| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| OpenCTI 3.3.1 is vulnerable to a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack via the /graphql endpoint. An attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript code by sending a crafted GET request with a malicious payload in the query string, leading to execution of JavaScript in the victim's browser. For example, a request to /graphql?'"--></style></scRipt><scRipt>alert('Raif_Berkay')</scRipt> will trigger an alert. This vulnerability was discovered by Raif Berkay Dincel and confirmed on Linux Mint and Windows 10. |
| 10-Strike Bandwidth Monitor 3.9 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to bypass SafeSEH, ASLR, and DEP protections through carefully crafted input. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by sending a malicious payload to the application's registration key input, enabling remote code execution and launching arbitrary system commands. |
| Frigate Professional 3.36.0.9 contains a local buffer overflow vulnerability in the 'Find Computer' feature that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by overflowing the computer name input field. Attackers can craft a malicious payload that triggers a buffer overflow, enabling code execution and launching calculator as a proof of concept. |
| Code Blocks 17.12 contains a local buffer overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by crafting a malicious file name with Unicode characters. Attackers can trigger the vulnerability by pasting a specially crafted payload into the file name field during project creation, potentially executing system commands like calc.exe. |
| Infor Storefront B2B 1.0 contains a SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate database queries through the 'usr_name' parameter in login requests. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by injecting malicious SQL code into the 'usr_name' parameter to potentially extract or modify database information. |
| RaspAP raspap-webgui versions prior to 3.3.6 contain an OS command injection vulnerability. If exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by a user who can log in to the product. |
| Webile 1.0.1 contains a directory traversal vulnerability that allows remote attackers to manipulate file system paths without authentication. Attackers can exploit path manipulation to access sensitive system directories and potentially compromise the mobile device's local file system. |
| Stripe Green Downloads Wordpress Plugin 2.03 contains a persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability allowing remote attackers to inject malicious scripts in button label fields. Attackers can exploit input parameters to execute arbitrary scripts, potentially leading to session hijacking and application module manipulation. |
| Simple CMS 2.1 contains a remote SQL injection vulnerability that allows privileged attackers to inject unfiltered SQL commands in the users module. Attackers can exploit unvalidated input parameters in the admin.php file to compromise the database management system and web application. |
| Simple CMS 2.1 contains a persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability in user input parameters that allows remote attackers to inject malicious script code. Attackers can exploit the newUser and editUser modules to inject persistent scripts that execute on user list preview, potentially leading to session hijacking and application manipulation. |
| Ultimate POS 4.4 contains a persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability in the product name parameter that allows remote attackers to inject malicious scripts. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability through product add or edit functions to execute arbitrary JavaScript and potentially hijack user sessions. |
| Multiple payment terminal versions contain non-persistent cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in billing and payment information input fields. Attackers can inject malicious script code through vulnerable parameters to manipulate client-side requests and potentially execute session hijacking or phishing attacks. |
| Sistem Informasi Pengumuman Kelulusan Online 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to add unauthorized admin users through the tambahuser.php endpoint. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML form to submit admin credentials and create new administrative accounts without the victim's consent. |
| Code Blocks 20.03 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to crash the application by manipulating input in the FSymbols search field. Attackers can paste a large payload of 5000 repeated characters into the search field to trigger an application crash. |
| e-Learning PHP Script 0.1.0 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the search functionality that allows attackers to manipulate database queries through unvalidated user input. Attackers can inject malicious SQL code in the 'search' parameter to potentially extract, modify, or access sensitive database information. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: release path before initializing extent tree in btrfs_read_locked_inode()
In btrfs_read_locked_inode() we are calling btrfs_init_file_extent_tree()
while holding a path with a read locked leaf from a subvolume tree, and
btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() may do a GFP_KERNEL allocation, which can
trigger reclaim.
