| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Nextcloud Server is a self hosted personal cloud system. In Nextcloud Server prior to 31.0.10 and 32.0.1 and Nextcloud Enterprise Server prior to 28.0.14.11, 29.0.16.8, 30.0.17.3, and 31.0.10, contacts search allowed to retrieve personal data of other users (emails, names, identifiers) without proper access control. This allows an authenticated user to retrieve information about accounts that are not related or added as contacts. |
| Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Personal Project Panilux allows Cross Site Request Forgery.
This
CSRF vulnerability resulting in Command Injection has been identified.
This issue affects Panilux: before v.0.10.0. NOTE: The vendor was contacted and responded that they deny ownership of the mentioned product. |
| Vulnerability of improper criterion security check in the card module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability. |
| An Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard vulnerability [CWE-358] in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.0.1 through 7.0.22 may allow an unauthenticated proxy user to bypass the domain fronting protection feature via crafted HTTP requests. |
| HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.11), SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). The web interface of the affected devices are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. By tricking an authenticated victim user to click a malicious link, an attacker could perform arbitrary actions on the device on behalf of the victim user. |
| There is a CSRF in ZZZCMS zzzphp V1.6.1 via a /admin015/save.php?act=editfile request. It allows PHP code injection by providing a filename in the file parameter, and providing file content in the filetext parameter. |
| Some endpoints in vulnerability-lookup that modified
application state (e.g. changing database entries, user data,
configurations, or other privileged actions) may have been accessible
via HTTP GET requests without requiring a CSRF token. This flaw leaves
the application vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks:
an attacker who tricks a logged-in user into visiting a malicious
website could cause the user’s browser to issue GET requests that
perform unintended state-changing operations in the context of their
authenticated session.
Because the server would treat these GET requests as valid (since no
CSRF protection or POST method enforcement was in place), the attacker
could exploit this to escalate privileges, change settings, or carry out
other unauthorized actions without needing the user’s explicit consent
or awareness.
The fix ensures that all state-changing endpoints now require HTTP POST
requests and include a valid CSRF token. This enforces that state
changes cannot be triggered by arbitrary cross-site GET requests. This issue affects Vulnerability-Lookup: before 2.18.0. |
| The WP Landing Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'wplp_api_update_text' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary post meta via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The dream gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'dreampluginsmain' AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Image Optimizer by wps.sk plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the imagopby_ajax_optimize_gallery() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger bulk optimization via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Quantic Social Image Hover plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.8. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The ContentStudio plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.7. This is due to missing or insufficient nonce validation on the add_cstu_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The ARK Related Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 2.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ark_rp_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's configuration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The WC Vendors – WooCommerce Multivendor, WooCommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the /vendor_dashboard/product/delete/ endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete vendor products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Time Sheets plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several endpoints. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform a variety of actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Hide Categories Or Products On Shop Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_data_hcps() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Norby AI plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Torod – The smart shipping and delivery portal for e-shops and retailers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
