Filtered by vendor Openssl
Subscriptions
Total
265 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-3512 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in crypto/srp/srp_lib.c in the SRP implementation in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via an invalid SRP (1) g, (2) A, or (3) B parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2180 | 3 Openssl, Oracle, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Linux, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The TS_OBJ_print_bio function in crypto/ts/ts_lib.c in the X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP) implementation in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted time-stamp file that is mishandled by the "openssl ts" command. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0207 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The dtls1_listen function in d1_lib.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly isolate the state information of independent data streams, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted DTLS traffic, as demonstrated by DTLS 1.0 traffic to a DTLS 1.2 server. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0285 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The ssl3_client_hello function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not ensure that the PRNG is seeded before proceeding with a handshake, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by sniffing the network and then conducting a brute-force attack. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3193 | 3 Canonical, Nodejs, Openssl | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Node.js, Openssl | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| The Montgomery squaring implementation in crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-mont5.pl in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e on the x86_64 platform, as used by the BN_mod_exp function, mishandles carry propagation and produces incorrect output, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive private-key information via an attack against use of a (1) Diffie-Hellman (DH) or (2) Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral (DHE) ciphersuite. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0701 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not ensure that prime numbers are appropriate for Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover a private DH exponent by making multiple handshakes with a peer that chose an inappropriate number, as demonstrated by a number in an X9.42 file. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0798 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Memory leak in the SRP_VBASE_get_by_user implementation in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by providing an invalid username in a connection attempt, related to apps/s_server.c and crypto/srp/srp_vfy.c. | ||||
| CVE-2011-3210 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The ephemeral ECDH ciphersuite functionality in OpenSSL 0.9.8 through 0.9.8r and 1.0.x before 1.0.0e does not ensure thread safety during processing of handshake messages from clients, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via out-of-order messages that violate the TLS protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2006-7250 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The mime_hdr_cmp function in crypto/asn1/asn_mime.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8t and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted S/MIME message. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0740 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The ssl3_get_record function in ssl/s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8f through 0.9.8m allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed record in a TLS connection that triggers a NULL pointer dereference, related to the minor version number. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | ||||
| CVE-2011-3207 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.x before 1.0.0e does not initialize certain structure members, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass CRL validation by using a nextUpdate value corresponding to a time in the past. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7270 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8j, when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled, does not prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache, which allows remote attackers to force the use of a disabled cipher via vectors involving sniffing network traffic to discover a session identifier, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4180. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0928 | 3 Gaisler, Openssl, Xilinx | 3 Leon3 Soc, Openssl, Virtex-ii Pro Fpga | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.8i on the Gaisler Research LEON3 SoC on the Xilinx Virtex-II Pro FPGA uses a Fixed Width Exponentiation (FWE) algorithm for certain signature calculations, and does not verify the signature before providing it to a caller, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to determine the private key via a modified supply voltage for the microprocessor, related to a "fault-based attack." | ||||
| CVE-2010-2939 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Double free vulnerability in the ssl3_get_key_exchange function in the OpenSSL client (ssl/s3_clnt.c) in OpenSSL 1.0.0a, 0.9.8, 0.9.7, and possibly other versions, when using ECDH, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted private key with an invalid prime. NOTE: some sources refer to this as a use-after-free issue. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1945 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) subsystem in OpenSSL 1.0.0d and earlier, when the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) is used for the ECDHE_ECDSA cipher suite, does not properly implement curves over binary fields, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to determine private keys via a timing attack and a lattice calculation. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4354 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| crypto/bn/bn_nist.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8h on 32-bit platforms, as used in stunnel and other products, in certain circumstances involving ECDH or ECDHE cipher suites, uses an incorrect modular reduction algorithm in its implementation of the P-256 and P-384 NIST elliptic curves, which allows remote attackers to obtain the private key of a TLS server via multiple handshake attempts. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0027 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The GOST ENGINE in OpenSSL before 1.0.0f does not properly handle invalid parameters for the GOST block cipher, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via crafted data from a TLS client. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1165 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The mime_param_cmp function in crypto/asn1/asn_mime.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8u and 1.x before 1.0.0h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted S/MIME message, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-7250. | ||||
| CVE-2012-2686 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| crypto/evp/e_aes_cbc_hmac_sha1.c in the AES-NI functionality in the TLS 1.1 and 1.2 implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1d allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted CBC data. | ||||
| CVE-2011-1473 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5094. NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment | ||||