Search Results (678 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-22463 1 Dell 1 Powerscale Onefs 2026-02-20 7.4 High
Dell PowerScale OneFS 8.2.x through 9.6.0.x contains a use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm vulnerability. A remote unprivileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to compromise of confidentiality and integrity of sensitive information
CVE-2025-49756 1 Microsoft 3 365, 365 Apps, Office 365 2026-02-13 3.3 Low
Use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm in Office Developer Platform allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
CVE-2025-52026 1 Aptsys 2 Gemscms, Gemscms Backend 2026-02-12 7.5 High
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.
CVE-2024-30098 1 Microsoft 22 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 19 more 2026-02-10 7.5 High
Windows Cryptographic Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
CVE-2025-58743 2 Microsoft, Milner 2 Windows, Imagedirector Capture 2026-02-10 7.5 High
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm (DES) vulnerability in the Password class in C2SConnections.dll in Milner ImageDirector Capture on Windows allows Encryption Brute Forcing to obtain database credentials.This issue affects ImageDirector Capture: from 7.0.9.0 before 7.6.3.25808.
CVE-2025-27458 1 Endress 2 Meac300-fnade4, Meac300-fnade4 Firmware 2026-02-06 6.5 Medium
The VNC authentication mechanism bases on a challenge-response system where both server and client use the same password for encryption. The challenge is sent from the server to the client, is encrypted by the client and sent back. The server does the same encryption locally and if the responses match it is prooven that the client knows the correct password. Since all VNC communication is unencrypted, an attacker can obtain the challenge and response and try to derive the password from this information.
CVE-2025-49196 1 Sick 1 Field Analytics 2026-01-26 6.5 Medium
A service supports the use of a deprecated and unsafe TLS version. This could be exploited to expose sensitive information, modify data in unexpected ways or spoof identities of other users or devices, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the device.
CVE-2025-68931 1 Samrocketman 1 Jervis 2026-01-20 7.5 High
Jervis is a library for Job DSL plugin scripts and shared Jenkins pipeline libraries. Prior to 2.2, AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding lacks authentication, making it vulnerable to padding oracle attacks and ciphertext manipulation. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.
CVE-2025-68702 1 Samrocketman 1 Jervis 2026-01-20 7.5 High
Jervis is a library for Job DSL plugin scripts and shared Jenkins pipeline libraries. Prior to 2.2, Jervis uses padLeft(32, '0') when it should use padLeft(64, '0') because SHA-256 produces 32 bytes which equates to 64 hex characters. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.
CVE-2025-68701 1 Samrocketman 1 Jervis 2026-01-20 7.5 High
Jervis is a library for Job DSL plugin scripts and shared Jenkins pipeline libraries. Prior to 2.2, Jervis uses deterministic AES IV derivation from a passphrase. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.
CVE-2025-68698 1 Samrocketman 1 Jervis 2026-01-20 7.5 High
Jervis is a library for Job DSL plugin scripts and shared Jenkins pipeline libraries. Prior to 2.2, Jervis uses PKCS1Encoding which is vulnerable to Bleichenbacher padding oracle attacks. Modern systems should use OAEP (Optimal Asymmetric Encryption Padding). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.
CVE-2024-39583 1 Dell 2 Insightiq, Powerscale Insightiq 2025-12-31 8.1 High
Dell PowerScale InsightIQ, versions 5.0 through 5.1, contains a Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges.
CVE-2025-65831 1 Meatmeet 1 Meatmeet 2025-12-30 7.5 High
The application uses an insecure hashing algorithm (MD5) to hash passwords. If an attacker obtained a copy of these hashes, either through exploiting cloud services, performing TLS downgrade attacks on the traffic from a mobile device, or through another means, they may be able to crack the hash in a reasonable amount of time and gain unauthorized access to the victim's account.
CVE-2021-47712 1 Kentico 1 Xperience 2025-12-24 7.5 High
A cryptography vulnerability in Kentico Xperience allows attackers to potentially manipulate URL hash values through existing hashing mechanisms. The hotfix introduces an additional security layer to prevent hash value reuse and potential exploitation.
CVE-2025-54981 1 Apache 1 Streampark 2025-12-15 7.5 High
Weak Encryption Algorithm in StreamPark, The use of an AES cipher in ECB mode and a weak random number generator for encrypting sensitive data, including JWT tokens, may have risked exposing sensitive authentication data This issue affects Apache StreamPark: from 2.0.0 before 2.1.7. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.1.7, which fixes the issue.
CVE-2021-33560 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Gnupg and 2 more 9 Debian Linux, Fedora, Libgcrypt and 6 more 2025-12-03 7.5 High
Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP.
CVE-2025-36150 1 Ibm 1 Concert 2025-12-01 5.9 Medium
IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 2.0.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information.
CVE-2025-64429 1 Duckdb 1 Duckdb 2025-11-25 6.5 Medium
DuckDB is a SQL database management system. DuckDB implemented block-based encryption of DB on the filesystem starting with DuckDB 1.4.0. There are a few issues related to this implementation. The DuckDB can fall back to an insecure random number generator (pcg32) to generate cryptographic keys or IVs. When clearing keys from memory, the compiler may remove the memset() and leave sensitive data on the heap. By modifying the database header, an attacker could downgrade the encryption mode from GCM to CTR to bypass integrity checks. There may be a failure to check return value on call to OpenSSL `rand_bytes()`. An attacker could use public IVs to compromise the internal state of RNG and determine the randomly generated key used to encrypt temporary files, get access to cryptographic keys if they have access to process memory (e.g. through memory leak),circumvent GCM integrity checks, and/or influence the OpenSSL random number generator and DuckDB would not be able to detect a failure of the generator. Version 1.4.2 has disabled the insecure random number generator by no longer using the fallback to write to or create databases. Instead, DuckDB will now attempt to install and load the OpenSSL implementation in the `httpfs` extension. DuckDB now uses secure MbedTLS primitive to clear memory as recommended and requires explicit specification of ciphers without integrity checks like CTR on `ATTACH`. Additionally, DuckDB now checks the return code.
CVE-2025-36161 2 Ibm, Linux 2 Concert, Linux Kernel 2025-11-24 5.9 Medium
IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 2.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict-Transport-Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques.
CVE-2025-54340 1 Desktopalert 2 Pingalert, Pingalert Application Server 2025-11-19 4.1 Medium
A vulnerability was found in the Application Server of Desktop Alert PingAlert version 6.1.0.11 to 6.1.1.2. There is a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm.