Export limit exceeded: 93957 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (93957 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-30095 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-07-20 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2026-15091 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Ai Hub | 2026-07-20 | 9.3 Critical |
| IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary scripts due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16252 | 1 Beijing Shenzhou Shihan Technology | 1 Multimedia Integrated Business Display System | 2026-07-20 | 7.3 High |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Beijing Shenzhou Shihan Technology Multimedia Integrated Business Display System 8.2.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /admin/system/structure/updateStructure/deflate/Insecure/Staffshinel Ds.jsp?Shine ID=aaa. The manipulation of the argument Structure_ID results in sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50148 | 1 Metabase | 1 Metabase | 2026-07-20 | 10 Critical |
| Metabase is an open-source business intelligence and embedded analytics tool. From 1.54.0 until 1.54.24, 1.55.24, 1.56.25, 1.57.19, 1.58.14, 1.59.10, and 1.60.4, a Metabase user with permission to add or edit a database connection can achieve remote code execution on the Metabase server by configuring a Snowflake connection to an attacker-controlled server, because a flaw in the Snowflake JDBC driver can write arbitrary files anywhere on the Metabase host, including replacing one of Metabase's own database driver files that later executes inside the Metabase process. This issue is fixed in versions 1.54.24, 1.55.24, 1.56.25, 1.57.19, 1.58.14, 1.59.10, and 1.60.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62685 | 1 Filebrowser | 1 Filebrowser | 2026-07-20 | 8.1 High |
| File Browser is a file managing interface for uploading, deleting, previewing, renaming, and editing files within a specified directory. Prior to 2.63.17, File Browser builds new user scopes from usernames passed through cleanUsername() when Signup=true and CreateUserDir=true, but the many-to-one normalization can collapse usernames such as team/one, team one, and team-one to the same home directory without checking whether the resulting scope is already taken, allowing a second registrant to gain full read and write access to another user's files. This issue is fixed in version 2.63.17. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59238 | 1 Maalfer | 1 Pentestify | 2026-07-20 | N/A |
| Stored Cross-site Scripting (CWE-79) in the client-side report rendering functions (renderPreview, renderEditor, renderAuditData in js/app.js) in maalfer Pentestify before 1.1.0 allows a remote, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of any user who views an affected report via a payload stored in a finding's images array or a report's client_logo array, which is interpolated into an <img> src attribute without escaping. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16218 | 1 Hunvreus | 1 Devpush | 2026-07-20 | 2.6 Low |
| A vulnerability was detected in hunvreus devpush up to 0.4.6. Affected by this issue is the function reset_storage of the file app/workers/tasks/storage.py of the component Storage Reset Failure Handler. The manipulation results in improper check or handling of exceptional conditions. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16225 | 1 Davenardella | 1 Snap7 | 2026-07-20 | 6.3 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in davenardella snap7 up to 1.4.3. The impacted element is the function TSnap7Peer::NegotiatePDULength of the file src/core/s7_peer.cpp. The manipulation of the argument PDULength results in out-of-bounds write. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15069 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Ai Hub | 2026-07-20 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Engineering AI Hub 1.0.0, 1.1.0, and 1.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary script code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14448 | 2 Helmholz, Mb Connect Line | 5 Myrex24v2, Myrex24v2.virtual, Myrex24v2virtual and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 7.2 High |
