Export limit exceeded: 110641 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (110641 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-61772 | 1 Rack | 1 Rack | 2025-10-10 | 7.5 High |
| Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. In versions prior to 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2, `Rack::Multipart::Parser` can accumulate unbounded data when a multipart part’s header block never terminates with the required blank line (`CRLFCRLF`). The parser keeps appending incoming bytes to memory without a size cap, allowing a remote attacker to exhaust memory and cause a denial of service (DoS). Attackers can send incomplete multipart headers to trigger high memory use, leading to process termination (OOM) or severe slowdown. The effect scales with request size limits and concurrency. All applications handling multipart uploads may be affected. Versions 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2 cap per-part header size (e.g., 64 KiB). As a workaround, restrict maximum request sizes at the proxy or web server layer (e.g., Nginx `client_max_body_size`). | ||||
| CVE-2025-61771 | 1 Rack | 1 Rack | 2025-10-10 | 7.5 High |
| Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. In versions prior to 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2, ``Rack::Multipart::Parser` stores non-file form fields (parts without a `filename`) entirely in memory as Ruby `String` objects. A single large text field in a multipart/form-data request (hundreds of megabytes or more) can consume equivalent process memory, potentially leading to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions and denial of service (DoS). Attackers can send large non-file fields to trigger excessive memory usage. Impact scales with request size and concurrency, potentially leading to worker crashes or severe garbage-collection overhead. All Rack applications processing multipart form submissions are affected. Versions 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2 enforce a reasonable size cap for non-file fields (e.g., 2 MiB). Workarounds include restricting maximum request body size at the web-server or proxy layer (e.g., Nginx `client_max_body_size`) and validating and rejecting unusually large form fields at the application level. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61770 | 1 Rack | 1 Rack | 2025-10-10 | 7.5 High |
| Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. In versions prior to 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2, `Rack::Multipart::Parser` buffers the entire multipart preamble (bytes before the first boundary) in memory without any size limit. A client can send a large preamble followed by a valid boundary, causing significant memory use and potential process termination due to out-of-memory (OOM) conditions. Remote attackers can trigger large transient memory spikes by including a long preamble in multipart/form-data requests. The impact scales with allowed request sizes and concurrency, potentially causing worker crashes or severe slowdown due to garbage collection. Versions 2.2.19, 3.1.17, and 3.2.2 enforce a preamble size limit (e.g., 16 KiB) or discard preamble data entirely. Workarounds include limiting total request body size at the proxy or web server level and monitoring memory and set per-process limits to prevent OOM conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59830 | 1 Rack | 1 Rack | 2025-10-10 | 7.5 High |
| Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to version 2.2.18, Rack::QueryParser enforces its params_limit only for parameters separated by &, while still splitting on both & and ;. As a result, attackers could use ; separators to bypass the parameter count limit and submit more parameters than intended. Applications or middleware that directly invoke Rack::QueryParser with its default configuration (no explicit delimiter) could be exposed to increased CPU and memory consumption. This can be abused as a limited denial-of-service vector. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.18. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0739 | 1 Thesamur | 1 Embedai | 2025-10-10 | 8.6 High |
| An Improper Access Control vulnerability has been found in EmbedAI 2.1 and below. This vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to show subscription's information of others users by changing the "SUSCBRIPTION_ID" param of the endpoint "/demos/embedai/subscriptions/show/<SUSCBRIPTION_ID>". | ||||
| CVE-2025-0740 | 1 Thesamur | 1 Embedai | 2025-10-10 | 8.6 High |
| An Improper Access Control vulnerability has been found in EmbedAI 2.1 and below. This vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to obtain chat messages belonging to other users by changing the “CHAT_ID” of the endpoint "/embedai/chats/load_messages?chat_id=<CHAT_ID>". | ||||
| CVE-2024-37829 | 1 Getoutline | 1 Outline | 2025-10-10 | 8.8 High |
| An issue in Outline <= v0.76.1 allows attackers to execute a session hijacking attack via user interaction with a crafted magic sign-in link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2861 | 1 Arteche | 2 Satech Bcu, Satech Bcu Firmware | 2025-10-10 | 7.5 High |