This can create a circular lock dependency which lockdep warns about with
the following splat:
[6.1433] ======================================================
[6.1574] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[6.1583] 6.18.0+ #4 Tainted: G U
[6.1591] ------------------------------------------------------
[6.1599] kswapd0/117 is trying to acquire lock:
[6.1606] ffff8d9b6333c5b8 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0
[6.1625]
but task is already holding lock:
[6.1633] ffffffffa4ab8ce0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x195/0xc60
[6.1646]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[6.1657]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[6.1667]
-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[6.1677] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x9d/0xd0
[6.1685] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x59/0x750
[6.1694] btrfs_init_file_extent_tree+0x90/0x100
[6.1702] btrfs_read_locked_inode+0xc3/0x6b0
[6.1710] btrfs_iget+0xbb/0xf0
[6.1716] btrfs_lookup_dentry+0x3c5/0x8e0
[6.1724] btrfs_lookup+0x12/0x30
[6.1731] lookup_open.isra.0+0x1aa/0x6a0
[6.1739] path_openat+0x5f7/0xc60
[6.1746] do_filp_open+0xd6/0x180
[6.1753] do_sys_openat2+0x8b/0xe0
[6.1760] __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0xa0
[6.1768] do_syscall_64+0x97/0x3e0
[6.1776] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[6.1784]
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
[6.1794] lock_release+0x127/0x2a0
[6.1801] up_read+0x1b/0x30
[6.1808] btrfs_search_slot+0x8e0/0xff0
[6.1817] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x52/0xd0
[6.1825] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x73/0x520
[6.1833] btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x11a/0x120
[6.1842] btrfs_log_inode+0x608/0x1aa0
[6.1849] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x249/0xf80
[6.1857] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x3e/0x60
[6.1865] btrfs_sync_file+0x431/0x690
[6.1872] do_fsync+0x39/0x80
[6.1879] __x64_sys_fsync+0x13/0x20
[6.1887] do_syscall_64+0x97/0x3e0
[6.1894] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[6.1903]
-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[6.1913] __lock_acquire+0x15e9/0x2820
[6.1920] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x2d0
[6.1927] __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x10a0
[6.1934] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0
[6.1944] btrfs_evict_inode+0x20b/0x4b0
[6.1952] evict+0x15a/0x2f0
[6.1958] prune_icache_sb+0x91/0xd0
[6.1966] super_cache_scan+0x150/0x1d0
[6.1974] do_shrink_slab+0x155/0x6f0
[6.1981] shrink_slab+0x48e/0x890
[6.1988] shrink_one+0x11a/0x1f0
[6.1995] shrink_node+0xbfd/0x1320
[6.1002] balance_pgdat+0x67f/0xc60
[6.1321] kswapd+0x1dc/0x3e0
[6.1643] kthread+0xff/0x240
[6.1965] ret_from_fork+0x223/0x280
[6.1287] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[6.1616]
other info that might help us debug this:
[6.1561] Chain exists of:
&delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-tree-00 --> fs_reclaim
[6.1503] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[6.1110] CPU0 CPU1
[6.1411] ---- ----
[6.1707] lock(fs_reclaim);
[6.1998] lock(btrfs-tree-00);
[6.1291] lock(fs_reclaim);
[6.1581] lock(&del
---truncated--- |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: marvell: prestera: fix NULL dereference on devlink_alloc() failure
devlink_alloc() may return NULL on allocation failure, but
prestera_devlink_alloc() unconditionally calls devlink_priv() on
the returned pointer.
This leads to a NULL pointer dereference if devlink allocation fails.
Add a check for a NULL devlink pointer and return NULL early to avoid
the crash. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/page_alloc: prevent pcp corruption with SMP=n
The kernel test robot has reported:
BUG: spinlock trylock failure on UP on CPU#0, kcompactd0/28
lock: 0xffff888807e35ef0, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kcompactd0/28, .owner_cpu: 0
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 28 Comm: kcompactd0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc5-00127-ga06157804399 #1 PREEMPT 8cc09ef94dcec767faa911515ce9e609c45db470
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:95)
dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130)
spin_dump (kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:71)
do_raw_spin_trylock (kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:?)
_raw_spin_trylock (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:89 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:138)
__free_frozen_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:2973)
___free_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:5295)
__free_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:5334)
tlb_remove_table_rcu (include/linux/mm.h:? include/linux/mm.h:3122 include/asm-generic/tlb.h:220 mm/mmu_gather.c:227 mm/mmu_gather.c:290)
? __cfi_tlb_remove_table_rcu (mm/mmu_gather.c:289)
? rcu_core (kernel/rcu/tree.c:?)
