Export limit exceeded: 24495 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24495 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-75885 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-08 | 9.3 Critical |
| A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-11788 | 1 Redhat | 12 389 Directory Server, Directory Server, Directory Server E4s and 9 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The dereference control plugin does not check for allocation failure before using a BER structure, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the LDAP server when the system is under memory pressure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11770 | 2 Port389, Redhat | 13 389-ds-base, 389 Directory Server, Directory Server and 10 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject LDAP search filters into the CleanAllRUV replication status-check extended operation. Because the handler performs the search against cn=config with elevated replication plugin privileges and returns a boolean match result, the attacker can extract sensitive server configuration metadata, including replication bind DNs and password storage scheme information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76560 | 1 Redhat | 10 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 7 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The SELFDN ACI bind-rule evaluator incorrectly matches an anonymous LDAP client's empty bind DN against an empty stored attribute value, allowing an unauthenticated client to satisfy access control checks intended to require a matching authenticated identity. This can allow an anonymous LDAP client to perform an operation, such as adding or modifying a directory entry, that a SELFDN-based ACI intended to restrict to a specific authenticated user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18922 | 1 Redhat | 11 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. During SASL PLAIN authentication, a stale identity carried in a Cyrus SASL auxiliary property from a prior failed bind attempt can be installed on a connection following a subsequent, unrelated successful bind, regardless of which SASL mechanism completes that second bind. An attacker can send a SASL PLAIN bind as cn=Directory Manager with an incorrect password, then complete a SASL ANONYMOUS bind on the same connection, causing the server to grant Directory Manager authority without any valid credentials. A variant using a valid low-privileged account's own successful bind instead of an anonymous one is also possible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19843 | 1 Redhat | 6 Directory Server, Directory Server E2s, Directory Server E4s and 3 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.4 High |
| A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The Cockpit 389 Console's LDAP editor constructs an ldapsearch command by embedding an LDAP entry's distinguished name (DN) into a shell command string without proper escaping. An LDAP user with delegated privileges to create or rename directory entries could craft a malicious DN containing shell metacharacters. When a Cockpit administrator subsequently views the entry in the 389 Console, the embedded shell command executes with root privileges on the directory server host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18453 | 1 Redhat | 11 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A missing NULL pointer check in the paged results handling of op_shared_search allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the LDAP server by sending a crafted sequence of search requests using the USE_ONE_BACKEND control, resulting in denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18355 | 1 Redhat | 10 Directory Server, Directory Server E4s, Enterprise Linux and 7 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). In sasl_io_start_packet(), the wrapped-record length read from the wire is validated only against an upper bound. A small wire length (0, 1, or 2) produces an encrypted_buffer_count below the already-consumed encrypted_buffer_offset, causing an unsigned subtraction underflow in sasl_io_read_packet(). PR_Recv is then requested to read approximately 4 GiB into a 1024-byte heap buffer, resulting in a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content. After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF > 0), a remote authenticated attacker can cause a denial of service or potentially achieve remote code execution. This flaw is distinct from CVE-2026-11774, whose fix only guards against upper-bound overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15722 | 1 Redhat | 12 389 Directory Server, Directory Server, Directory Server E4s and 9 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A stack buffer overflow flaw was found in 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). The get_ruvelement_from_berval() function in repl5_ruv.c copies digit characters from a network-supplied RUV berval into a fixed 16-byte stack buffer without bounds checking. A remote unauthenticated attacker can crash the LDAP server by sending a crafted StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest extended operation containing a replica ID field with more than 16 digit characters. The overflow occurs during payload decoding, before any authorization check. Stack protectors limit impact to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17635 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper configuration of HTTP method-based security constraints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17636 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 4 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of a specified quantity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17637 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 4 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow an adjacent-network attacker to execute arbitrary code due to deserialization of untrusted data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17643 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 4 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information and perform unauthorized actions due to insufficiently protected credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17644 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 4 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager (ftm) for Redhat Openshift, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information and modify transaction data due to the use of hard-coded credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17645 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12423 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 5 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. The Red Hat Satellite /unattended/provision API endpoint is vulnerable to an authentication bypass due to a semantic logic flaw in host_verifier.rb. The application verifies the database state of a provisioning token rather than its actual presence in the incoming HTTP request. Because a host actively undergoing provisioning has an unexpired token in the database, the server's valid_host_token? method evaluates to true, granting access to the kickstart template even if the requester provides no token at all in the URL. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12541 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 5 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. OS command injection vulnerabilities exist in the foreman-rake db:dump and db:import_dump tasks. The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input in the destination parameter (during backups) and the file parameter (during imports) before passing them to a Ruby system() call for execution. An attacker with permissions to execute foreman-rake (e.g., via a restricted sudo configuration) can append malicious shell commands to the provided file paths. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12540 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 5 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. A command injection vulnerability exists in the foreman-rake errors:fetch_log task. The request_id parameter is passed to an underlying system command (typically grep) without adequate shell neutralization. While the task is intended to fetch specific log entries, an attacker with sudo permissions to execute this rake task can inject shell metacharacters (such as ;, ", or |) to break out of the intended command and execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12544 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 5 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. The foreman-rake initialization logic in /usr/share/foreman/config/settings.rb contains a vulnerable code pattern where configuration data is processed through two distinct executable layers. This creates a multi-stage execution chain that allows for both Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) and insecure deserialization. This vulnerability can lead to remote code execution, total infrastructure compromise and supply chain risk. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17646 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Financial Transaction Manager, Financial Transaction Manager Ftmfor Redhat Openshift, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | 8.5 High |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper restriction of XML external entity references. | ||||