Export limit exceeded: 389293 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (389293 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-82006 | 2026-09-08 | 7.8 High | ||
| Photoshop Desktop is affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75863 | 2026-09-08 | 7.8 High | ||
| Photoshop Desktop is affected by an Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86808 | 1 Moltis-org | 1 Moltis | 2026-09-08 | 7.3 High |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in moltis-org moltis up to 20260818.10. The affected element is the function vault_unlock_handler/vault_recovery_handler of the file vault.rs. Such manipulation leads to missing authentication. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 20260819.01 is sufficient to fix this issue. The name of the patch is 3b92dd64d5648f829968cf48bf67dc3113852fef. Upgrading the affected component is advised. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75991 | 2026-09-08 | 8.6 High | ||
| Illustrator is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75992 | 2026-09-08 | 7.8 High | ||
| Illustrator is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24291 | 2 Versa, Versa-networks | 2 Director, Versa Director | 2026-09-08 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Versa Director SD-WAN orchestration platform provides functionality to upload various types of files. However, the Java code handling file uploads contains an argument injection vulnerability. By appending additional arguments to the file name, an attacker can bypass MIME type validation, allowing the upload of arbitrary file types. This flaw can be exploited to place a malicious file on disk. Versa Networks is not aware of any reported instance where this vulnerability was exploited. Proof of concept for this vulnerability has been disclosed by third party security researchers. There are no workarounds to disable the GUI option. Versa recommends that Director be upgraded to one of the remediated software versions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23173 | 2 Versa, Versa-networks | 2 Director, Versa Director | 2026-09-08 | 7.5 High |
| The Versa Director SD-WAN orchestration platform provides direct web-based access to uCPE virtual machines through the Director GUI. By default, the websockify service is exposed on port 6080 and accessible from the internet. This exposure introduces significant risk, as websockify has known weaknesses that can be exploited, potentially leading to remote code execution. Versa Networks is not aware of any reported instance where this vulnerability was exploited. Proof of concept for this vulnerability has been disclosed by third party security researchers. Workarounds or Mitigation: Restrict access to TCP port 6080 if uCPE console access is not necessary. Versa recommends that Director be upgraded to one of the remediated software versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84869 | 2026-09-08 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| A condition in the ScreenConnect client may allow files to be transferred and executed through an active remote session without authorization or Host confirmation in certain circumstances. ScreenConnect servers are not impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78230 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Ai | 2026-09-08 | N/A |
| AshAi exposes Ash read actions to language-model tool calls. The read tool accepts an aggregate result type (min, max, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value. Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A tool caller could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate; min/max in particular return an actual field value. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The tool's existing check only required the field to be public, which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization. The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible. This issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78216 | 1 Ash-project | 1 Ash Lua | 2026-09-08 | N/A |
| AshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an eval action. A read call accepts an operation (list, min, max, first, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value. Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization. The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible. This issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86218 | 1 N-able | 1 N-central | 2026-09-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| N-central is vulnerable to a pre-auth remote code execution This issue affects N-central: before 2026.3.1.14. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49883 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| In checkReadPermission of PermissionsManager.java, there is a possible way to monitor sensitive device state data due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28659 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| In MicroXR Blobstore, there is a possible way to access other app's files due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69343 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more | 2026-09-08 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Overlay Filter allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69303 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 9 more | 2026-09-08 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Push Message Routing Service allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69297 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows Server 2012 and 5 more | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Storing passwords in a recoverable format in Windows DHCP Server allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66306 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Skype For Business Server 2015, Skype For Business Server 2019, Skype For Business Server Subscription Edition | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Generation of error message containing sensitive information in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76202 | 2026-09-08 | 8.2 High | ||
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain elevated access to sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77774 | 2026-09-08 | 8.6 High | ||
| Adobe Commerce is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0799 | 1 Tcpdump | 1 Libpcap | 2026-09-08 | 8.7 High |
| In BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a scratch memory register the register index is an unsigned 32-bit integer and must not exceed 15, but libpcap BPF interpreter does not validate the value. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading and writing the OS process memory in the 16GiB starting at the current stack frame on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures. | ||||