Export limit exceeded: 417539 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 417539 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 417539 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (417539 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-86400 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Authentication vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges. This is a critical severity vulnerability as it allows an attacker to take complete control of the system. Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86399 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-30 | 7.2 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86398 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to filesystem access for attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86397 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Authentication vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to privileged account creation. This is a critical severity vulnerability as it allows an attacker to take complete control of the system. Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86396 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86394 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect Data Domain | 2026-10-30 | 7.2 High |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85899 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge Chromium, Microsoft Edge (chromium-based) | 2026-10-30 | 8.1 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85897 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge Chromium, Microsoft Edge (chromium-based) | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85890 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge Chromium, Microsoft Edge (chromium-based) | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Double free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84296 | 2 Progress, Progress Software | 2 Ws Ftp Server, Ws Ftp Server | 2026-10-30 | 6.8 Medium |
| Multi-Factor Authentication Bypass vulnerability in SSH component in Progress Software WS_FTP Server versions prior to 2024.0.6, and 2025.0.3 on Windows allows authenticated users to bypass MFA requirements through improper association of authentication factors between accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84295 | 2 Progress, Progress Software | 2 Ws Ftp Server, Ws Ftp Server | 2026-10-30 | 10 Critical |
| Improper authentication in Progress Software WS_FTP Server versions prior to 2024.0.6 and 2025.0.3 on Windows could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive information, including administrative credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75525 | 1 Open-reception | 1 Appointment-booking-software | 2026-10-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. In versions 2.1.0 and prior, an unauthenticated attacker can store an arbitrary ML-KEM-768 public key under any existing user's identity in any tenant's staff-crypto recipient directory. The product's design guarantees that appointment data is end-to-end encrypted to staff members and that the staff recipient directory is not attacker-writable, so that even administrators and the operator cannot read patient data. This endpoint breaks that guarantee for an unauthenticated remote actor: it allows writing an arbitrary encryption recipient into the recipient directory of any tenant. The injected key receives the tunnel key of every appointment booked afterward in that tenant, because booking clients encrypt to all active staff keys. The attacker holds the corresponding secret key and is a persistent, unauthorized recipient of that key material. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches. | ||||
| CVE-2026-74755 | 1 Apache | 1 Brpc | 2026-10-30 | 7.5 High |
| An integer underflow in the mcpack2pb component of Apache bRPC (version < 1.18.0) on all platforms allows remote attackers to crash a bRPC server by sending a request containing a string field with a zero value_size. The UnparsedValue::as_string() function computes `_size - 1` without validating `_size`; when value_size is 0 the expression underflows to SIZE_MAX, resize() throws std::length_error, and because the exception is not caught on the request parsing path the process aborts (SIGABRT). Root Cause: In src/mcpack2pb/parser.cpp, UnparsedValue::as_string() resizes the output string to `_size - 1`, where `_size` is the value_size of a string field taken directly from the network data. A value_size of 0 underflows the unsigned size_t, and the subsequent resize() throws an exception that is not caught. Affected Scenarios: bRPC servers that accept nshead frames wired to the ubrpc mcpack2 adaptor (for example the NsheadService + UbrpcMcpack2Adaptor deployment pattern) can be crashed by a single unauthenticated request. Stock open-source bRPC registers the ubrpc/nshead_mcpack protocols as client-only, so default server configurations are not affected. How to Fix: 1. Upgrade bRPC to a version that includes this fix. 2. Apply the patch in PR https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/3450 | ||||
| CVE-2026-66392 | 1 Apache | 1 Brpc | 2026-10-30 | 5.9 Medium |
| Apache bRPC versions before 1.18.0 validate the server certificate chain when client TLS peer verification is enabled, but do not bind the certificate to an expected DNS name or IP address. A network attacker who can redirect or intercept a connection and who possesses a certificate issued by a CA trusted by the client for another name may impersonate the requested TLS endpoint. Affected Scenarios: Applications use a bRPC client Channel to connect to an untrusted network with certificate verification enabled and trust a CA that can issue certificates for identities other than the intended endpoint. How to Fix: Upgrade to Apache bRPC 1.18.0 and enable VERIFY_PEER with a positive verify_depth. HTTPS Channels automatically verify the certificate against the host in the Channel URL. Callers may set VerifyOptions::expected_peer_name explicitly when the certificate identity differs from the URL host. Alternatively, apply the patch from https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/3408 . Note: The new option performs DNS SAN or IP SAN verification during the TLS handshake. Configurations that set expected_peer_name while peer verification is disabled are rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65824 | 1 Open-reception | 1 Appointment-booking-software | 2026-10-30 | 7.4 High |
| OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 2.2.1, an attacker who captures a pending invite token can replay it to obtain a passkey-registration credential and register their own passkey on the invited account, taking control of that account. For a staff or tenant-admin invite this yields access to the tenant context tied to that account. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65566 | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Meow Apps AI Engine ai-engine allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects AI Engine: from n/a through 3.8.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62141 | 2026-10-30 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in WP ManageNinja LLC Fluent CRM fluent-crm allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Fluent CRM: from n/a through 3.2.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62055 | 2 Liquid Web / Stellarwp, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Event Tickets, Event Tickets | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Liquid Web / StellarWP Event Tickets event-tickets allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Event Tickets: from n/a through 5.30.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59562 | 1 Apache | 1 Iotdb | 2026-10-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| Missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in Apache IoTDB. This issue affects Apache IoTDB: from 2.0.0 before 2.0.11. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.11, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58663 | 1 Apache | 1 Iotdb | 2026-10-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in Apache IoTDB's Thrift RPC service This issue affects Apache IoTDB: from 2.0.0 before 2.0.11. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.11, which fixes the issue. | ||||