Export limit exceeded: 89915 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (89915 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-40983 | 1 Spring | 1 Micrometer | 2026-09-11 | 7.5 High |
| In Micrometer, it is possible for a user to provide specially crafted gRPC requests that may cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. Affected versions: Micrometer 1.16.0 through 1.16.5; 1.15.0 through 1.15.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35469 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubelet | 2026-09-11 | 6.5 Medium |
| spdystream is a Go library for multiplexing streams over SPDY connections. In versions 0.5.0 and below, the SPDY/3 frame parser does not validate attacker-controlled counts and lengths before allocating memory. Three allocation paths are affected: the SETTINGS frame entry count, the header count in parseHeaderValueBlock, and individual header field sizes — all read as 32-bit integers and used directly as allocation sizes with no bounds checking. Because SPDY header blocks are zlib-compressed, a small on-the-wire payload can decompress into large attacker-controlled values. A remote peer that can send SPDY frames to a service using spdystream can exhaust process memory and cause an out-of-memory crash with a single crafted control frame. This issue has been fixed in version 0.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-29181 | 1 Opentelemetry | 2 Opentelemetry, Opentelemetry-go | 2026-09-11 | 7.5 High |
| OpenTelemetry-Go is the Go implementation of OpenTelemetry. From 1.36.0 to 1.40.0, multi-value baggage: header extraction parses each header field-value independently and aggregates members across values. This allows an attacker to amplify cpu and allocations by sending many baggage: header lines, even when each individual value is within the 8192-byte per-value parse limit. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.41.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24708 | 1 Openstack | 2 Compute, Nova | 2026-09-11 | 8.2 High |
| An issue was discovered in OpenStack Nova before 30.2.2, 31 before 31.2.1, and 32 before 32.1.1. By writing a malicious QCOW header to a root or ephemeral disk and then triggering a resize, a user may convince Nova's Flat image backend to call qemu-img without a format restriction, resulting in an unsafe image resize operation that could destroy data on the host system. Only compute nodes using the Flat image backend (usually configured with use_cow_images=False) are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12151 | 2 Nodejs, Undici | 2 Undici, Undici | 2026-09-11 | 7.5 High |
| Impact: The undici WebSocket client enforces maxPayloadSize on the cumulative byte count of fragments in a message but does not enforce a limit on the number of fragments. A malicious WebSocket server can stream many small or empty continuation frames that each pass per-frame and cumulative-size validation, collectively causing unbounded memory growth in the client process. The result is memory exhaustion and a denial of service. Affected applications are those using the undici WebSocket client (new WebSocket(...)) or the WebSocketStream API that can be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised WebSocket endpoint. All releases starting at undici 6.17.0 are affected. Patches: Upgrade to undici >= 6.26.0, >= 7.28.0, or >= 8.5.0. Workarounds: No workaround is available. The fix must be applied through an upgrade. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61726 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Net/url, Go | 2026-09-11 | 7.5 High |
| The net/url package does not set a limit on the number of query parameters in a query. While the maximum size of query parameters in URLs is generally limited by the maximum request header size, the net/http.Request.ParseForm method can parse large URL-encoded forms. Parsing a large form containing many unique query parameters can cause excessive memory consumption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19872 | 1 Gshank | 1 Html::formhandler | 2026-09-11 | 6.1 Medium |
| HTML::FormHandler versions before 0.410000 for Perl allow cross-site scripting via a submitted value rendered unescaped in an error message. The wrappers and renderers that emit a form's errors interpolate the error string straight into HTML with no escaping. Two of the library's own messages, no_match and not_allowed, splice the submitted value into that string, and a failing type constraint puts the rejected value into the message it builds, which _apply_actions hands to add_error. A field declared with a check regexp, a check list or a type constraint reaches those messages, with no custom validator and no non-default configuration. Errors rendered through an application's own escaping template layer rather than the library's rendering roles are not affected. A request over the network that submits markup to such a field gets it back live inside the error span, running script in the victim's origin. Re-rendering a rejected value later gives the stored variant. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75056 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Intellij Idea | 2026-09-11 | 7.8 High |
| In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.2.1 rCE via Markdown export tool was possible | ||||
| CVE-2026-75644 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75637 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72626 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71356 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21090 | 2 Samsung, Samsung Mobile | 2 Android, Samsung Mobile Devices | 2026-09-11 | 7.8 High |
| Out-of-bounds write in libsaviextractor.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21091 | 2 Samsung, Samsung Mobile | 2 Android, Samsung Mobile Devices | 2026-09-11 | 7.8 High |
| Out-of-bounds write in libcodec2secevrcdec.so prior to SMR Sep-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14565 | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The advanced-customized-prompts WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not perform any capability, ownership, or nonce check before saving popup configuration to a product, nor escape the stored values on output, allowing any authenticated user such as a subscriber to store JavaScript that executes in the browser of visitors viewing the affected product. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27227 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75666 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75652 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75643 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75636 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||