| An high privileged remote attacker can exploit an authenticated OS command injection vulnerability in the system_certificates view due to improper neutralization of special elements in an OS command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality, availability and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16203 | 1 Sourcecodester | 1 Class And Exam Timetabling System | 2026-07-20 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability was identified in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /forCYS.php. Such manipulation of the argument course leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16095 | 1 Shibby | 1 Tomato | 2026-07-20 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw has been found in Shibby Tomato 1.28 RT-N5x MIPSR2 Build 124. Affected by this issue is the function setup_conntrack of the file /sbin/rc. Executing a manipulation of the argument ct_tcp_timeout can lead to out-of-bounds write. The attack may be performed from remote. This project is superseded by FreshTomato. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63799 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-20 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/mmcid: Fix OOB clear_bit when CID is MM_CID_UNSET in fixup path In mm_cid_fixup_cpus_to_tasks(), when rq->curr has the target mm and mm_cid.active is set, the CID is checked with cid_in_transit() before setting the transition bit. In per-CPU mode a newly forked or exec'd task can be running with mm_cid.cid == MM_CID_UNSET because CIDs are assigned lazily on schedule-in. With cid_in_transit() the guard passes for MM_CID_UNSET (no transit bit), converts it to MM_CID_UNSET | MM_CID_TRANSIT and stores it back; later mm_cid_schedout() feeds this to clear_bit() with MM_CID_UNSET as the bit number, triggering an out-of-bounds write. Symptoms: this is genuine memory corruption, but a bounded out-of-bounds write, not an arbitrary one. MM_CID_UNSET is the fixed sentinel BIT(31), so once the bad value reaches mm_cid_schedout() the cid_from_transit_cid() strip leaves MM_CID_UNSET, which fails the "cid < max_cids" convergence test and falls into mm_drop_cid() -> clear_bit(MM_CID_UNSET, mm_cidmask(mm)). The cid bitmap is embedded in the mm_struct slab object (after cpu_bitmap and mm_cpus_allowed) and is only num_possible_cpus() bits wide, so clearing bit 31 is a deterministic OOB bit-clear at a fixed offset of 2^31 / 8 == 256 MiB past the bitmap base. The address is not attacker-influenced (fixed sentinel -> fixed offset) and the op only clears a single bit; what sits 256 MiB further along the direct map is whatever kernel object happens to live there, so this corrupts one bit of unpredictable kernel memory -- it is not an arbitrary-address or arbitrary-value write. It triggers only in per-CPU CID mode, when a CPU is running an active task of the target mm whose cid is still MM_CID_UNSET -- the fork()/execve() window before that task's next schedule-in assigns it a real CID -- and a per-CPU -> per-task fixup walks over it (the mode fallback driven by a thread exit, sched_mm_cid_exit(), or by the deferred max_cids recompute in mm_cid_work_fn()). In practice syzkaller surfaced it as a KASAN use-after-free reported in __schedule -> mm_cid_switch_to, where the offending clear_bit() is inlined via mm_cid_schedout() -> mm_drop_cid(). Guard the transition-bit assignment against MM_CID_UNSET, in addition to the existing cid_in_transit() check, so the bit is only set on a genuine task-owned CID. A CPU-owned (MM_CID_ONCPU) CID of a running active task is handled by the cid_on_cpu(pcp->cid) branch above and never reaches this path, so excluding MM_CID_UNSET (and the already-transitioning case) is sufficient. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53397 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-20 | 7.5 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix posix_acl leak on SETACL decode failure nfsaclsvc_decode_setaclargs() and nfs3svc_decode_setaclargs() each call nfs_stream_decode_acl() twice, first for NFS_ACL and then for NFS_DFACL. Each successful call transfers ownership of a freshly allocated posix_acl into argp->acl_access or argp->acl_default. If the first call succeeds but the second fails, the decoder returns false and argp->acl_access is left dangling. ACLPROC2_SETACL.pc_release was wired to nfssvc_release_attrstat and ACLPROC3_SETACL.pc_release was wired to nfs3svc_release_fhandle. Both only call fh_put() and have no knowledge of the ACL fields on argp. The posix_acl_release() pairs sat at the out: labels inside nfsacld_proc_setacl() and nfsd3_proc_setacl(), but svc_process() skips pc_func when pc_decode returns false, so that cleanup is unreachable on decode failure: svc_process_common() pc_decode() /* decode_setaclargs: false */ /* pc_func skipped */ pc_release() /* fh_put only -- ACLs leaked */ The orphaned posix_acl is leaked for the lifetime of the server. Fix by adding nfsaclsvc_release_setacl() and nfs3svc_release_setacl(), which release both argp->acl_access and argp->acl_default in addition to fh_put(), and wiring them as pc_release for their respective SETACL procedures. pc_release runs on every path svc_process() takes after decode, including decode failure, so the posix_acl_release() pairs are removed from the proc functions' out: labels to keep ownership in one place. This matches the existing release_getacl() pattern used by the sibling GETACL procedures. