Export limit exceeded: 29843 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (29843 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-65630 | 1 Potatosalad | 1 Jose | 2026-10-26 | N/A |
| Observable Timing Discrepancy vulnerability in potatosalad jose allows recovery of a long-term X25519 private key through a timing side channel in the pure-Erlang Curve25519 fallback. The pure-Erlang X25519 implementation performs scalar multiplication over the secret private key using a recursive Montgomery ladder (jose_jwa_x25519:curve25519/2) whose clauses branch on individual bits of the clamped private scalar, and whose per-step operations (jose_jwa_x25519:montgomery_add/3 and jose_jwa_x25519:montgomery_double/1) and field inversion are built from value-dependent Erlang bignum arithmetic (multiplication, remainder, and modular exponentiation). Although the ladder is operation-count balanced and fixed at 254 steps, the concrete integer values processed at each step, and therefore the running time, depend on the secret scalar. The execution time of the public entry points jose_jwa_x25519:scalarmult/2, jose_jwa_x25519:x25519/2, jose_jwa_x25519:x25519_base/1, and jose_jwa_x25519:sk_to_pk/1 is thus a function of the private key. This path is reachable from the public API, most notably when a service decrypts attacker-supplied ECDH-ES (JWE) messages with a long-term X25519 key (for example through JOSE.JWK.box_decrypt_ecdh_es/2, which reaches jose_jwa_curve25519:x25519_shared_secret/2 and the ladder). An attacker who can submit ciphertexts and measure decryption timing can, in principle, recover the private key bit by bit, defeating the resistance X25519 was designed to provide. Recovery of the key compromises the confidentiality and authenticity of all data protected by it. This issue affects jose: from 1.10.0 before 1.11.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65626 | 1 Potatosalad | 1 Jose | 2026-10-26 | N/A |
| The pure-Erlang RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 decryption in the jose_jwa_pkcs1 module is a Bleichenbacher padding oracle. eme_pkcs1_decode/2 returns the recovered message when a decrypted block has valid PKCS#1 v1.5 padding (a leading 0x00 0x02, a padding string of at least eight non-zero bytes, and a 0x00 separator) and returns a distinct error result otherwise, and rsaes_pkcs1_decrypt/2 additionally returns {error, {badsize, _}} when the length check fails. The implementation applies no implicit-rejection countermeasure (RFC 8017 §7.2.2): it does not substitute a deterministic pseudo-random plaintext on a padding failure, so a one-bit padding-conformance signal leaks to the caller. Because the underlying modular exponentiation in dp/2 is a raw, non-blinded crypto:mod_pow/3, the padding check also stays distinguishable by timing even when an application normalizes every failure to a single error value. An unauthenticated attacker who knows only the public RSA key and can submit ciphertexts to a decryption endpoint that unwraps RSA1_5 JWE keys (or otherwise calls decrypt_private/3 with rsa_pkcs1_padding) can use this oracle to recover the plaintext of intercepted ciphertexts, such as content-encryption keys and thus the protected message, or to forge signatures, through roughly 10^4 to 10^6 adaptive chosen-ciphertext queries. This issue affects jose: from 1.3.0 before 1.11.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116478 | 1 A2aproject | 1 A2a-go | 2026-10-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in a2aproject a2a-go up to 2.4.0. This affects the function CreateExecutor of the file a2asrv/agentexec.go of the component Push Notification Handler. The manipulation results in information exposure through error message. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 2.5.0 mitigates this issue. The patch is identified as f4d588216b0c9520e94d571bab725c38ce23064c. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57447 | 1 Discourse | 1 Discourse-doc-categories | 2026-10-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| Discourse Doc Categories is a plugin for organizing Discourse topics as documentation. Prior to the verified source fix, the doc category index refresh resolves linked titles for private messages or restricted category topics without enforcing the viewer's authorization. A user who can edit the index topic can use this behavior to learn titles that the user is not authorized to view, although the advisory does not establish access to topic contents. This vulnerability is addressed by commit b15d4de02ad29d7c9525346afee51fef4a2c605a. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79853 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Sensitive information disclosure vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from the affected system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79871 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-26 | 9.6 Critical |
| A sensitive information disclosure vulnerability in the command line interface of AOS-10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive information. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to retrieve information which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by AOS-10. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89317 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Keypont-gose | 2026-10-26 | N/A |
| gose parsed the JWS `crit` header into `JwsHeader.Crit` and then never read it. RFC 7515 §4.1.11 requires a recipient to reject a JWS whose listed critical extension parameters it does not understand. gose implements no header extensions, so every token carrying a non-empty `crit` should have been rejected — and none were. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106676 | 2026-10-26 | N/A | ||
