Export limit exceeded: 395620 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 395620 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (395620 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-76186 | 1 Apache | 2 Airflow Keycloak Provider, Apache-airflow-providers-keycloak | 2026-09-18 | 9.1 Critical |
| Apache Airflow Keycloak provider: from Airflow 3.3 the Keycloak auth manager takes a user's identity from the signed Airflow session token but takes the Keycloak access and refresh tokens used for every authorization decision from separate, unauthenticated cookies, and never checks that the two describe the same subject. A user who holds any valid Airflow login of their own, together with another subject's Keycloak access or refresh token obtained out of band, can pair the two: Airflow then authorizes requests with the foreign token's privileges while the session identity, audit log and cache keys continue to name the attacker's own account. The refresh path re-issues an Airflow session token for the original identity carrying the foreign tokens, so the mismatched pairing survives across sessions. Affects deployments running Airflow 3.3 or later with the Keycloak auth manager. Earlier versions carried the Keycloak tokens inside the signed session token, so the binding existed and was lost when they moved into separate cookies. Users of apache-airflow-providers-keycloak are recommended to upgrade to version 0.10.0 or later, which binds the cookie-supplied tokens to the session identity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75156 | 1 Apache | 2 Airflow Fab Provider, Apache-airflow-providers-fab | 2026-09-18 | 9.1 Critical |
| Apache Airflow FAB provider versions 3.7.3 through 3.8.0 do not validate the issuer or audience of Azure AD `id_token`s during OAuth login. Deployments are affected only when the FAB auth manager is configured with Azure AD as an OAuth provider. Because the signing keys are fetched from Microsoft's **multi-tenant** JWKS endpoint, an `id_token` minted in *any* Azure tenant — including one the attacker creates — passes signature verification, and the username and role assignments are then read from that attacker-controlled token. Anyone able to register an Azure tenant can therefore authenticate to the Airflow UI with no prior access to the deployment. The fix for **CVE-2026-59243** was incomplete, and this advisory closes the remaining gap: that fix made the provider verify the `id_token` signature, but did not add issuer or audience checks. Operators who already applied the CVE-2026-59243 fix are **still affected and must upgrade again** — 3.7.3 is the release that shipped that fix, so every version containing it falls inside this affected range. Upgrade to apache-airflow-providers-fab `3.8.1` or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86891 | 1 Apple | 2 Macos, Watchos | 2026-09-18 | 3.5 Low |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, watchOS 27. An app may be able to access Bluetooth device information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7406 | 1 Autodesk | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 9 more | 2026-09-18 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7405 | 1 Autodesk | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 9 more | 2026-09-18 | 5.5 Medium |
| A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service | ||||
| CVE-2026-93657 | 2026-09-18 | 7.5 High | ||
| hickory-resolver versions before 0.26.2 fail to propagate bogus DNSSEC proof states through the Resolver::lookup() and Resolver::lookup_ip() APIs, allowing invalid records to be returned as successful results. Attackers controlling the answering zone or positioned on the network path can have forged DNS records accepted as validated, bypassing DNSSEC authentication checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76000 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to exhaust system resources, resulting in an application denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76190 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 8.6 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75993 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 8.5 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious scripts into a web page, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75998 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 7.5 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive files and directories outside the intended access scope. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76002 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 6.1 Medium |
| ColdFusion is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If an attacker is able to convince a victim to visit a URL referencing a vulnerable page, malicious JavaScript content may be executed within the context of the victim's browser. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75746 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 9.1 Critical |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75990 | 1 Adobe | 3 Illustrator, Illustrator Desktop 2025, Illustrator Desktop 2026 | 2026-09-18 | 8.6 High |
| Illustrator is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75991 | 1 Adobe | 3 Illustrator, Illustrator Desktop 2025, Illustrator Desktop 2026 | 2026-09-18 | 8.6 High |
| Illustrator is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92027 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2026-09-18 | 8.8 High |
| Use-after-free in the DOM: Streams component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 115.41, Firefox ESR 140.16, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, Thunderbird 140.16, and Thunderbird 153.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92026 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2026-09-18 | 8.8 High |
| Use-after-free in the Networking component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 140.16, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, Thunderbird 140.16, and Thunderbird 153.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92025 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2026-09-18 | 8.8 High |
| Use-after-free in the DOM: Navigation component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 156, Firefox ESR 115.41, Firefox ESR 140.16, Firefox ESR 153.3, Thunderbird 156, Thunderbird 140.16, and Thunderbird 153.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91742 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-18 | 4.8 Medium |
| Confused deputy in PriceTracking in Google Chrome on on iOS prior to 153.0.8010.47 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions into a privileged page via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-91732 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-18 | 3.1 Low |
| Missing authorization in AppManifest in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-91723 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-18 | 4.2 Medium |
| Race condition in WebAppInstalls in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.47 allowed a remote attacker to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||