Total
1543 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-8042 | 2 Google, Mozilla | 2 Android, Firefox | 2025-08-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Firefox for Android allowed a sandboxed iframe without the `allow-downloads` attribute to start downloads. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 141. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11176 | 2025-08-21 | N/A | ||
| Improper access control vulnerability in M-Files Aino in versions before 24.10 allowed an authenticated user to access object information via incorrect evaluation of effective permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54618 | 1 Huawei | 1 Harmonyos | 2025-08-20 | 5.7 Medium |
| Permission control vulnerability in the distributed clipboard module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1139 | 1 Ibm | 1 Edge Application Manager | 2025-08-20 | 6.1 Medium |
| IBM Edge Application Manager 4.5 could allow a local user to read or modify resources that they should not have authorization to access due to incorrect permission assignment. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6297 | 1 Debian | 1 Dpkg | 2025-08-19 | 8.2 High |
| It was discovered that dpkg-deb does not properly sanitize directory permissions when extracting a control member into a temporary directory, which is documented as being a safe operation even on untrusted data. This may result in leaving temporary files behind on cleanup. Given automated and repeated execution of dpkg-deb commands on adversarial .deb packages or with well compressible files, placed inside a directory with permissions not allowing removal by a non-root user, this can end up in a DoS scenario due to causing disk quota exhaustion or disk full conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36104 | 1 Ibm | 2 Spectrum Scale Container Native Storage Access, Storage Scale | 2025-08-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Storage Scale 5.2.3.0 and 5.2.3.1 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information from files due to the insecure permissions inherited through the SMB protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2025-45150 | 2 Langchain, Langchain-ai | 2 Langchain, Langchain | 2025-08-16 | 9.8 Critical |
| Insecure permissions in LangChain-ChatGLM-Webui commit ef829 allows attackers to arbitrarily view and download sensitive files via supplying a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5819 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-08-15 | 5 Medium |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.7 before 17.11.6, 18.0 before 18.0.4, and 18.1 before 18.1.2 that could have allowed authenticated users with developer access to obtain ID tokens for protected branches under certain circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7513 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Factorytalk View | 2025-08-15 | 8.8 High |
| CVE-2024-7513 IMPACT A code execution vulnerability exists in the affected product. The vulnerability occurs due to improper default file permissions allowing any user to edit or replace files, which are executed by account with elevated permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2759 | 2 Gstreamer, Gstreamer Project | 2 Gstreamer, Gstreamer | 2025-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| GStreamer Incorrect Permission Assignment Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of GStreamer. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the product installer. The issue results from incorrect permissions on folders. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of a target user. Was ZDI-CAN-25448. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45497 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Fuse, Openshift | 2025-08-13 | 7.6 High |
| A flaw was found in the OpenShift build process, where the docker-build container is configured with a hostPath volume mount that maps the node's /var/lib/kubelet/config.json file into the build pod. This file contains sensitive credentials necessary for pulling images from private repositories. The mount is not read-only, which allows the attacker to overwrite it. By modifying the config.json file, the attacker can cause a denial of service by preventing the node from pulling new images and potentially exfiltrating sensitive secrets. This flaw impacts the availability of services dependent on image pulls and exposes sensitive information to unauthorized parties. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45655 | 1 Ibm | 1 Application Gateway | 2025-08-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| IBM Application Gateway 19.12 through 24.09 could allow a local privileged user to perform unauthorized actions due to incorrect permissions assignment. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10256 | 1 Ivanti | 6 Endpoint Manager, Neurons Agent Platform, Neurons For Patch Management and 3 more | 2025-08-12 | 7.1 High |
| Insufficient permissions in Ivanti Patch SDK before version 9.7.703 allows a local authenticated attacker to delete arbitrary files. | ||||
| CVE-2019-4702 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium Data Encryption | 2025-08-12 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Security Guardium Data Encryption (GDE) 3.0.0.2 specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50675 | 2025-08-08 | 7.8 High | ||
| GPMAW 14, a bioinformatics software, has a critical vulnerability related to insecure file permissions in its installation directory. The directory is accessible with full read, write, and execute permissions for all users, allowing unprivileged users to manipulate files within the directory, including executable files like GPMAW3.exe, Fragment.exe, and the uninstaller GPsetup64_17028.exe. An attacker with user-level access can exploit this misconfiguration by replacing or modifying the uninstaller (GPsetup64_17028.exe) with a malicious version. While the application itself runs in the user's context, the uninstaller is typically executed with administrative privileges when an administrator attempts to uninstall the software. By exploiting this flaw, an attacker could gain administrative privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of the admin, resulting in privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7594 | 1 Hashicorp | 3 Vault, Vault Community Edition, Vault Enterprise | 2025-08-08 | 7.5 High |
| Vault’s SSH secrets engine did not require the valid_principals list to contain a value by default. If the valid_principals and default_user fields of the SSH secrets engine configuration are not set, an SSH certificate requested by an authorized user to Vault’s SSH secrets engine could be used to authenticate as any user on the host. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.17.6, and in Vault Enterprise 1.17.6, 1.16.10, and 1.15.15. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46093 | 1 Liquidfiles | 1 Liquidfiles | 2025-08-07 | 9.9 Critical |
| LiquidFiles before 4.1.2 supports FTP SITE CHMOD for mode 6777 (setuid and setgid), which allows FTPDrop users to execute arbitrary code as root by leveraging the Actionscript feature and the sudoers configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2012-10030 | 1 Freefloat | 1 Ftp Server | 2025-08-06 | N/A |
| FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbitrary files to sensitive system directories. The server accepts empty credentials, defaults user access to the root of the C:\ drive, and imposes no restrictions on file type or destination path. These conditions enable attackers to upload executable payloads and .mof files to locations such as system32 and wbem\mof, where Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) automatically processes and executes them. This results in remote code execution with SYSTEM-level privileges, without requiring user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45657 | 1 Ibm | 2 Security Verify Access, Verify Identity Access | 2025-08-05 | 5 Medium |
| IBM Security Verify Access Appliance and Container 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 could allow a local privileged user to perform unauthorized actions due to incorrect permissions assignment. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41659 | 1 Codesys | 1 Control | 2025-08-05 | 8.3 High |
| A low-privileged attacker can remotely access the PKI folder of the CODESYS Control runtime system and thus read and write certificates and its keys. This allows sensitive data to be extracted or to accept certificates as trusted. Although all services remain available, only unencrypted communication is possible if the certificates are deleted. | ||||