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53396 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-20 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix posix_acl leak and ignored error in nfsd4_create_file nfsd4_create_file() has two bugs in its ACL handling: The return value of nfsd4_acl_to_attr() is silently discarded. When the NFSv4-to-POSIX ACL conversion fails (e.g., -EINVAL for unsupported ACE types), the file is created without any ACL and the client receives NFS4_OK. This violates RFC 7530/8881 which require the server to reject unsupported attributes on CREATE. When start_creating() fails after ACL attributes have been populated in attrs (either via nfsd4_acl_to_attr or via ownership transfer from open->op_dpacl/op_pacl), the function jumps to out_write which skips nfsd_attrs_free(). The posix_acl allocations are leaked. A client can trigger this repeatedly with OPEN(CREATE), ACL attributes, and an invalid filename (e.g., longer than NAME_MAX). Fix both by capturing the nfsd4_acl_to_attr() return value and by changing the early error paths to jump to out instead of out_write. Initialize child to ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) so that end_creating() is safe to call even if start_creating() was never reached. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53395 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-20 | 7.5 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix dead ACL conflict guard in nfsd4_create nfsd4_create() steals create->cr_dpacl/cr_pacl into the local nfsd_attrs via the designated initializer, then immediately sets the source pointers to NULL. The subsequent conflict guard tests the already-nilled source fields, making it permanently dead code: if (create->cr_acl) { if (create->cr_dpacl || create->cr_pacl) /* always false */ When a client encodes both FATTR4_WORD0_ACL and FATTR4_WORD2_POSIX_{DEFAULT,ACCESS}_ACL in the same CREATE fattr bitmap, nfsd4_acl_to_attr() overwrites attrs.na_pacl/na_dpacl without releasing the originals, leaking two posix_acl slab objects per request. Repeated requests cause unbounded slab exhaustion. Fix by checking attrs.na_dpacl/na_pacl (the stolen values) instead of the nilled create->cr_dpacl/cr_pacl, matching the correct pattern already used in nfsd4_setattr(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-53387 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-20 | 7.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iio: light: veml6075: add bounds check to veml6075_it_ms index veml6075_it_ms has 5 elements but VEML6075_CONF_IT can yield values 0-7. If it returns a value >= 5, this causes an out-of-bounds array access. Add a bounds check and return -EINVAL if the index is out of range. The problem values are reserved so should never be read from the register. Hence this is hardening against fault device, missprogramming or bus corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53386 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-20 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iio: adc: ti-ads1298: add bounds check to pga_settings index ads1298_pga_settings has 7 elements but ADS1298_MASK_CH_PGA can yield values 0-7. If it yields a value >= 7, this causes an out-of-bounds array access. Add a bounds check and return -EINVAL if the index is out of range. Note that the remaining value b111 is reserved so should not be seen in a correctly functioning system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53380 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-20 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: rzv2h-ivc: Fix concurrent buffer list access The list of buffers (`rzv2h_ivc::buffers.queue`) is protected by a spinlock (`rzv2h_ivc::buffers.lock`). However, in `rzv2h_ivc_transfer_buffer()`, which runs in a separate workqueue, the `list_del()` call is executed without holding the spinlock, which makes it possible for the list to be concurrently modified Fix that by removing a buffer from the list in the lock protected section. [assign ivc->buffers.curr in critical section as reported by Barnabas] | ||||
| CVE-2026-14499 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input in the Python Interpreter component. | ||||