DH) or (2) Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral (DHE) ciphersuite. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0701 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not ensure that prime numbers are appropriate for Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover a private DH exponent by making multiple handshakes with a peer that chose an inappropriate number, as demonstrated by a number in an X9.42 file. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0798 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Memory leak in the SRP_VBASE_get_by_user implementation in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by providing an invalid username in a connection attempt, related to apps/s_server.c and crypto/srp/srp_vfy.c. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4109 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8s, when X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is enabled, allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact by triggering failure of a policy check. | ||||
| CVE-2006-7250 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The mime_hdr_cmp function in crypto/asn1/asn_mime.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8t and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted S/MIME message. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0740 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The ssl3_get_record function in ssl/s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8f through 0.9.8m allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed record in a TLS connection that triggers a NULL pointer dereference, related to the minor version number. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | ||||
| CVE-2011-3207 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.x before 1.0.0e does not initialize certain structure members, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass CRL validation by using a nextUpdate value corresponding to a time in the past. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7270 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8j, when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled, does not prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache, which allows remote attackers to force the use of a disabled cipher via vectors involving sniffing network traffic to discover a session identifier, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4180. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0928 | 3 Gaisler, Openssl, Xilinx | 3 Leon3 Soc, Openssl, Virtex-ii Pro Fpga | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.8i on the Gaisler Research LEON3 SoC on the Xilinx Virtex-II Pro FPGA uses a Fixed Width Exponentiation (FWE) algorithm for certain signature calculations, and does not verify the signature before providing it to a caller, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to determine the private key via a modified supply voltage for the microprocessor, related to a "fault-based attack." | ||||
| CVE-2010-2939 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Double free vulnerability in the ssl3_get_key_exchange function in the OpenSSL client (ssl/s3_clnt.c) in OpenSSL 1.0.0a, 0.9.8, 0.9.7, and possibly other versions, when using ECDH, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted private key with an invalid prime. NOTE: some sources refer to this as a use-after-free issue. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1945 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) subsystem in OpenSSL 1.0.0d and earlier, when the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) is used for the ECDHE_ECDSA cipher suite, does not properly implement curves over binary fields, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to determine private keys via a timing attack and a lattice calculation. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4354 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| crypto/bn/bn_nist.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8h on 32-bit platforms, as used in stunnel and other products, in certain circumstances involving ECDH or ECDHE cipher suites, uses an incorrect modular reduction algorithm in its implementation of the P-256 and P-384 NIST elliptic curves, which allows remote attackers to obtain the private key of a TLS server via multiple handshake attempts. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0027 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The GOST ENGINE in OpenSSL before 1.0.0f does not properly handle invalid parameters for the GOST block cipher, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via crafted data from a TLS client. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1165 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The mime_param_cmp function in crypto/asn1/asn_mime.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8u and 1.x before 1.0.0h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted S/MIME message, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-7250. | ||||
| CVE-2012-2686 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| crypto/evp/e_aes_cbc_hmac_sha1.c in the AES-NI functionality in the TLS 1.1 and 1.2 implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1d allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted CBC data. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1473 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5094. NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment | ||||