Export limit exceeded: 389560 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 389560 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (389560 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-73748 | 2026-09-01 | 2.2 Low | ||
| A vulnerability in the affected interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer allows an attacker with administrative privileges to access sensitive information in a cleartext format. A successful exploit allows an attacker to retrieve information which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by HPE Networking Fabric Composer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73747 | 2026-09-01 | 2.5 Low | ||
| A local privilege-escalation vulnerability has been discovered in HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user with local access to elevate their user privileges and make limited modifications on the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59850 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 4 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 1 more | 2026-09-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libssh. If data packets are processed after a channel is closed, channel data callbacks can be invoked after the associated data has already been freed, leading to crashes or possible use-after-free conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59848 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 4 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 1 more | 2026-09-01 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libssh. A malicious SFTP server can send responses for unknown request IDs that libssh clients keep queued indefinitely, causing unbounded memory growth and client-side denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59846 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 4 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 1 more | 2026-09-01 | 3.9 Low |
| A flaw was found in libssh. A malicious username expanded through %r in ProxyCommand handling can inject shell metacharacters, exposing environment variables and causing unintended shell behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59845 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 4 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 1 more | 2026-09-01 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libssh. When ProxyCommand is used, an unchecked fork() failure can be stored as process ID -1; during cleanup, signals may then be sent across the caller's accessible process tree, leading to local denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59844 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 4 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 1 more | 2026-09-01 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libssh. A remote authenticated client can issue SSH_FXP_READ requests with an arbitrarily large length, causing a libssh SFTP server to allocate excessive memory and potentially exhaust it through repeated requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59843 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 4 Libssh, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 1 more | 2026-09-01 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libssh. A remote authenticated peer can advertise a zero maximum packet size in SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN, causing later channel writes to loop indefinitely and consume CPU, leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71407 | 1 Nokogiri | 1 Nokogiri | 2026-09-01 | 8.1 High |
| This CVE ID has been rejected as a duplicate. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71406 | 1 Nokogiri | 1 Nokogiri | 2026-09-01 | 7.8 High |
| This CVE ID has been rejected as a duplicate. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71346 | 1 Sparklemotion | 1 Nokogiri | 2026-09-01 | 2.9 Low |
| This CVE ID has been rejected as a duplicate. | ||||
| CVE-2024-58378 | 2 Nokogiri, Sparklemotion | 2 Nokogiri, Nokogiri | 2026-09-01 | 7.5 High |
| This CVE ID has been rejected as a duplicate. | ||||
| CVE-2024-58377 | 1 Nokogiri | 1 Nokogiri | 2026-09-01 | 5.5 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected as a duplicate. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84288 | 1 Nousresearch | 1 Hermes-agent | 2026-09-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 0.18.2. This affects the function HermesACPAgent.prompt of the file acp_adapter/session.py of the component ACP Prompt Workflow. Such manipulation leads to denial of service. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-74835 | 1 Erlang | 3 Erlang/otp, Erlang\/otp, Otp | 2026-09-01 | 7.5 High |
| The inets application HTTP server httpd fails to enforce a configured body-size limit on chunked request. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71380 | 1 Erlang | 3 Erlang/otp, Erlang\/otp, Otp | 2026-09-01 | N/A |
| Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in Erlang/OTP inets httpd allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by sending valid request headers with a large Content-Length and then stalling before the body is complete. httpd_request_handler:handle_info/2 cancels the request timeout as soon as a parse step succeeds, which includes the headers, and the clause that handles a decoder asking for more data re-arms the socket with {active, once} without setting any further timer. httpd_request:whole_body/2 returns such a continuation whenever the bytes received are fewer than the announced Content-Length, so a well-formed request that stops mid-body leaves the worker waiting indefinitely. The periodic byte-rate check that would reclaim it is armed only when minimum_bytes_per_second is configured, which it is not by default. Repeating this across connections occupies every worker permitted by max_clients and denies service to legitimate clients at negligible bandwidth cost. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70405 | 1 Erlang | 3 Erlang/otp, Erlang\/otp, Otp | 2026-09-01 | N/A |
| Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Erlang/OTP snmp allows a remote attacker to degrade availability by sending an SNMP message containing a BER INTEGER whose length field is arbitrarily large. snmp_pdus:dec_integer_notag/1 defaults its size limit to infinity, and do_dec_integer_notag/2 then accumulates the value across every declared byte with a recursive shift and bitwise or. Work grows superlinearly in the declared length because each operation acts on a progressively larger bignum. The size-limited variant dec_integer_notag/2 exists but is reached from only one call site, dec_snmp_version/1, which bounds the version field to ten bytes; the request identifier, error status and index, generic and specific trap fields, engine boots and time, and every varbind value decoded by dec_value/1 all use the unbounded form. The decode runs before the PDU is processed, so no valid request is required beyond what the deployment demands to accept the message at all. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to snmp from 4.25.1 before 5.18.2.1, from 5.19 before 5.20.2.2, and from 5.20.3 before 5.20.5. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to snmp before 4.25.1, is affected is unknown. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82748 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash | 2026-09-01 | N/A |
| Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash authorizes an aggregate under one read action while computing it under another, so an aggregate can run with policies that do not match the action it was authorized against. Ash.Actions.Aggregate groups aggregates by their {authorize?, read_action} and authorizes each group under that read action, but when building the data query it selected the action as opts[:action] || read_action || <primary read> (lib/ash/actions/aggregate.ex). When a caller passed an :action option, the aggregate query ran under that action while authorization had been computed for the group's own read_action. If the run action's read policies are more permissive than the authorized one, the aggregate (a count or sum) is computed over records the authorized action's policies would have excluded, disclosing information about data the actor cannot read. The fix runs the aggregate under the same read_action it is authorized against. This issue affects ash: from 3.5.13 before 3.32.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82746 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash | 2026-09-01 | N/A |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an actor to update records forbidden by resource policies through the atomic path of Ash.update_many/4. Ash.update_many/4 runs as a single atomic statement (a data-layer update_many, for example a SQL MERGE) whenever an atomic strategy is used and the data layer supports it. Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany (lib/ash/actions/update/update_many.ex) took that path even under authorize?: true without applying the resource's policies, so the statement updated every row matched by primary key regardless of the policy filter that authorization would impose. An actor could therefore update records the policies forbid, such as rows belonging to another actor or tenant. The fix restricts the atomic path to data layers supporting changeset filters when authorizing, authorizes each changeset, and merges the resulting policy filter into each changeset so the statement only touches authorized rows. This issue affects ash: from 3.29.0 before 3.32.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82745 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash | 2026-09-01 | N/A |
| Improper Access Control vulnerability in ash-project ash lets a create action overwrite an existing record when the ETS or Mnesia data layer is used, because neither enforced primary-key uniqueness on insert. Unlike a SQL data layer, whose unique primary-key constraint rejects a duplicate, the ETS and Mnesia data layers implemented create as a keyed insert that replaces any existing entry with the same primary key (lib/ash/data_layer/ets/ets.ex, lib/ash/data_layer/mnesia/mnesia.ex). An actor who can set the primary key on a create (for example a user-supplied string or integer key) can submit a create whose key matches an existing record and silently overwrite it, destroying and replacing another entity's data without going through the update action or its policies. The fix rejects a create whose primary key already exists with an already-taken error, and only allows duplicates for keyless resources. This issue affects ash: from 0.4.0 before 3.32.2. | ||||