Export limit exceeded: 387559 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 387559 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 387559 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 387559 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 387559 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (387559 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-78216 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Lua | 2026-09-08 | N/A |
| AshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an eval action. A read call accepts an operation (list, min, max, first, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value. Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization. The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible. This issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84392 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy | 2026-09-08 | 2.5 Low |
| A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability [CWE-476] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.9.0, FortiPAM 1.8 all versions, FortiPAM 1.7 all versions, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to crash the httpsd daemon via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22575 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortimanager, Fortimanagercloud | 2026-09-08 | 4.7 Medium |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.10, FortiManager Cloud 7.2 all versions may allow an administrator to bypass the approval process for workflow sessions via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84391 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortianalyzer | 2026-09-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| A use of uninitialized variable vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.3 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to denial of service via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-84393 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2026-09-08 | 7.3 High |
| A improper validation of certificate with host mismatch vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.6.2 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-26084 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortisandbox, Fortisandboxcloud, Fortisandboxpaas | 2026-09-08 | 8.9 High |
| A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow attacker to access sensitive information via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84385 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortisoaron-premise, Fortisoarpaas | 2026-09-08 | 4.9 Medium |
| A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-78230 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Ai | 2026-09-08 | N/A |
| AshAi exposes Ash read actions to language-model tool calls. The read tool accepts an aggregate result type (min, max, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value. Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A tool caller could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate; min/max in particular return an actual field value. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The tool's existing check only required the field to be public, which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization. The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible. This issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84389 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisiem | 2026-09-08 | 2.8 Low |
| A url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, FortiSIEM 7.4.1 through 7.4.2 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-84387 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisandbox | 2026-09-08 | 6.7 Medium |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.2.0, FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.9 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-84386 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlientwindows | 2026-09-08 | 4.7 Medium |
| A unverified ownership vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiClientWindows 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to improper access control via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-78997 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| UC Browser for Android (package com.UCMobile.intl, version 13.7.8.1314) contains a Universal Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of any origin. An attacker hosts a specially crafted URL on a UC-owned domain (via a reflected XSS) that leverages the browser's internal JavaScript bridge to register a deferred callback, navigate the tab to a victim site, and then execute attacker-controlled code on that site when a login dialog is dismissed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82514 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86667 | 1 Aircheng-org | 1 Iwebshop-5 | 2026-09-08 | 4.7 Medium |
| A weakness has been identified in aircheng-org iWebShop-5 up to 5.15. The affected element is the function member_list of the file controllers/member.php. This manipulation of the argument Search causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64379 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-08 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: mask server-provided mode to 07777 in modefromsid When modefromsid is active, parse_dacl() applies the server-provided sub_auth[2] value from the NFS mode SID to cf_mode without masking to 07777. Apply the correct masking, same as in the read path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78837 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| A SQL injection vulnerability in the ap_form_{id} parameter in AppNitro MachForm v30 allows attackers to access sensitive database information via a crafted SQL statement. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79571 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect access control in the SellerAuthorizeAspect component of springboot-project v1.0.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to access all seller management interfaces and list all products/orders, put products on/off sale, finish/cancel orders, and modify categories without authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79577 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| An issue in the /cas/login component of sso-master v1.0.0 allows attackers to authenticate into the application without a password via sending a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79378 | 1 Bestechnic | 1 Bes2300 | 2026-09-08 | N/A |
| An issue in the btm_acl_handle() function of Bestechnic Co., Ltd BES2300 Bluetooth Audio SoC firmware v3.x and earlier allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via sending a crafted L2CAP packet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12650 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Neurons For Itsm | 2026-09-08 | 9.9 Critical |
| A Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Ivanti Neurons for ITSM before 2026.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server. | ||||