rcu_core (include/linux/rcupdate.h:341 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2607 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2861)
rcu_core_si (kernel/rcu/tree.c:2879)
handle_softirqs (arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 include/trace/events/irq.h:142 kernel/softirq.c:623)
__irq_exit_rcu (arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 kernel/softirq.c:725)
irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:741)
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1052)
</IRQ>
<TASK>
RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:95 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:152 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194)
free_pcppages_bulk (mm/page_alloc.c:1494)
drain_pages_zone (include/linux/spinlock.h:391 mm/page_alloc.c:2632)
__drain_all_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:2731)
drain_all_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:2747)
kcompactd (mm/compaction.c:3115)
kthread (kernel/kthread.c:465)
? __cfi_kcompactd (mm/compaction.c:3166)
? __cfi_kthread (kernel/kthread.c:412)
ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:164)
? __cfi_kthread (kernel/kthread.c:412)
ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:255)
</TASK>
Matthew has analyzed the report and identified that in drain_page_zone()
we are in a section protected by spin_lock(&pcp->lock) and then get an
interrupt that attempts spin_trylock() on the same lock. The code is
designed to work this way without disabling IRQs and occasionally fail the
trylock with a fallback. However, the SMP=n spinlock implementation
assumes spin_trylock() will always succeed, and thus it's normally a
no-op. Here the enabled lock debugging catches the problem, but otherwise
it could cause a corruption of the pcp structure.
The problem has been introduced by commit 574907741599 ("mm/page_alloc:
leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations"). The pcp locking scheme
recognizes the need for disabling IRQs to prevent nesting spin_trylock()
sections on SMP=n, but the need to prevent the nesting in spin_lock() has
not been recognized. Fix it by introducing local wrappers that change the
spin_lock() to spin_lock_iqsave() with SMP=n and use them in all places
that do spin_lock(&pcp->lock).
[vbabka@suse.cz: add pcp_ prefix to the spin_lock_irqsave wrappers, per Steven] |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: release path before iget_failed() in btrfs_read_locked_inode()
In btrfs_read_locked_inode() if we fail to lookup the inode, we jump to
the 'out' label with a path that has a read locked leaf and then we call
iget_failed(). This can result in a ABBA deadlock, since iget_failed()
triggers inode eviction and that causes the release of the delayed inode,
which must lock the delayed inode's mutex, and a task updating a delayed
inode starts by taking the node's mutex and then modifying the inode's
subvolume btree.
Syzbot reported the following lockdep splat for this:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
btrfs-cleaner/8725 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000d6826a48 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0xa0/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:290
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000dbeba878 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x44/0x2ec fs/btrfs/locking.c:145
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{4:4}:
__lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5574 [inline]
lock_release+0x198/0x39c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5889
up_read+0x24/0x3c kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1632
btrfs_tree_read_unlock+0xdc/0x298 fs/btrfs/locking.c:169
btrfs_tree_unlock_rw fs/btrfs/locking.h:218 [inline]
btrfs_search_slot+0xa6c/0x223c fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2133
btrfs_lookup_inode+0xd8/0x38c fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:395
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x124/0xed0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1032
btrfs_update_delayed_inode fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1118 [inline]
__btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x15f8/0x1748 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1141
__btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1ac/0x514 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1176
btrfs_run_delayed_items_nr+0x28/0x38 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1219
flush_space+0x26c/0xb68 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:828
do_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x110/0x364 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1158
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x90/0xd8 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1226
process_one_work+0x7e8/0x155c kernel/workqueue.c:3263
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3346 [inline]
worker_thread+0x958/0xed8 kernel/workqueue.c:3427
kthread+0x5fc/0x75c kernel/kthread.c:463
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:844
-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1774/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x14c/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
__mutex_lock_common+0x1d0/0x2678 kernel/locking/mutex.c:598
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:760 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38 kernel/locking/mutex.c:812
__btrfs_release_delayed_node+0xa0/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:290
btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:315 [inline]
btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x68/0x84 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1326
btrfs_evict_inode+0x578/0xe28 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5587
evict+0x414/0x928 fs/inode.c:810
iput_final fs/inode.c:1914 [inline]
iput+0x95c/0xad4 fs/inode.c:1966
iget_failed+0xec/0x134 fs/bad_inode.c:248
btrfs_read_locked_inode+0xe1c/0x1234 fs/btrfs/inode.c:4101
btrfs_iget+0x1b0/0x264 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5837
btrfs_run_defrag_inode fs/btrfs/defrag.c:237 [inline]
btrfs_run_defrag_inodes+0x520/0xdc4 fs/btrf
---truncated--- |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: ti: dma-crossbar: fix device leak on am335x route allocation
Make sure to drop the reference taken when looking up the crossbar
platform device during am335x route allocation. |