| SaTECH BCU in its firmware version 2.1.3 uses the HTTP protocol. The use of the HTTP protocol for web browsing has the problem that information is exchanged in unencrypted text. Since sensitive data such as credentials are exchanged, an attacker could obtain them and log in legitimately. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2863 | 1 Arteche | 2 Satech Bcu, Satech Bcu Firmware | 2025-10-10 | 7.8 High |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web application of saTECH BCU firmware version 2.1.3, which could allow an unauthenticated local attacker to exploit active administrator sessions and perform malicious actions. The malicious actions that can be executed by the attacker depend on the logged-in user, and may include rebooting the device or modifying roles and permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60959 | 2 Endrun, Endruntechnologies | 3 Sonoma D12 Network Time Server, Sonoma D12, Sonoma D12 Firmware | 2025-10-10 | 8.2 High |
| OS Command Injection vulnerability in EndRun Technologies Sonoma D12 Network Time Server (GPS) F/W 6010-0071-000 Ver 4.00 allows attackers to gain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60956 | 2 Endrun, Endruntechnologies | 3 Sonoma D12 Network Time Server, Sonoma D12, Sonoma D12 Firmware | 2025-10-10 | 8 High |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EndRun Technologies Sonoma D12 Network Time Server (GPS) F/W 6010-0071-000 Ver 4.00 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial of service, gain escalated privileges, and gain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31952 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Dryice Iautomate | 2025-10-10 | 7.1 High |
| HCL iAutomate is affected by an insufficient session expiration. This allows tokens to remain valid indefinitely unless manually revoked, increasing the risk of unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60958 | 2 Endrun, Endruntechnologies | 3 Sonoma D12 Network Time Server, Sonoma D12, Sonoma D12 Firmware | 2025-10-10 | 7.3 High |
| Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in EndRun Technologies Sonoma D12 Network Time Server (GPS) F/W 6010-0071-000 Ver 4.00 allows attackers to gain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60960 | 2 Endrun, Endruntechnologies | 3 Sonoma D12 Network Time Server, Sonoma D12, Sonoma D12 Firmware | 2025-10-10 | 8.2 High |
| OS Command Injection vulnerability in EndRun Technologies Sonoma D12 Network Time Server (GPS) F/W 6010-0071-000 Ver 4.00 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial of service, gain escalated privileges, and gain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31953 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Dryice Iautomate | 2025-10-10 | 7.1 High |
| HCL iAutomate includes hardcoded credentials which may result in potential exposure of confidential data if intercepted or accessed by unauthorized parties. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60962 | 2 Endrun, Endruntechnologies | 3 Sonoma D12 Network Time Server, Sonoma D12, Sonoma D12 Firmware | 2025-10-10 | 8.2 High |
| OS Command Injection vulnerability in EndRun Technologies Sonoma D12 Network Time Server (GPS) F/W 6010-0071-000 Ver 4.00 allows attackers to gain sensitive information, and possibly other unspecified impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60963 | 2 Endrun, Endruntechnologies | 3 Sonoma D12 Network Time Server, Sonoma D12, Sonoma D12 Firmware | 2025-10-10 | 8.2 High |
| OS Command Injection vulnerability in EndRun Technologies Sonoma D12 Network Time Server (GPS) F/W 6010-0071-000 Ver 4.00 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code, cause a denial of service, gain escalated privileges, and gain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31955 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Dryice Iautomate | 2025-10-10 | 7.6 High |
| HCL iAutomate is affected by a sensitive data exposure vulnerability. This issue may allow unauthorized access to sensitive information within the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59943 | 2 Phpmyfaq, Thorsten | 2 Phpmyfaq, Phpmyfaq | 2025-10-10 | 8.1 High |
| phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. Versions 4.0-nightly-2025-10-03 and below do not enforce uniqueness of email addresses during user registration. This allows multiple distinct accounts to be created with the same email. Because email is often used as an identifier for password resets, notifications, and administrative actions, this flaw can cause account ambiguity and, in certain configurations, may lead to privilege escalation or account takeover. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.13. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60787 | 1 Motioneye Project | 1 Motioneye | 2025-10-10 | 7.2 High |
| MotionEye v0.43.1b4 and before is vulnerable to OS Command Injection in configuration parameters such as image_file_name. Unsanitized user input is written to Motion configuration files, allowing remote authenticated attackers with admin access to achieve code execution when Motion is restarted. | ||||