Export limit exceeded: 400454 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 400454 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (400454 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-102102 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 9.1 Critical |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves an issuer certificate in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102131 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 7.2 High |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway rejected certain configuration settings, but its validation did not recognize every form in which they could be supplied. An authenticated administrator could potentially use an unrecognized form to have a file of their choosing written to the gateway and executed, resulting in code execution as the gateway service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102130 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 7.2 High |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently validate the content of an uploaded backup, and allowed an administrator to influence how the application loaded it. An authenticated administrator could potentially use this to execute arbitrary code on the gateway as the underlying service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102128 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 7.5 High |
| An identity-verification weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed the gateway to act on the Kiteworks platform on behalf of a user it had not authenticated, and to provision a platform account for an identity it did not already know. A remote, unauthenticated sender could potentially exploit this to obtain control of a platform account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102127 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 7 High |
| An XML parser used by Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not restrict external entity references. Where an optional, non-default message-processing feature is enabled, a remote and unauthenticated sender could potentially use a crafted message to read files accessible to the gateway service account, including cryptographic key material and credentials, and have them sent to a destination they control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102103 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 9.1 Critical |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves a certificate revocation list in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102104 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 9.1 Critical |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway performs an online certificate status check for an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102119 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 7.2 High |
| A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outside the feature's designated directory. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102116 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 7.2 High |
| -A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the application to execute it, potentially resulting in remote code execution as the underlying service account. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54402 | 1 Idocv | 1 Idocview | 2026-10-01 | 7.5 High |
| iDocView contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in its /doc/upload endpoint that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to fetch arbitrary URLs by supplying a hardcoded default token value (testtoken) to bypass authentication. Attackers can exploit the unrestricted URL scheme handling, including file:// URIs, to read arbitrary local files such as operating-system and application configuration files, and to reach internal network hosts and services not otherwise accessible. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-03-26. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102108 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 7.2 High |
| An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the gateway service account. Exploitation requires an administrator account holding a specific queue-management privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102106 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 9.1 Critical |
| Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service. An administrative service in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not consistently enforce administrator authentication, so the required password check could be bypassed. An attacker who referenced a valid administrator account could potentially create, modify, or delete internal users and managed domains and change their security-feature configuration without authenticating; deleting a managed domain also removes its user accounts and could lock administrators out of the gateway. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102105 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway | 2026-10-01 | 9.1 Critical |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway renders message content that references external resources. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or trigger unintended actions on internal systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101276 | 1 Es | 1 Iperf3 | 2026-10-01 | N/A |
| iperf3 3.21 (esnet/iperf) contains a remote, unauthenticated heap use-after-free: the server's per-test watchdog server_timer_proc() frees streams without cancelling/joining their worker threads, so a blocked worker dereferences a freed iperf_stream; fixed in 3.22. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101283 | 1 Es | 1 Iperf3 | 2026-10-01 | N/A |
| iperf3 3.20–3.21 (esnet/iperf) has a pre-auth heap buffer overflow in decrypt_rsa_message(): a 256-byte RSA buffer is BIO_read with the attacker-controlled ciphertext length (guard warns only), so an unauthenticated client overflows the heap via an oversized authtoken; fixed in 3.22 | ||||
| CVE-2026-103540 | 2 Form Tools, Formtools | 2 Form Tools, Form Tools | 2026-10-01 | 6.3 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in formtools.org Form Tools up to 3.1.1. This vulnerability affects the function Clients::updateClientSettingsTab of the file global/code/Clients.class.php of the component Client Settings. The manipulation of the argument page_titles leads to improper neutralization of special elements used in a template engine. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103542 | 2 Form Tools, Formtools | 2 Form Tools, Form Tools | 2026-10-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in formtools.org Form Tools up to 3.1.1. Impacted is the function smart_fill of the file /global/code/actions.php of the component AJAX Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument url causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12627 | 2026-10-01 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Fortra's Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in boks_autoregisterd. A remote attacker with network access to the autoregistration service may be able to trigger memory corruption during client response processing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103113 | 1 Os4ed | 1 Opensis-classic | 2026-10-01 | 4.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in OS4ED openSIS-Classic up to 9.3. The affected element is the function save action of the file modules/students/Student.php of the component General Information Tab. Executing a manipulation of the argument students can lead to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100267 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-10-01 | 5.9 Medium |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19197 reDoS attack was possible via mailbox regex mail-rule filters | ||||