Total
1698 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-30914 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 4.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in XpeedStudio Metform allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Metform: from n/a through 3.9.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32964 | 1 Lobehub | 1 Lobe Chat | 2025-07-12 | 9 Critical |
| Lobe Chat is a chatbot framework that supports speech synthesis, multimodal, and extensible Function Call plugin system. Prior to 0.150.6, lobe-chat had an unauthorized Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the /api/proxy endpoint. An attacker can construct malicious requests to cause Server-Side Request Forgery without logging in, attack intranet services, and leak sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36458 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Symantec Privileged Access Management | 2025-07-12 | N/A |
| The vulnerability allows a malicious low-privileged PAM user to perform server upgrade related actions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1662 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 6.4 Medium |
| The URL Media Uploader plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0 via the 'url_media_uploader_url_upload' action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8099 | 2 Duckdb, Vanna-ai | 2 Duckdb, Vanna | 2025-07-12 | N/A |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna when using DuckDB as the database. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted SQL queries that leverage DuckDB's default features, such as `read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, and `read_blob`, to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, internal systems, and potentially further attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46531 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 4.9 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ankur Vishwakarma WP AVCL Automation Helper (formerly WPFlyLeads) allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects WP AVCL Automation Helper (formerly WPFlyLeads): from n/a through 3.4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56275 | 2 Envato, Wordpress | 2 Envato Elements, Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 4.1 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Envato Envato Elements allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Envato Elements: from n/a through 2.0.14. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13879 | 2 Wordpress, Xwp | 2 Wordpress, Stream | 2025-07-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Stream plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.2 due to insufficient validation on the webhook feature. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45317 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Sma1000 | 2025-07-12 | 7.5 High |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SMA1000 appliance firmware versions 12.4.3-02676 and earlier allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause the SMA1000 server-side application to make requests to an unintended IP address. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11836 | 1 Plextrac | 1 Plextrac | 2025-07-12 | N/A |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PlexTrac allowing requests to internal system resources.This issue affects PlexTrac: from 1.61.3 before 2.8.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30976 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 4.9 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in wpdive Nexa Blocks allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Nexa Blocks: from n/a through 1.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35172 | 2 Shortpixel, Wordpress | 2 Shortpixel Adaptive Images, Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 4.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ShortPixel ShortPixel Adaptive Images.This issue affects ShortPixel Adaptive Images: from n/a through 3.8.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13857 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| The WPGet API – Connect to any external REST API plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.10. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30453 | 2 Brave, Wordpress | 2 Brave Popup Builder, Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Brave Brave Popup Builder.This issue affects Brave Popup Builder: from n/a through 0.6.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0862 | 1 Proofpoint | 1 Enterprise Protection | 2025-07-12 | 5 Medium |
| The Proofpoint Encryption endpoint of Proofpoint Enterprise Protection contains a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to relay HTTP requests from the Protection server to otherwise private network addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37359 | 1 Hitachi | 1 Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server | 2025-07-12 | 8.6 High |
| The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. (CWE-918) Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, do not validate the Host header of incoming HTTP/HTTPS requests. By providing URLs to unexpected hosts or ports, attackers can make it appear that the server is sending the request, possibly bypassing access controls such as firewalls that prevent the attackers from accessing the URLs directly. The server can be used as a proxy to conduct port scanning of hosts in internal networks, use other URLs such as that can access documents on the system (using file://), or use other protocols such as gopher:// or tftp://, which may provide greater control over the contents of requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22603 | 1 Significant-gravitas | 1 Autogpt | 2025-07-12 | N/A |
| AutoGPT is a platform that allows users to create, deploy, and manage continuous artificial intelligence agents that automate complex workflows. Versions prior to autogpt-platform-beta-v0.4.2 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability inside component (or block) `Send Web Request`. The root cause is that IPV6 address is not restricted or filtered, which allows attackers to perform a server side request forgery to visit an IPV6 service. autogpt-platform-beta-v0.4.2 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24695 | 2 Hasthemes, Wordpress | 2 Extensions For Cf7, Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 4.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes Extensions For CF7 allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Extensions For CF7: from n/a through 3.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25301 | 1 Danielgatis | 1 Rembg | 2025-07-12 | N/A |
| Rembg is a tool to remove images background. In Rembg 2.0.57 and earlier, the /api/remove endpoint takes a URL query parameter that allows an image to be fetched, processed and returned. An attacker may be able to query this endpoint to view pictures hosted on the internal network of the rembg server. This issue may lead to Information Disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27152 | 1 Axios | 1 Axios | 2025-07-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js. The issue occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios. Even if baseURL is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios. This issue is fixed in 1.8.2. | ||||