| qiujie mall-server 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT contains an integer overflow in CartServiceImpl that allows an authenticated user to wrap a cart quantity to a negative value. The order creation flow does not validate the resulting quantity and passes it to the stock update query, increasing inventory and creating negative-value orders. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115883 | 1 Langchain-ai | 3 Langgraph, Langgraph-checkpoint-postgres, Langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite | 2026-10-26 | N/A |
| LangGraph checkpoint savers provide Postgres- and SQLite-backed state persistence for LangGraph workflows and agents. Prior to langgraph-checkpoint-postgres 3.1.3 and langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite 3.1.2, PostgresStore, AsyncPostgresStore, SqliteStore, and AsyncSqliteStore flatten namespace labels with ".".join(namespace), while BaseStore validates labels only for put and aput. Unvalidated dotted labels passed through get, search, delete, list_namespaces, their asynchronous equivalents, or direct batch and abatch operations can resolve to another tenant's stored namespace, allowing cross-namespace reads, overwrites, or deletion. InMemoryStore is not affected because it compares namespace tuples. This issue is fixed in langgraph-checkpoint-postgres 3.1.3 and langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite 3.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115905 | 1 Zip-rs | 1 Zip2 | 2026-10-26 | N/A |
| zip is a zip library for Rust that supports reading and writing simple ZIP files. Through 9.0.4, ZipArchive treats Central Directory File Header filenames as authoritative while ZipStreamReader extracts using Local File Header filenames without reconciling the duplicate metadata in src/read/stream.rs. A crafted archive can therefore appear benign to a component that inspects the central directory but cause a streaming extractor to write a different attacker-selected path and content, potentially overwriting files used by a downstream service. This issue is fixed in version 9.0.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-113078 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-26 | 9.6 Critical |
| Improper input validation in Compositing in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-110938 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Eclipse Openj9 | 2026-10-26 | N/A |
| In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions up to 0.63.0, the JITServer component is vulnerable to denial of service due to improper boundary checks during protocol message and reply handling. An unauthenticated remote attacker or malicious JITServer can transmit malformed network payloads that cause out-of-bounds heap reads, immediately crashing the JITServer daemon or client JVM process via a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV). | ||||
| CVE-2026-116282 | 1 Kameleo | 1 Kameleo | 2026-10-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Kameleo up to 5.3.1. Affected by this issue is the function CookieController.ListCookies of the file client-engine-application/w.cs of the component Cookie Controller. The manipulation of the argument guid results in information disclosure. The attack can be executed remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109341 | 1 Surrealdb | 1 Surrealdb | 2026-10-26 | 7.1 High |
| SurrealDB before 3.3.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows callers with table-level write permission to read SELECT-restricted fields by resolving JSON Patch pointers against the unreduced record. Attackers can use PATCH copy or move operations to copy hidden fields into readable destinations, or abuse test mismatch errors as a disclosure oracle. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15044 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Ai | 2026-10-26 | 6.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the TrustyAI Service Operator. When deploying services like gorch or NemoGuardrails, if a specific security setting is not enabled, these services can expose their communication channels without requiring users to prove their identity. This allows any other program within the cluster to access the AI guardrails and orchestrator without proper authorization. An attacker could exploit this to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information and potentially make limited changes to the AI models. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110870 | 1 Nodemailer | 1 Nodemailer | 2026-10-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105895 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager | 2026-10-26 | 9.9 Critical |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82943 | 2026-10-26 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains vulnerabilities where a malicious device can send messages that cause the master to read data from memory locations beyond the intended buffer. The software uses length values from device responses without validating them against actual buffer sizes. An attacker can exploit this to extract up to 64KB of data from the master's memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106626 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Cloud Service | 2026-10-26 | 9.1 Critical |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116284 | 1 Kameleo | 1 Kameleo | 2026-10-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in Kameleo up to 5.3.1. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /general/user-info of the component Local API. Such manipulation leads to information disclosure. The attack may be performed from remote. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||