Export limit exceeded: 15676 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (15676 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-32882 | 1 Wagtail | 1 Wagtail | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low |
| Wagtail is an open source content management system built on Django. In affected versions if a model has been made available for editing through the `wagtail.contrib.settings` module or `ModelViewSet`, and the `permission` argument on `FieldPanel` has been used to further restrict access to one or more fields of the model, a user with edit permission over the model but not the specific field can craft an HTTP POST request that bypasses the permission check on the individual field, allowing them to update its value. This vulnerability is not exploitable by an ordinary site visitor without access to the Wagtail admin, or by a user who has not been granted edit access to the model in question. The editing interfaces for pages and snippets are also unaffected. Patched versions have been released as Wagtail 6.0.3 and 6.1. Wagtail releases prior to 6.0 are unaffected. Users are advised to upgrade. Site owners who are unable to upgrade to a patched version can avoid the vulnerability as follows: 1.For models registered through `ModelViewSet`, register the model as a snippet instead; 2. For settings models, place the restricted fields in a separate settings model, and configure permission at the model level. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7350 | 1 Reputeinfosystems | 1 Appointment Booking Calendar Plugin And Scheduling Plugin Bookingpress | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Appointment Booking Calendar Plugin and Online Scheduling Plugin – BookingPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in versions 1.1.6 to 1.1.7. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying a user's identity prior to logging them in when completing a booking. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as registered users, including administrators, if they have access to that user's email. This is only exploitable when the 'Auto login user after successful booking' setting is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43027 | 1 Genetec | 1 Security Center | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| A critical severity vulnerability has been identified in the ALPR Manager role of Security Center that could allow attackers to gain administrative access to the Genetec Security Center system. The Genetec engineering team discovered this issue internally. There is currently no evidence that this vulnerability has been exploited in the wild. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56973 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Insecure Permissions vulnerability in Alvaria, Inc Unified IP Unified Director before v.7.2SP2 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the source and filename parameters to the ProcessUploadFromURL.jsp component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42194 | 2026-04-15 | 3.1 Low | ||
| An improper handling of insufficient permissions or privileges affects HCL BigFix Inventory. An attacker having access via a read-only account can possibly change certain configuration parameters by crafting a specific REST API call. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33862 | 1 Eaton | 1 Intelligent Power Protector | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| IPP software prior to v1.71 is vulnerable to default credential vulnerability. This could lead attackers to identify and access vulnerable systems. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32044 | 1 Intel | 1 Arc Pro Graphics | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| Improper access control for some Intel(R) Arc(TM) Pro Graphics for Windows drivers before version 31.0.101.5319 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20315 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xr Software | 2026-04-15 | 5.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the access control list (ACL) processing on MPLS interfaces in the ingress direction of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured ACL. This vulnerability is due to improper assignment of lookup keys to internal interface contexts. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by attempting to send traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access resources behind the affected device that were supposed to be protected by a configured ACL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38523 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Hush Line is a free and open-source, anonymous-tip-line-as-a-service for organizations or individuals. The TOTP authentication flow has multiple issues that weakens its one-time nature. Specifically, the lack of 2FA for changing security settings allows attacker with CSRF or XSS primitives to change such settings without user interaction and credentials are required. This vulnerability has been patched in version 0.10. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9151 | 1 Thrivex | 1 Blog | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in LiuYuYang01 ThriveX-Blog up to 3.1.7. Affected by this vulnerability is the function updateJsonValueByName of the file /web_config/json/name/web. Performing manipulation results in improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61928 | 1 Better-auth | 1 Better Auth | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. In versions prior to 1.3.26, unauthenticated attackers can create or modify API keys for any user by passing that user's id in the request body to the `api/auth/api-key/create` route. `session?.user ?? (authRequired ? null : { id: ctx.body.userId })`. When no session exists but `userId` is present in the request body, `authRequired` becomes false and the user object is set to the attacker-controlled ID. Server-only field validation only executes when `authRequired` is true (lines 280-295), allowing attackers to set privileged fields. No additional authentication occurs before the database operation, so the malicious payload is accepted. The same pattern exists in the update endpoint. This is a critical authentication bypass enabling full an unauthenticated attacker can generate an API key for any user and immediately gain complete authenticated access. This allows the attacker to perform any action as the victim user using the api key, potentially compromise the user data and the application depending on the victim's privileges. Version 1.3.26 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2230 | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High | ||
| A flaw exists in the Windows login flow where an AuthContext token can be exploited for replay attacks and authentication bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42048 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| OpenOrange Business Framework version 1.15.5 installs to a directory with overly permissive access control, allowing all authenticated users to write to the installation path. In combination with the application's behavior of loading DLLs from this location, this allows for DLL hijacking and may result in arbitrary code execution and privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1767 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubelet | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| This CVE only affects Kubernetes clusters that utilize the in-tree gitRepo volume to clone git repositories from other pods within the same node. Since the in-tree gitRepo volume feature has been deprecated and will not receive security updates upstream, any cluster still using this feature remains vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14089 | 1 Himool | 1 Erp | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in Himool ERP up to 2.2. Affected by this issue is the function update_account of the file /api/admin/update_account/ of the component AdminActionViewSet. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29946 | 1 Nats | 1 Nats Server | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| NATS.io NATS Server before 2.8.2 and Streaming Server before 0.24.6 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by the failure to enforce negative user permissions in one scenario. By using a queue subscription on the wildcard, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to allow denied subjects. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11015 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Sign In With Google plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.0. This is due to the 'authenticate_user' user function not implementing sufficient null value checks when setting the access token and user information. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as the first user who has signed in using Google OAuth, which could be the site administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20099 | 1 Intel | 1 Rapid Storage Technology | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| Improper access control for some Intel(R) Rapid Storage Technology installation software may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48853 | 1 Abb | 3 Aspect Enterprise, Matrix Series, Nexus Series | 2026-04-15 | 9 Critical |
| An escalation of privilege vulnerability in ASPECT could provide an attacker root access to a server when logged in as a "non" root ASPECT user. This issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.08.03; NEXUS Series: through 3.08.03; MATRIX Series: through 3.08.03. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6697 | 1 Hitachi | 1 Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| The product does not handle or incorrectly handles when it has insufficient privileges to access resources or functionality as specified by their permissions. This may cause it to follow unexpected code paths that may leave the product in an invalid state. (CWE-280) Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, do not handle invalid and missing permissions correctly, resulting in a denial of service. An adversary leverages a legitimate capability of an application in such a way as to achieve a negative technical impact. | ||||